does anybody know how
much his transfer fee would cost us.
Not exact matches
I would have to queue another transaction with a
much higher
fee, enough to entice a miner to process my first, low -
fee transfer so they could then also process the second one.
Malcolm Hamilton, a partner at consulting firm Mercer, thinks there is room for the PRPP as long as the
fees are low and the plans offer enough advantages over group RRSPs for employers to adopt them (e.g.
much of the administrative burden
transferred to the government).
3 — While Bitcoin
transfer fees are getting higher, through the Steem ecosystem you can make
transfers at
much cheaper
fees.
This consequently raised the Trezor
fee, costing some users as
much as $ 200 to
transfer a single bitcoin.
If you owe around $ 15,000 — the average household credit card debt — then the Chase Slate ® could save such you as
much as $ 750 by skipping the
transfer fee.
It appears that Arsenal have had scouts monitoring his progress all year and have decided to make an official bid of # 1.2 m plus the usual performance - related add - ons which could add up to
much more than the
transfer fee if he is a success at the Emirates.
But... As Highlighted, Chelsea made three million in
transfer fees, but I'd like to see how
much money they put Begovic on as opposed to Cech's wage with us.
Arsene playin every game he can through the media to drive up the
transfer fee as
much as he can (cause of course Kroenke and the board want that $ $ $ $), while Mesut is auditioning for Messi and Barca with every match.
It was only the summer after Gazidis arrived that we became tight fisted up till Ozil
transfer, not going over # 10 million by
much... didn't compete with Arshavin
transfer fee for years.
Here we go again.Let us be positive going into our first match.So we were very wary of the team selection against chelsea but we came out strong.All this team need is total support from fans.I watched the Manu match yesterday we all saw some of their weaknesses considering how
much they've invested the last 4 yrs.Players should judged based on their performances not on
transfer fees.
«Real Madrid are a club so worried about image that when I interviewed Bale it was requested to me, «don't put in the
transfer fee, don't put in the article how
much Gareth Bale cost»,» Northcroft began, as relayed by Goal.
DENIAL that the squad remains weighed down by players who are not the right standard and are paid too
much meaning that other more suitable Clubs don't want them DENIAL that the only reason Ozil is likely to sign a new contract is down to the fact that no other Club would pay him the same salary on top of any form of
transfer fee (same as the «deadwood really»..
I really do not see why Arsene Wenger would bother about the
transfer fee if he was really keen on signing this top class centre forward, especially if the comments of Lord Harris recently suggesting that the Frenchman could spend pretty
much whatever he wanted to are correct or even close to the truth.
We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so
much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package»,
transfer fees and wages that spiral up.
So we're
much stronger at CB with the potential
transfer fees a 20mil upgrade.
With the 25 year old in his final year at Toulouse, the ball is very
much in his court and realistically you'd expect Toulouse would want to get some sort of
fee for their player, rather than lose him on a free
transfer next year.
The report claims that they are holding out for a
transfer fee of around # 8 million, which is too
much for a defender with just six months left on his contract.
It remains to be seen whether or not Chelsea will bid as
much as # 30million for Stones but that type offer would surely prove too difficult for Everton to resist as they would be recouping 10 times the
transfer fee they paid Barnsley in 2013.
Despite the crazy money that's been thrown around in the
transfer window nowadays, I don't think West Ham could demand too
much of a
fee considering his age and that he wants out.
I agree with Wenger's point that «Big» players can be bought for
transfer fees that are not big, and a few hidden gems turn out to be big players despite not costing
much, but it's only a few.
if you look at the last article, I said those
transfer fees concerning Ronaldo, Mata, Hazard and Suarez were deemed too
much by Wenger.
The Daily Star claim that the Turkish club Galatasaray have agreed to sign the German in a deal that would not get us
much of a
transfer fee but would free up a lot of wages.
He will become like a new signing without the
transfer fee, and so can demand
much higher wages if he has a good season at B'Mouth
I don't think any of the players mentioned above would ever earn as
much as Arsenal pay them, which is probably just as big a stumbling block for sales as well as the inflated
transfer fees.
Le Prof would NEVER spend that type of
transfer fee on the lad but
much like you've said Mick the big Belgian, if healthy would consisently be a 20 - 30 goal scorer with Ozil / Santi / Rambo / Sanchez and the likes feeding him on a weekly basis.
The
much talked about
transfer of the Arsenal and England international midfielder looks like it is going ahead this summer after all, with Sky Sports now reporting that the Gunners have agreed a
transfer fee with the reigning Premier League champions.
According to the Sun, the Blues are ready to pay as
much as # 100million for the prolific Argentine forward, who would break the Premier League
transfer record if he moved for that
fee.
Until this tiny petty manager and owner leave football to the real passionate experts out there we won't even exsist as a top club so we're better off waiting for that day to come in 2/3 years and hope usamanov is the man to take over and cleanse the whole club from top to bottom and rid of Wengers cancer and loosers who get paid way to
much just to install a tiny weak loser mentality and petty training and
transfers Tactics with teeny weeny
transfer fees and huge wages for mediocre staff n players Bring on 2020
Arsenal may well not get as
much back in terms of a
transfer fee from this deal if it went ahead, but with the German champions Bayern Munich showing real reluctance to pay Alexis Sanchez the sort of wages he is said to be after, the only other options open to Arsene Wenger are selling to a Premier League rival or keeping him with the risk of having an unhappy and disruptive player in the dressing room for a year before he swans off for nothing anyway.
According to Don Balon, Chelsea are ready to fork out as
much as # 130m for the Spain international in what would more than double their previous
transfer record
fee, paid last summer for Alvaro Morata, also to Real Madrid.
The 29 - year - old has scored just four times since his
much hyped summer loan move and it looks ever more unlikely that United will take up their option to make the switch a permanent one and will refuse to put forward the eye - watering # 46 million
transfer fee, according to The Sun.
Maybe, as the Evening Standard says that Arsenal value Gibbs at # 15 million and that does not sound too
much compared to the majority of
transfer fees we have seen recently.
To be fair to Arsene Wenger and the Arsenal board, a
transfer fee of # 10 million does not sound like too
much to ask for a player with the pace and technical ability that Kieran Gibbs has and the experience that being an England international with nearly 150 Premier League games and close to 50 in the Champions League brings with it.
The issue for Arsenal now seems to be whether we view Sterling as damaged goods, too
much of a risk or simply not good enough to spend a big
transfer fee on, because the Daily Star has reported that the Gunners are the club he wants to play for.
As a free
transfer, you can not get
much more of a better deal financially, however whilst the report remains unconfirmed by Arsenal.com, it's unlikely we'll find
much financial information surrounding a weekly wage, length of contract or signing on
fee.
This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so
much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and
transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?
Should Spurs end up going after Gomes, it'll be interesting to see how
much of a
transfer fee the 24 - year - old ends up costing the north London side should they sign him.
It is also questionable whether Alexis would fit into the youth policy currently in place at Spurs and his
transfer fee and wages may be too
much for a club building a new stadium.
They have so
much money to spend that it doesn't matter if a
transfer fee for a certain player seems like a massive overpay.
Somebody like Milinkovic - Savic is going to likely cost a
transfer fee that is closer to $ 100 million than it is to $ 50 million because Lazio have every right to hold out for as
much money as humanly possible.
There will be the guy that hates the board and will repeatedly accuses them of penny - pinching / misleading / talking to media too
much / not giving supporters enough information; another who is adamant that we are paying well over the odds for every player linked (as if the
transfer fee was coming out of his own pocket); and the bloke that doesn't like or want us to do business with certain other clubs.
Furthermore, Sanchez has pretty
much paid back his
transfer fee with his winning goal.
For a
transfer fee of # 16million, the Mexican hitman will add
much - needed quality and quantity up front.
Xhaka is thought to be Wenger's top target to strengthen his midfield and the French man is prepared to commit as
much as # 65m in both
transfer fee and wages to sign the midfielder.
Simply put,
transfer fees really don't mean
much at all to clubs in the English top flight any more.
While that's all true, the deal is for so
much money: The
transfer fee more than doubles the previous world record; Neymar's dad, who's also his acting agent, could get as
much as $ 40 million in
fees; and the total cost of the deal could be closer to $ 450 million.
Nevertheless, Mestre insists the Coutinho
fee is
much less than they could have paid, although Liverpool always denied claims in the Spanish press they had quoted 200m euros (# 176m) to Barca for a summer
transfer.
Most of his wages are covered by Arsenal and they do not expect to see
much of the original # 3m
transfer fee when his contract ends.
Never mind his
transfer fee — at # 29million (
fee via BBC Sport), he was the most expensive Bundesliga export of all - time prior to Kevin De Bruyne's move to Manchester City — he was a signing who created excitement among fans as
much through bragging rights, if not more so, than the logic of his move in purely football terms.