Sentences with phrase «much ice exactly»

The question is, how much ice exactly will still remain in both houses after six weeks.

Not exact matches

Howat and his team were able to figure this out by creating high - resolution topographic models of the glaciers and their boundaries, as well as a numerical model of exactly how much water was flowing off these coastal glaciers and ice caps — technology that wasn't available back in 1996.
There's over 80 amazingly brilliant vegan ice cream recipes for ice cream, pops, ice cream sandwiches, ice cream cake, smoothies etc. ~ creamy, rich, decadent with so many flavours and interesting combinations of ingredients... YET we settled for a simple Coconut Water Cooler recipe... but that's exactly why I loved this book so much — it has a pure, natural and even simple way to eat healthier ice cream treats.
Thanks so much Ksenia, that is exactly how I think of this ice cream.
I did not know exactly what to do with it though so I made a vanilla cake and put it between the layers and topped it with vanilla icing and lemon rind much like you were going to do.
You can definitely use a pre-blended curry mix here, but since different curries vary in their degree of spice, I can not tell you exactly how much curry to put in your ice cream.
Well said, did you see the ice time for Hedman....27 + minutes?!?! As much as I despise him for the spearing incident, he is exactly what the Devils do not have, a shut down defenseman who can log big minutes and has the physicality and hockey IQ to run the show blue line back.
«The anomaly was detected in much more limited measurements of the Byrd ice core in the 1990s,» notes McConnell, «but exactly what it was or what created it wasn't clear.
Originally, I didn't bring my food processor to the island because it's not exactly little or light, but after talking with my co-workers about how much I love making - and eating - banana ice cream, I decided I should probably bring it up.
To find out exactly how much of a difference it makes, we're driving a handful of new FCA vehicles around a snow - and ice - covered racetrack that, in summer, is used for track days and driver training.
The key thing that matters to the ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula is how much melting occurs in summer, and this is almost exactly what Abram et al. are looking at.
There is no reason whatsoever to expect that similar behavior will be seen at the different poles; a few feet of ice floating on water is not exactly the same as two kilometers of ice piled up on a continent (East Antarctica) nor is either of those much like a kilometer of ice sitting on the sea floor (West Antarctica).
It has more spatial variability than Lewis's model which has exactly zero, not even land - water - ice, so it is much better than what they are comparing it with.
I would be happy for any real mathematician to solve this complex problem and say exactly, «How much water is needed for a rise of 1 meter and up to the limit of the BS that gets said, and «where all the water is going to come from» all I wanted to do was to point out that all the talk about rises of 20 meters is such BS, as the water does not exist to do that, me I think that if all the ice did melt then you would be lucky to get a 1 meter rise, no one would be more thrilled than me if this math was worked out better than I can do it.
The problem is that there is so much politically motivated scaremongering going on that most non scientific people I meet are unaware that warming has not continued to go trough the root and do not know that Arctic sea ice is at exactly the same extent as it was in 2007.
How much doubt exactly, in what terms and in what ways, applied to what scales and for what spans, do you percolate out of all Kernodle's disparate disparagements of the ice core record?
But there is so much we can't yet know — including exactly how strong each of these trends will become as ice loss continues, and how these and other developments will interact.
Although there are large uncertainties as to exactly how much ice is being lost from Greenland and Antarctica, there are two things that should become abundantly clear to anyone who reads the literature, they're both losing ice, and these losses are accelerating (Rignot et al, 2011).
RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?
I must have missed the part about ONE scoop after supper, because long story short, I filled Ethan's cereal bowl with THREE scoops of ice cream an HOUR before supper because he assured me that was exactly how much his dad usually gave him.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z