Sentences with phrase «much investment value»

Not exact matches

It's an unusual investment strategy, to be sure, but like other kinds of U.S. real estate, recreational ranch land values nosedived in the downturn, shedding as much 50 percent from the peak in certain markets.

It's also possible that the new coin may climb to a much higher value than the initial investment.

For instance, sending key personnel to trade conferences and seminars is not only a great investment in training your people, but it also shows how much you value continual learning.

«The more you put in today, the much more you'll have later down the road because of the time value of money and the growth on investment returns,» Michael Solari, a certified financial planner with Solari Financial Management, told Business Insider.

If this seems like a large investment to you, remember that you're not just dealing with single customers; you're also showing other current (and potential) customers how much you value the individual.

This tool uses the present value of bond portfolios, adjusted for interest rate and inflation expectations, to show current retirees how much in retirement savings they need today to account for every $ 1 they need in the future, assuming they hold a portfolio made up entirely of investment - grade bonds and longer - term Treasurys.

They do not have to count the rental value of their homes as taxable income, even though that value is just as much a return on investment as are stock dividends or interest on a savings account.

«I'm not sure I can add very much value to what the other speakers have already said,» Mohamed El - Erian humbly began in a speech at the 2012 Strategic Investment Conference Thursday afternoon, jointly hosted by the alternative investment firm Altegris and Millennium Wave Investments in CarlsbaInvestment Conference Thursday afternoon, jointly hosted by the alternative investment firm Altegris and Millennium Wave Investments in Carlsbainvestment firm Altegris and Millennium Wave Investments in Carlsbad, Calif..

It is not clear how much ADT Caps is valued at now, but industry sources say a private equity firm typically looks for a return of at least twice its initial investment, which means a sale of the business could potentially fetch around $ 4 billion.

When the Company seeks cash investments from outside investors, like you, the new investors typically pay a much larger sum for their shares than the founders or earlier investors, which means that the cash value of your stake is immediately diluted because each share of the same type is worth the same amount, and you paid more for your shares (or the notes convertible into shares) than earlier investors did for theirs.

On the other hand, real estate can be controlled much easier by investing correctly in assets that are under market value with multiple exit strategies that help increase the return on the investment while decreasing the risk.

Because if they try to take 50 % of your company for $ 500,000 then they know it will be very hard to raise VC because we'll know that too much of the value has been taken away from the founders before our investment.

There's no arguing that the Starwood Preferred Guest ® Business Credit Card from American Express holds a lot of potential value; whether it's a good investment comes down to how much of that value your business can access.

Unlike the case of initial public offerings, where much of the value is already priced in at the IPO launch, or even the traditional venture capital system, an ICO allows investors to not only become financial backers but also early adopters, since the investment coin's long term value is in future products or services.

I'm much more concerned with the income generated from my investments rather than the value of those investments.

The best investment strategy for you will depend on the value of your assets, how much income you have from other sources, your monthly expenses, your goals for retirement, your desire for leaving an estate, and more.

For tax purposes, you may need to know how much the investments were worth on the day your loved one died — the date - of - death value.

Throwback Thursday — Dole Investment Analysis Case Study Part 3 *** This is the eighth post in our new Throwback Thursday's Series, where we share with you posts from the past blogs to bring you as much value as possible.

Throwback Thursday — Dole Investment Analysis Case Study Part 2 *** This is the seventh post in our new Throwback Thursday's Series, where we share with you posts from the past blogs to bring you as much value as possible.

Instead, they often spread their wealth out over a variety of different investments so they don't take as much of a hit if one asset loses value.

It is our goal to find companies whose future growth and value are relatively predicable, therefore making it that much more probable that the investment will generate solid returns.

Nor do I really care much, as long as I'm able to find a few investment ideas that offer compelling value.

In terms of growth, stable value funds have clearly outperformed money market funds, so much so that we believe they are the more attractive low - risk investment option when viewed holistically.

The value of your investment doesn't move around as much, which gives you a better idea of how much it'd be worth in the future.

If Cech happens then # 10M to perhaps concede 2 - 4 less goals (not forgetting less conceded goals carries as much weight as additional goals scored) appears top value and a no - brainer compared to these # 30 - 50M centre forward investments.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

# 1.0 is already a fair offer and # 1.2 would be a premium to the current value and only worth it to Usmanov if he has another # 300 million laying around to invest in the club that has been ruined in the last few years with poor investments in the squad and having allowed the squad to age too much.

Nestlé makes much in its Creating Shared Value report about it being included in the FTSE4Good ethical investment index.

The State Senate has turned its back on middle class values and the issues that matter most to our communities, and I look forward to advocating for investments in infrastructure, an increase in the minimum wage and much needed government reforms to clean up Albany.

If New York State could find a new tenant or even sell the factory and equipment, the state's investment per job is much lower than if the factory and equipment has no value if SolarCity leaves.

As a result of this project, I feel much better equipped to assess the political implications of certain types of investments and to convey the value of scientific investments to targeted audiences.»

Definitely worth the investment, because you get so much value out of versatility.

However, it was the first time I had partnered with other people in a venture and I have since learned a lot about understanding your value, your idea's value, and how much to give up in relation to the investment.

A Welsh Local Government Association spokesman responded: «During a period of austerity it is prudent to maintain an appropriate level of reserves, however this needs to be balanced with securing as much value as possible through investment in schools and delivering outcomes for pupils.

That will add continuing value to the dealership and the brand, which can make the return on the EBE investment that much greater.

Then, it's not about cost, it's about how much value that investment is going to bring.

The value of your investment doesn't move around as much, which gives you a better idea of how much it'd be worth in the future.

Because bonds are a safer investment, you shouldn't see too much volatility in terms of the value of your account; it'll be relatively stable.

There's no arguing that the Starwood Preferred Guest ® Business Credit Card from American Express holds a lot of potential value; whether it's a good investment comes down to how much of that value your business can access.

Thus, the mindset of a person buying alternative investments is typically this: If my stock portfolio takes a hit, at least I have these other investments — which hopefully will hold their value or not fall as much — to hold me over.

The first thing you have to examine when deciding how much you can spend on your new home is how much you are worth, taking into account your income, savings, investments and other holdings such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) or Keogh plans, the cash value of your life insurance, pensions or corporate savings plans, and equity in real estate.

If you just want to see how much your investments are worth today (current snapshot), but do not care about their value over time.

With VUL policies, the cash value is also applied to the policy's fixed account, but you can also choose from many variable investment options, much like mutual funds.

At that time money managers came to be seen as superstars and they were very well - respected — John Templeton, Bob Krembil (head of Chiefswood Holdings Ltd., Peter Cundill (who founded the much - respected Cundill Value Fund in 1974) and Peter Lynch (manager of the Magellan Fund at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990 where he averaged a 29.2 % annual return), to name a few.

A large portion of your premiums payments will be invested in the insurance company's investment fund in whatever asset class you prefer (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, money market funds, etc.) Over time, this has the chance to generate a much larger cash value in your insurance account than a traditional whole life policy does.

As we mentioned in a previous shareholder letter, Jason Zweig, the noted Wall Street Journal columnist and author of Your Money and Your Brain (2007), credited much of the investment success of value investors such as Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) and Benjamin Graham to being «inversely emotional,» i.e., sharing a quality that goes beyond calm, «a certain imperturbability or implacability.»

How much does a simple change to optimize bond and stock allocation like this affect the value of your investment portfolio?

While there is much that remains unknowable in financial markets, what we do know is that Graham's «big idea» — that a common stock represents a fractional ownership interest in a business and that the essence of investment is to attempt to exploit discrepancies between the intrinsic value of a business and its price in publicly traded markets — has empirically and practically worked over the long term.

Currently I wouldn't estimate the value to have changed much since the initial investment and therefore not subject to capital gains tax.

Because you're recalculating how much you should withdraw each year based not only on your assumed life expectancy, but also on your portfolio's year - end value, you're forced to raise or lower your withdrawals depending on how your investments performed over the prior year.