Sentences with phrase «much justification in»

Not exact matches

And in that, they share much in common with Japanese culture: «To condemn someone... prematurely without sufficient justification is inappropriate everywhere but especially so in a relationship - oriented culture where interpersonal ties assume priority and being sympathetic to others is a moral imperative.

Indeed, much of your argument was the justification of the religious street wars in the 1800's in the US.

Seeking a philosophical justification of holism seems to be a much more fruitful strategy than finding incoherences in various philosophies.

True, the sanctification process of Christianity is much more difficult than living for yourself; however, resting in the salvation / justification / presence of God benefits of Christianity brings joy.

I have seen the good and bad of christianity and in viewpoint after much questioning, I see no justification for it - simply no need.

We live in the USA where we are oppressed by much of the populous using the Bible and Christianity as justification for the oppression.

In this country we are oppressed by much of the populous using the Bible and Christianity as justification for the oppression.

But it does follow that the development of a civilization which decimates other species casually and threatens to deforest much of the rest of the planet in the next two decades is beyond justification.

The secular community with some justification has resisted insights which appear to come from religion and theology, since so much of this has been clearly antithetical to the facts of human beings and their development and to mental and social health in general.

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

It is in this context that Paul says much about the natural man being «in sin,» until its burden is lifted and victory is won through justification by faith in Jesus Christ.

This philosophy of the will which traverses all the levels of objectification, universalization, and realization is to my eyes the philosophy of the will, with much more justification than the meager determination of the Wille by the form of the imperative in the Kantian philosophy.

Yet there is good biblical justification for such a present reference, and much meaning in it.

Evangelicals in the various Holiness, Wesleyan, and Arminian traditions are, one may suggest, much closer to the Catholic understanding of the relationship between justification and sanctification than they are to the more rigorous Lutheran and Calvinist champions of «justification by faith alone.»

The concepts «morality» and «moral development,» however much meaning and justification they may have in other connections, are excluded for Jesus, because he sees man in the crisis of decision, and because for him the concepts «good» and «bad» depend upon the will of God.

But at that time, the controversy which I did manage to get hold of, which is in Whitehead, is that between Whitehead's vision of the passage of nature and what he calls, and with much justification (writing, of course, in 1920), «materialism»:

Duméry makes much of this, whether it be a question of descriptive analogies like those of Otto in The Idea of the Holy or of a justification of these analyses by a critique of knowledge such as is suggested by the works of Husserl, Scheler, or Gabriel Marcel.

In these respects, the adherents of the social gospel could claim with full justification to be faithful to Wesley in a way that much of the Wesleyan movement in the nineteenth century was noIn these respects, the adherents of the social gospel could claim with full justification to be faithful to Wesley in a way that much of the Wesleyan movement in the nineteenth century was noin a way that much of the Wesleyan movement in the nineteenth century was noin the nineteenth century was not.

That so much of what is in the Bible has, in the long experience of men and women, validated itself over and over again as true, constitutes the justification for speaking of it as the Word of God.

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

Season tickets are already the highest in the league, so there ain't much justification for making them higher.

Aleksandr Lavrinovich, a former minister of justice and the current chair of the high council of justice in Ukraine, reportedly said in justification: «Great Britain would very much like to leave the European convention on human rights.»

Although a new presidency always revisits its predecessor's regulations, «what's unique about the Trump administration is that we're seeing so much sloppy work, in the sense of these stays that have absolutely no justification,» says Emily Hammond, a professor at The George Washington University Law School who is tracking the issue.

Splashed in jukebox colours, filmed with flash but wisdom that allows for the action to be comprehensible at all times (even if the ethos isn't), Atomic Blonde suffers because it doesn't have a strong narrative justification for what it does and spends way too much time looking at female bodies in various states of undress, arousal, and injury.

But Chad Alderman, a policy analyst at the consulting firm Bellwether Education Partners, argued the federal government was always clear about the possibility of getting a higher education board to sign off on alternative standards — even if that took no more than a letter of support without much in the way of policy justification.

I realize that much has changed in the last few years — widespread economic hardship, cuts in state aid by both Democratic and Republican state governments, much slower than anticipated growth in property values,, the opportunity to cut staff compensation under the threat of union busting, dramatic cuts to the revenue limit base — but despite all of these changes, if you go back to the principles and the details of Partnership Plan used to sell the 2008 Operating Referendum (which passed overwhelmingly) I think you can find plenty of justification for increasing property taxes in order to achieve the mission of the district.

The new fixed layout ePUBs will show gradient paragraph rules, gradient strokes and fills in tables, and much more — but justification does not work in FXL.

In 1919, at the Paris Peace Conference, which marked the end of World War I, justification for claims to territory assumed huge importance because there was so much to be divided up and so many competing claims... the arguments fell into three main categories: strategic, ethnographic, and historical right.

In fact, e-readers too are being increasingly seen adopting a touchscreen approach with the most notable exception to this design trend is the Kindle which still sees the justification of having a full fledged keyboard below the main reading area even in the new and much improved Kindle In fact, e-readers too are being increasingly seen adopting a touchscreen approach with the most notable exception to this design trend is the Kindle which still sees the justification of having a full fledged keyboard below the main reading area even in the new and much improved Kindle in the new and much improved Kindle 3.

We've reached this magical point where people either claim LCD is just as good for reading as eInk (the common justification being you can't read eInk in the dark — guess it's too much like a book) or they just don't mention the readability of the screen.

In pursuit of justification to charge a higher price for e-books than, say, $ 9.99 — perhaps even as much for an e-book as a hardcover — there has been much discussion of possibility of producing «enhanced» e-books.

Pressing on the middle of the screen brings up both the top bar and the bottom bar which shows how much percentage was read, quick navigation from left to right in terms of pages, table of contents, annotation, search both dictionaries all under this book icon and the most important setting would be the font size and the font augmentation because you can choose the font faces, font - size, line spaces, margins and justification.

You see, once a law like this goes on the books at the state or local level, it becomes much easier for lawmakers — and the activists who have their ears — to promote similar legislation in other places by using precedent as justification.

There doesn't appear to be any justification for these removals, as it seems not much was added in its place.

The more they accumulate, the stronger the justification for those conclusions become, such that even when some of the stronger conclusions are eventually replaced, we may know with some confidence that much of their content will be preserved, and that the difference will largely consist of the form (language) in which that content is expressed.

If you use the Kelvin scale, there will not be much difference in the result averaged any which way and b. an arithmetic average has a simple justification based on thermodynamics.

If they do not know what is going on, then there is no way to know what to do in the first place, much less any justification to visit quantifiably significant pain and suffering on vulnerable populations in order to do it.

«Uncertainty» about whether or not something (very costly), which we do (in the «uncertain» attempt to change our climate from an «uncertain» model - generated threat) will have «uncertain» unintended negative consequences, which could be much more severe than the «uncertain» threat we are attempting to mitigate against in the first place, seems to ba a reasonable justification for NOT doing this mitigating action.

In fact, depending on their mechanism of affecting climate, they could well reinforce one another, Given that any such mechanism remains speculative, and that there isn't much correlation between the cycle involved and actual glacial «cycles», there's no real justification for any assumption (s) regarding how important such «forcing» is.

Diverting attention from the elephant in the room, that AGW is hugely exagerated, probably insignificant, and can not change much in several lifetimes, and does not justify any of the very profitable and expensive measures enacted in its name, which make its single and deadly natural supposed cause worse by laws that are regressive inscience fact on each of their own justifications.

Well, that strategy didn't work in terms of a justification and even prescription for policy, and it shouldn't have worked; energy and climate policy has much more complex issues to deal with than consensus science (issues of politics and values).

Indeed, in the work of those like Shue who embrace a «the rich must go first» approach (as opposed to an equal per capita allocations approach), the absence of any justification for an answer to «first, but by how much and for how long?»

If you are in too much of a hurry to troll away that you fail to read the article, which contains more than adequate justification for Judiths claims (which are not ad hom in any way — dishonesty is dishonesty, ad hominum doesn't come into it), how about leave the discussion to us grownups

However Hypothetical mechanisms with no justification in real world data are just so much arm waving.

The «about to commit a crime» justification for a Terry stop makes it, in practice, much broader than probable cause for an arrest, which requires that the police believe that a crime has actually already been committed or is in progress, not just that someone is about to commit a crime (a person may be subjected to a Terry stop even if his actions which tend to show he is about to commit a crime have not yet progressed to the level of an attempted offense for which someone may be convicted and are not truly imminent).

The same view underpinned much of the Benchers» reluctant justification for granting TWU's accreditation in April.

In situations where an enforced prenuptial agreement results in one spouse being in a much better financial situation will generally not be justification to invalidate the prenuptial agreemenIn situations where an enforced prenuptial agreement results in one spouse being in a much better financial situation will generally not be justification to invalidate the prenuptial agreemenin one spouse being in a much better financial situation will generally not be justification to invalidate the prenuptial agreemenin a much better financial situation will generally not be justification to invalidate the prenuptial agreement.

Any act of terrorism is a painful hit to any society and its innocent members — it should always be strongly underlined that there is no justification for targeting any human's life due to any form of extremism, and one must bear in mind that often it is not about the death itself, but to intimidate the nations in order for them to become more vulnerable, and to limit widely understood human rights as this kind of society, namely the threatened society, is much is easier to be governed.

[However, the footnote to this passage states: «The origins and justification of this image are very much tied in with the operation of the criminal trial process.

Lord Millett referred back to Lord Denning's justification of the derivative action in Wallersteiner, which applies as much to a multiple derivative action as it does to a standard derivative action.