Sentences with phrase «much less chicken»

Chicken Meal — The saving grace of this formula (since there is much less chicken protein after cooking than the ingredients list would lead you to believe) is that chicken meal is listed second.

I used much less chicken that it called for.

Not exact matches

Chicken jerky is less popular than beef jerky for the same reason most people will choose a rib - eye over chicken breast — on its own, chicken doesn't have that much Chicken jerky is less popular than beef jerky for the same reason most people will choose a rib - eye over chicken breast — on its own, chicken doesn't have that much chicken breast — on its own, chicken doesn't have that much chicken doesn't have that much flavor.

Growing mealworms, earthworms, and others takes much less space and work than even chickens do - much less beef.

This chicken pho recipe just as good as take - out and costs so much less to make!

Depending on how much chicken you have you might need more or less of this.

Add some steamed rice and this Kung Pao Chicken from Heather Christo Cooks makes take - out look much less appealing.

Homemade pâté is a great way to use chicken livers, and in my opinion, a much less confronting way to eat them — if you're new to this type of ingredient.

yes, tempeh is the less processed choice when it comes to soyfoods — much better for you than fake chicken and sausage made from soy, and many people say healthier than tofu as well.

Chicken parmesan can sometimes be a complicated dish, but these bites have the same delicious flavor and require much less preparation.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Keeping Giroud on this squad with the promise of substantial playing time... the offensive tactics of this squad is way too indirect and is much more reflective of a hold up play / cross in the box scheme that suits Giroud's skill - sets but can't continue if Wenger really wants Lacazette to be successful... without Sanchez on the pitch this offence is a little bit like a headless chicken, passing sideways, providing relatively poor service to undersized players and sub-par finishing... this isn't to suggest that Arsenal can't perform without Alexis but this offensive scheme is antiquated and ill - advised, especially considering our personnel (poor man's Barca)... if Arsenal doesn't want to pay the price to get topnotch players so we can press high and play all out attack, we would be better served by adopting a counterattack approach... unfortunately that would mean developing a far less skittish defensive group that could withstand the pressure and we all know that Wenger hasn't opted for that approach considering our defensive pickups in recent years and the lack of a «boss» in the midfield

Why on God's green Earth should sandwich meat (chicken, for example), cheese, bread, canned tomatoes, or any of hundreds of other foods have - ANY - sweetener in them, much less a corn - based one?

Breast milk (but the levels can vary based on the mother's diet), formula, supplements, eggs from DHA - fed chickens, wild salmon, and tuna (canned chunk light tuna has as much as three times less mercury than albacore tuna).

The govt has to spend money on either subsidies (rationing) or to improve standard of living.Subsidies take much less time to implement than improving standard of living.Once a country chooses subsidies, it gets stuck into the chicken - egg problem.This is how it happens,

The state of broiler chickens has been much less publicised, with the majority of the public under the impression that the chickens they eat are «spent» laying hens.

The method is much less cumbersome than dealing with chicken eggs, and because the vaccine is so easy to produce, the company intends to use 135 micrograms of hemagglutinin in each dose of vaccine — 3 times higher than current flu vaccines — in hopes of getting better protection.

«We'll develop the science on the much less expensive chicken egg tissues and then we'll start our own stem cell bank here and begin making these mouse - derived tissue constructs,» Elson says.

Although lentils, for example, are much less calorically dense than fried chicken, eating them and other plant foods to excess may lead to weight gain.

Within one week of adding free range, organic, grass fed chicken back into my diet, I lost four pounds and felt much less bloated.

«Fried» chicken As a special treat, try re-creating this fast - food favorite with fewer calories and much less saturated fat: Dip chicken cutlets in egg whites, and coat them in whole - grain bread crumbs seasoned with salt, pepper, dried parsley, paprika, garlic, or Parmesan cheese.

This chicken pho recipe just as good as take - out and costs so much less to make!

There's also much less variety; in today's supermarket, it's generally possible to purchase flesh from just three kinds of large animals (cattle, pigs, and young sheep) and two kinds of small animals (chicken and turkey).

Chicken has about the same or maybe a little more cholesterol than red meat, but much less saturated fat.

Predominantly animal foods: eggs, dairy, and meat, including chicken and fish, whereas plant foods have much less: fruits, vegetables, grains, and beans.

It's much less expensive to buy a whole chicken than boneless skinless chicken breasts or any one part of the chicken.

Mostly I use them for cooking bacon in the oven (so much less messy than pan-frying), but I add the rack when I make meatballs, bacon - wrapped chicken, or jalapeño poppers.

I haven't really used chicken liver much — although I hear it's more mild + less gamey than liver from a larger animal.

Thanks so much for the party, Carrie1 I saw your amazing bacon cheddar chicken recipe featured on Living Well Spending Less — congrats!

This weekend might be all about Black Panther, Marvel's much - anticipated, 18th entry in its ten - years - and - counting cinematic universe, but that's no reason to ignore the other visually expansive, comedic delight arriving in in multiplexes: Oscar - winner Nick Park's (Chicken Run, Wallace & Gromit) latest foray into stop - motion wizardry (his first as sole director), Early Man, an unexpected, if no less welcome, ode to the joys, excitement, and wonders of the «beautiful game» («soccer» to less enlightened Americans, European football everywhere else) set against the backdrop of a future - hanging - in - the - balance, winner - take - all Stone Age vs. Bronze Age football match that's almost as thrilling and exhilarating as watching Real Madrid vs. FC Barcelona or Manchester United vs. Manchester City play in front of paying fans (i.e., in the real world with real - world stakes).

For me it works poorly, but then, my chicken scratch is barely recognizable to me, much less a computer.

This just means that once the food is cooked, the actual volume of protein contributed by the fresh chicken is much less.

The fact that this ingredient contains so much protein may seem like a good thing, but it is less biologically valuable for your dog than something like chicken because it is plant - based, not animal - based.

These tend to be less nutritious but are often used in economy dog foods because them are much less expensive than whole turkey, chicken or meat.

Since ingredients are listed by weight and raw chicken contains up to 80 % water, this ingredient contributes much less to overall nutrition when cooked.

Fresh chicken (and other meats) contain up to 80 % water which means that, once the product is cooked, the weight will be much less than the original.

Two maybe three years ago I bought a bag of Chicken Jerky at Cost - Co thinking it would be a healthy treat for my Pug, after eating these treats I noticed he Mugsy would drink water like he could not get enough... Then one night he kept coming to me with his ears laid back and hanging with a look in his eye that I knew something was wrong, went to my daughters house as she is really into dogs and hoping she could figure it out, well she noticed he could not pee no matter how much he tried, so rushed him to the vet, thank God, had I waited he would have died as his bladder was full of crystals and was near rupturing, anyway the vet catheterized him after putting him under anesthesia as it was so painful, after all was said and done and $ 1, ooo.oo later, he ended up on a special diet which we kept him on for well over a year... decided to try a good, but less expensive dog food, had his urine checked and he was doing fine... I believe it was the chicken jerky and the salt content, but of course I can not be sure and I do not remember the brand... Thankfully he has had no more occurrences, needless to say he does not get chicken jerky anymore and definitely nothing from China at least not that I kChicken Jerky at Cost - Co thinking it would be a healthy treat for my Pug, after eating these treats I noticed he Mugsy would drink water like he could not get enough... Then one night he kept coming to me with his ears laid back and hanging with a look in his eye that I knew something was wrong, went to my daughters house as she is really into dogs and hoping she could figure it out, well she noticed he could not pee no matter how much he tried, so rushed him to the vet, thank God, had I waited he would have died as his bladder was full of crystals and was near rupturing, anyway the vet catheterized him after putting him under anesthesia as it was so painful, after all was said and done and $ 1, ooo.oo later, he ended up on a special diet which we kept him on for well over a year... decided to try a good, but less expensive dog food, had his urine checked and he was doing fine... I believe it was the chicken jerky and the salt content, but of course I can not be sure and I do not remember the brand... Thankfully he has had no more occurrences, needless to say he does not get chicken jerky anymore and definitely nothing from China at least not that I kchicken jerky and the salt content, but of course I can not be sure and I do not remember the brand... Thankfully he has had no more occurrences, needless to say he does not get chicken jerky anymore and definitely nothing from China at least not that I kchicken jerky anymore and definitely nothing from China at least not that I know of.

Much cheaper than using good cuts of chicken meat but less digestible.

Product C lists chicken as first ingredient (again, this still includes about 75 % water) but the much less desirable chicken byproducts in dehydrated meal form - the finished product will contain much less «real» chicken than byproducts.

Leilani's On the Beach, located just on the opposite side of the Village's beach entrance from the Hula Grill offers a more casual (and less expensive) dinner menu featuring island cuisine with chicken, chops, fish, prime rib, steaks and much more.

Small chicken carcass... halve the ingredients... if you have fresh herbs, so much the better... some people add cloves, chillies etc... less of this... more of that... No Garlic... used dried garlic, celery salt — whatever... Experiment!

One theory as to why avian flu hasn't spread as much from chickens to humans in West Africa is that Nigeria and neighbors are warmer and there's more space, so people don't have to keep their chickens in their houses — meaning they breathe less chicken feces and dander, etc..

There should be support for things that will better define climate response to forcing, like better quality aerosol data and better cloud data, but much less for duplicative modeling efforts, studies that use wildly uncertain models to make wildly uncertain predictions, and silly chicken - little scare - story studies of utter doom.

But over its full life cycle — from chicken feed to poop to energy — it produces electricity with much less global warming pollution, so it's better for the climate.