Sentences with phrase «much less cloud»

Not exact matches

The entire antivirus industry was behind the curve in creating a cloud - native security platform that looked much more like Salesforce and a lot less like Sibel.

«The rest was largely generated by mining itself and, to a much lesser extent, by collecting management fees from the mining pools it operates and renting out the mining power of its mining farms through cloud services.»

Practically every Echo device, plus the Cloud Cam, are now selling for much less than their original price.

It can be urged that I Enoch implies that the Son of man will be revealed as judge from heaven to earth, but it is nowhere definitely stated that he «comes», much less that he «comes with the clouds of heaven».

This surprising discovery could explain why some volcanic clouds contain much less sulphur dioxide than might be expected.

Hence, the clouds that form at colder temperatures — if any form at all — contain much less suspended water in the form of ice crystals, the starting sites for snow crystal formation.

Much less is known about native ices in this group than in the long - haul comets from the Oort Cloud.

«For example, Biological Sciences units work much better in Terms 1 and 4 when the weather is warmer; Earth and Space Sciences work better for us in south - east Queensland in Term 3, when there's less chance of cloud and more variety of weather types.»

it do nt matter too me what u paying for but if those are the reason to not get this you should think about how much memory is 32gb, 64 gb and cloud storage also you do nt need a huge battery for a 4.7 inch screen because it consume less power

Lower relative humidity means less clouds; how much less, I couldn't tell; clouds are tricky and also the big unknown in current models.

About humidity, rainfall, and cloud cover much less is known.

Nobody wants wells to run dry, villages to starve, storm clouds to gather or levees to break, but yet not everybody cares to clean up the mess we've made, much less recognize that we've made a mess, and ensure that our kids inherit a world that is a testament to your munificence.

Solar is much less likely to have driven the rise than expect only 5 years ago (0.1 w / m ^ 2 Wang 2005 slightly less with Svalggard 2007 Perminger 2010) and aerosols have the largest uncertainty (when you include cloud albedo).

Before that could happen, the atmosphere would be so full of cloud, which would prevent solar flux reaching the surface, that the maximum surface temperature would be much less than 100C.

I noticed that the change in cloud cover from the minimum to maximum of the solar cycle was 2 percent, much less than the 10 % change in CO2, over the period of their study.

Climate models projecting that much less sunlight will be reflected by low clouds when the climate warms indicate that CO2 concentrations can only reach 470 ppm before the 2 ℃ warming threshold of the Paris agreement is crossed — a CO2 concentration that will probably be reached in the 2030s.

There should be support for things that will better define climate response to forcing, like better quality aerosol data and better cloud data, but much less for duplicative modeling efforts, studies that use wildly uncertain models to make wildly uncertain predictions, and silly chicken - little scare - story studies of utter doom.

Cumulus clouds will have the same effect, but more in balance with the positive effects, resulting in less negative net feedback, but with the same result, much lower climate sensitivity than the IPCC would have you believe.I realize that climate sensitivity is not usually discussed as a local phenomenon, but it should be, since it is the integral of all local phenomena.

The stable air that causes the ultra-cold conditions where polar stratospheric clouds form in Antarctica is much less likely.

Part way there, but no quantitation yet: of the 3.77 W / m ^ 2 radiated back dowwnard, most goes to increased rate of evaporation of the water at the surface, and much less goes to increased mean temp increase at the surface; hence increased rate of non-radiative transfer of heat from surface to upper atmosphere, slight increase in rainfall as hydrological cycle is faster, and slight increase in cloud cover.

CO2 is indeed a greenhouse gas, but much less important than the major greenhouse gas, water vapor (H2O) and clouds.

this will cause a shift in cloud formation and condensation causing some places to get much cooler whilst other countries might get some GH benefit - even though they will see less sun...

Conversely, during periods of lesser sunspot activity (e.g., during much of the 19th Century, the late - 1950s to mid-1970s and the last 15 years) albedo would increase — a consequence of more cloud cover over the oceans and continents.

Based on it's location it probably has much less interference from cloud cover than other places so that's good here, but you should be aware that performance might be limited elsewhere.

A major scientific study conducted at the University of Reading on the interactions between aerosols and clouds is much weaker than most climate models assume, meaning the planet could warm way less than predicted.

It elected not to simulate an amplifying effect, much less introduce dynamic cloud feedback to warming and solar radiation.

I'm still struggling to see why a permament cloud of aerosols from a nearby volcano is unable to measurably cool the surface but much less powerful chimney stacks are able to cool sorrounding regions to the extent that this cancels GHG warming.globally.

on the other hand, CO2 intercepts small amount of sunlight high up, where cooling is much more efficient — as a result small amount LESS of the sunlight comes to the ground = same as the H2O cloud effect - > brings day / night's temp closer = less extrLESS of the sunlight comes to the ground = same as the H2O cloud effect - > brings day / night's temp closer = less extrless extreme.

I suspect that the effect of doubling CO2 will be less than 2C and that much more will be learned about clouds, other aerosols, and the sun in the next 20 years.

Cumulus clouds will have the same effect, but more in balance with the positive effects, resulting in less negative net feedback, but with the same result, much lower climate sensitivity than the IPCC would have you believe.

I'm not even a regular scientist, much less a (sound of choir, ray of sunlight from parted clouds) «CLIMATE Scientist», so don't really know what goes on behind the curtain, but I will say that it is increasingly apparent to me that much of «science» (save that bastion of purity, mathematics), has been corrupted by greed, a political agenda (whose operatives are dupes of the former, really, viz..

Furthermore, IPCC has not even reported, much less analyzed, a total cloud cover by integrating the fractional cloud cover over the cells.

Do as I did and go outside to observe slow moving cumulus clouds as they prepare to rain — they get much darker underneath because less light gets into the top!

With that as the median of a reasonable prior, the empirical evidence comes down on the side of a value less than 2; this is especially true if the prior includes negative values for ECS, which is possible on some of the much debated effects of clouds.

energy budget is much less dependent on the shortwave scattering component which makes up the bulk of uncertainty with cloud feedback.

With apologies to my high - energy physics colleagues and to NASA, basic natural systems monitoring is much less expensive than high - energy colliders, fusion reactor research or manned Mars missions, but will help to provide better understanding of the lesser known parts of climate and hydrologic systems (aerosols, clouds, large - scale climate connections, S. Hemisphere data, etc).

So, the 729.9 W / m ^ 2 shown during the hours just before and after noon on a dry clear - sky day should be reading somewhat below 729.9 / (1 — 0.313) or less than 1062 W / m ^ 2 by measurement, near noon, on the equator, for the atmosphere itself, in those conditions, would not be absorbing as much direct solar radiation as the average shows in column C either (no clouds).

However, much less than 30 % of that reaches the surface and is available for surface heating because of scattering and absorption by the atmosphere and scattering by clouds; it is probably even lower for the oceans because of equatorial cloudiness and plankton using light for photosynthesis instead of it resulting in heating of the water.

Sure, you won't find many cloud software providers who have been around for five years, much less fifteen, but you must learn what you can.

If the cloud - based solution costs much less, you are likely comparing apples to apples.

It's now much more practical to use technologies from the cloud with much less cost and effort and with fast results.

While the legal community is all a» buzz over the possibilities offered by Cloud Computing, there are really little in the way of standards, much less comprehensive legal ethics opinions, that deal with the parameters of lawyers» and law offices» use of the cloud within the scope of legal pracCloud Computing, there are really little in the way of standards, much less comprehensive legal ethics opinions, that deal with the parameters of lawyers» and law offices» use of the cloud within the scope of legal praccloud within the scope of legal practice.

Cloud gaming services like OnLive and Gaikai are a way to bring modern PC games on much less powerful hardware than what you'd normally need if you installed the game on your own PC.

The Alpha is also significantly heavier and hotter than the original Cloud, making it much less comfortable during marathon gaming sessions.

The Nest Cam Outdoor costs less up front and has a much easier install, but its required cloud plans are more expensive.

Cloud mining's been a bit of a sketchy industry for the past few years, insofar as scams have abounded and many have argued that it's much less profitable than either 1) investing directly into cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether, and 2) investing in your own mining rig.

Practically every Echo device, plus the Cloud Cam, are now selling for much less than their original price.

Cloud gaming services like OnLive and Gaikai are a way to bring modern PC games on much less powerful hardware than what you'd normally need...

under 10 units) or property management companies with a modest number of properties under their charge, coming in as much as $ 15 per month less than Property Manager Cloud and potentially $ 35 less per month than Buildium.»