Sentences with phrase «much less minutes»

But it's solely up to him to produce regardless of how much less minutes he plays.

Not exact matches

Think about how much money you spend on new customer acquisition — is it less than $ 4 and a couple minutes of your time?

William confided that he couldn't make it five minutes much less 20 so we dialed it back to 30 seconds.

Our easy - to - use, ultra-secure online application takes only a few minutes to complete, and approval takes no more than two business days, typically much less.

Traders must remember that trading short expiry times of 1 minute or less requires much discipline and great skill.

He could start an iPhone repair business and charge much less than the competition, but still make a $ 40 profit on a repair that would only take 15 minutes!

you imply something that takes much time when prayer only takes a minute or even less... second... I Never said one can completely tuen them out... don't tell me to update my degree..

«To me, organic faith looks less like a tidy, three - minute testimony and more like seeds strewnacross so much time.

one must be struck at the constant union of religious ideas with patriotic sentiments, which so strongly characterize the [American] citizens... but what is no less worthy of remark is that their religion, freed from minute ceremonies, resembles a sentiment, as much as their love of liberty resembles a creed.

-LSB-...] whatever you really need to do to is much less than two minutes having a solitary simply click on gluten free dieting.

Bear in mind that your pasta is cooking in much less liquid than usual, so it will need frequent stirring and maybe a couple of extra minutes than the time specified on the box.

Is there such a thing - its like a delicacy in this house:) So with my mashed potato fish cakes you get dinner in less than 30 minutes and a pleased (Oh we love you so much, is there anything we can do for you mom?)

Use a name brand (these are most often vegan, though it doesn't hurt to check the ingredients), and make sure to give it a good 45 minutes to an hour to thaw out — not less, and ideally, not much more.

When I tested it with a toothpick at 15 minutes the toothpick was completely wet from the middle to about halfway to the edges, so I didn't think anything less than that would be baked enough but I guess even that was too much

What puzzled me though is that you cook the lentis for so long — no matter what kind I use, they're always very much done after 10 - 15 minutes, and the sweet potatoes need less cooking time, too.

She would spend so much time making this cake and the fam would devour the entire pan in less than 15 minutes - we're 6!

Keep in mind, a boneless roast will cook much faster, maybe 15 to 20 minutes less than a bone - in.

- Sheet Pan Chipotle Steak Fajitas is a simple dinner with so much flavor, made in less than 30 minutes.

Miso Kimchi Nachos w / Cashew Cheese Sauce Serves 2 - 4 (depending on how much you want to stuff your face - Sebastian and I devoured these in about 5 minutes flat) * Cashew Cheese Sauce is adapted from YumUniverse - this post:) Ingredients Cashew Cheese Sauce 1/2 cup raw cashews, soaked for at least 2 hours3 tbsp nutritional yeast2 tbsp lemon juice (about 1/2 a lemon) 2 cloves of garlic1 / 2 cup water1 tsp salt1 tbsp miso paste Nachos a TON of tortilla chips4 stalks of kale, washed and roughly chopped1 yellow bell pepper, dicedapproximately 1/2 cup Kim Chi, add more or less to taste (I am obsessed with Alchemy Pickle Company's Bok Choy Kim Chi) Notes To prepare cheese sauce, drain the water from the soaking cashews and add the cashews to a blender.

* I like to let my frozen fruit sit in the blender for a few minutes so it blends with less liquid (makes for a thicker consistency) Toppings and Bottomings Rawnola or Granola As Much Chopped Fresh Fruit As You Like Coconut Shreds

Dinner was ready in less than 45 minutes... thank you very much.

This Homemade Honey Almond Butter is paleo, gluten - free, ready in less than 10 minutes, and so much better than the store - bought kind!

This is pretty much a full meal in itself and can be on the table in less than 20 minutes.

The second reason is because I enjoy making snacks that I know others can make in less than 10 minutes (most of the time) and prefer those that don't require too much oven time.

(I owned a food mill that saw the light of day for a total of about five minutes, when a fancy food magazine convinced a much younger and less knowledgeable me that I wasn't a serious cook until I had one.

If you do a single layer you will need less baking time, so be sure to start checking around 15 minutes into baking to make sure it doesn't dry out too much.

Oh and again - this recipe will take you 5 - 10 minutes from fridge to bowl, much less time than it'd take to drive to your store, unless of course the store is right next door.

When you push the score up to an 11 - point lead with less than 2 minutes to play, and Houston out of TOs you pretty much put it out of reach.

Kieran Gibbs had to watch from the bench as the England boss gave the whole 90 minutes to the steady but unexciting Ryan Bertrand from Southampton and Theo Walcott did not do much better, with less than 10 minutes at the end of the game despite England never looking like scoring.

For teams coming from low - lying areas, it can be quite an ordeal playing a full 90 minutes when there is much less oxygen available than they are used to.

Stoke, who have already beaten Chelsea and Manchester City at the Britannia Stadium this season, were much the better side in the early stages of the match and they thoroughly deserved their lead, which was doubled less than 10 minutes later by a powerful effort from outside the penalty area from Marko Arnautovic.

Instead of getting in the car, driving to the store sometimes miles away, walking around the shop looking for the item, purchasing it and driving all the way home taking a few hours in the process, we can literally hop on our PC's or tablets and in much less time (minutes) we can achieve the same things, even more.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The difference between this year and last is that WCS played more minutes, got much more touches (due to the system), and took more, less efficient shots.

Of course there is always the chance that the story is wrong or that this asking price is just a bit of opportunism on the part of the Magpies and the French star will complete a transfer for much less but at the minute we have to at least consider the possibility that the north east club will not sell for less.

His overall score over 90 minutes this year was 38.67 and that is not quite as good as the 40.39 from last year and much worse than the 70.21 of his first season, so does this actually show that Ozil is getting worse or having less of an impact as time goes on?

Surprisingly we had less possession than them in the first 20 minutes and that suggests how much we miss Arteta at the heart of midfield.

There isn't much to savor from Team USA's 3 — 2 overtime loss to Slovenia on the opening day of the Olympic men's hockey preliminary round in PyeongChang, in which the Americans spoiled a 2 — 0 lead with under 15 minutes to play and then yielded a tap - in winner when all three defenders were caught puck - watching less than a minute into overtime.

Pace has skyrocketed recently (meaning a lot more miles traveled per minute, leading to more total distance per minute and also higher average speed so less time resting those legs at slow speed) and also defenses now have to be everywhere (before defense wasn't as tiring as it's now because every player didn't need to cover as much ground as they do now).

However, with Seydou Keita, William Vainqueur and Miralem Pjanic all exiting the equation this past summer, and with little other than Gerson standing in his way, Paredes became the de facto fourth midfielder, though his minutes and role were far from assured much less defined.

Obviously Özil has been a relentless engine of creativity for the Gunners this season, making an absolutely staggering 119 chances in the Premier League (at an average of 4.27 per - 90 minutes), but Payet has been almost as creative in a much less potent West Ham side.

I can commit to shorter showers, but I have long, thick, super curly hair, I (literally) could not get all of my hair wet in less than 3 minutes, much less lathered, rinsed, and conditioned, and then there's actually bathing, another 3 - 5 minutes (I happen to have a small shower, I could not possibly extend my arms even halfway standing in the middle, which believe it or not, adds time to my shower, trying to maneuver in a tiny space) I will commit to trying to get my time down below 30 minutes, though.

I've seen you object in comments to parents who say they only needed a few nights or even 15 minutes of CIO to get to a child who cries less and sleeps much better.

I skip showers so much that I really need to wash thoroughly (mostly my hair) by the time I get around to it My husband and I both already spend significantly less than 5 minutes a day in the shower on average — I think that's in line with the spirit of this challenge, if not the specific rules

That 15 minutes was much less crying than we went through with any of the «no cry» methods.

But the electric pump can dish you know milk out in a short amount of time but it usually has less compression for a minute the suck may not be as strong like a baby so you're output may not be as much as if you were to hand express or even to manual pump.

So much pressure relieved, but now my contractions were even more erratic spanning from 21 minutes apart to less than 40 seconds.

I couldn't help much with the pushing (slightly crooked spine; uneven epidural), but i didn't need to; my uterus had the baby out in less than twenty minutes.

It can just be 10 - 15 minutes and sometimes less, but the trip seems to go so much smoother without unrealistic plans to just push through to get somewhere as fast as possible.

If they fall asleep at the breast after less than 5 minutes, they probably are too sleepy to really have gotten much milk, but might appear relaxed.