Barents Sea numbers have probably increased since 2005 and have definitely not declined despite
much less sea ice cover.
For several thousand years, there was
much less sea ice in the Arctic Ocean — probably less than half of current amounts....
Not exact matches
«We can also combine that data with projections of
sea ice, to predict how
much more or
less it will cost these animals to make a living over the next century,» Fischbach says.
It had
much higher
sea levels, forests extended all the way to the Arctic Ocean, and there was almost certainly a lot
less sea ice.
He said that sensitivity includes water vapour and arctic
sea ice, but I suspect that the changes in
sea ice in the models are
much less than we are seeing in practice.
That is a major change in
sea currents, warming, wildlife, coastal erosion, and
much less solar energy being bounced back into space by
ice that in not there.
The global mean temperature rise of
less than 1 degree C in the past century does not seem like
much, but it is associated with a winter temperature rise of 3 to 4 degrees C over most of the Arctic in the past 20 years, unprecedented loss of
ice from all the tropical glaciers, a decrease of 15 to 20 % in late summer
sea ice extent, rising sealevel, and a host of other measured signs of anomalous and rapid climate change.
In his seminal 1982 book Climate, History, and the Modern World, the renown climatologist Dr. H.H. Lamb revealed that
sea ice in the subarctic and Arctic regions was
much less extensive during the Medieval Warm Period (9th - 13th centuries) compared to today.
The findings suggest that while the response of Antarctic summer
sea ice to human - caused climate change may be
less dramatic than in the Arctic,
sea ice cover may have declined by as
much as 14 % over the last 100 years.
If thermal expansion is no longer contributing, you would expect either
less total
sea level rise or a
much greater contribution from melting
ice.
Increased melting of
sea ice did occur in the 1920s and 1930s in the Barents Sea (Ifft, Monthly Weather Review, November, 1922, p. 589) and over the Arctic Basin (Ahlmann, 1949, Rapports et Proces - Verbaux des Revions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 125, 9 - 16) but it was much less so than in recent yea
sea ice did occur in the 1920s and 1930s in the Barents
Sea (Ifft, Monthly Weather Review, November, 1922, p. 589) and over the Arctic Basin (Ahlmann, 1949, Rapports et Proces - Verbaux des Revions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 125, 9 - 16) but it was much less so than in recent yea
Sea (Ifft, Monthly Weather Review, November, 1922, p. 589) and over the Arctic Basin (Ahlmann, 1949, Rapports et Proces - Verbaux des Revions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 125, 9 - 16) but it was
much less so than in recent years.
Its simple, winter was
much smaller in extent, mimicking directly the
lesser volume of Arctic
sea ice.
Simple physics dictates that with
less sea ice there is magnified warming of the Arctic due to powerful albedo feedback; this in turn reduces the equator to pole temperature gradient which slows the jet stream winds causing them to become more meridional; this combined with 4 % more water vapor in the atmosphere (compared to 3 decades ago) is leading to
much more extremes in weather.
It is important to note that although the
sea ice has changed greatly in the past few decades, it has changed
much less during the polar breeding season.
Apart from these last concerns, the WAIS is
much less worrying than the GIS, because the huge thermal inertia and albedo effect of the EAIS, the antarctic continent itself, and the large amount of antarctic
sea ice in the southern winter, all act to reduce the degree of warming for the WAIS (whereas the GIS is the victim of various unfortunate circumstances which amplify warming there).
Also
less ice cover allows the vastly warmer
sea water to warm the
much colder arctic air.
Research indicates that the Arctic had substantially
less sea ice during this period compared to present Current desert regions of Central Asia were extensively forested due to higher rainfall, and the warm temperate forest belts in China and Japan were extended northwards West African sediments additionally record the «African Humid Period», an interval between 16,000 and 6,000 years ago when Africa was
much wetter due to a strengthening of the African monsoon While there do not appear to have been significant temperature changes at most low latitude sites, other climate changes have been reported.
If the opposite happened and there was too
much sea ice, then foraging trips took longer and penguin chicks were
less likely to survive.
Actually since
ice is pretty
much freshwater and hence
less dense, when it melts in
sea water the
sea level will rise but only by a very small amount.
Recent evidence of faster rates of global
sea - level rise suggests that these projections may be too low.3, 4,5 Given recent accelerated shrinking of glaciers and
ice sheets, scientists now think that a rise of 2.6 feet (80 centimeters) is plausible — and that as
much as 6.6 feet (2 meters) is possible though
less likely.16
Prior to 1978, satellite measurements of
sea ice extent are not available and the data is
much less reliable.
Actually the argument makes more sense applied to the arctic
sea ice — both in winter and summer, since it is at a
much higher average latitude and therefore affects albedo
much less.
When oceans get cold, and the surface of polar waters freezes, it snows
much less and the sun takes away
ice and limites the lower bound of temperature and
sea level.
Heat from Arctic amplification over normal conditions in these regions is
much smaller than on the other side of the pack because the
ice covered these
seas longer this year; The heat added due to Arctic amplification probably
less than 6... and with most of that in the Beaufort, and not in the Chukchi and E. Siberian.
But deep water production by convection may be
less, depending on how
much NADW is Arctic in origin and how
much is simply recirculated Antarctic bottom water (extremely dense water, formed as brine under the
sea ice around polynas offshore of Antarctica and sliding down the continental shelf into the depths without
much mixing, creates a giant pool of dense water extending all the way up the bottom of the Atlantic to about 60 ° N).
But the influence of the release of heat - trapping gases is
much less clear with
sea ice around the South Pole.
In contrast, the larger East Antarctic
ice sheet sits almost entirely on bedrock above
sea level, making it
much less susceptible to climate change.
They found that open oceans are
much less efficient than
sea ice when it comes to emitting in the far - infrared region of the spectrum, a previously unknown phenomenon that is likely contributing to the warming of the polar climate.
NSIDC scientists point out why we shouldn't be reading too
much into one summer of
less sea ice decline.
When the climate was
much warmer,
sea levels would have been substantially higher, because
less water would've been locked up as
ice.
If
sea ice cover was 50 %
less 5,000 years ago and polar bears were very
much alive and well, it is hard to see how claims of their extinction are credible from future
ice loss.
Hansen and Sato (7) argue that the climate of the most recent few decades is probably warmer than prior Holocene levels, based on the fact that the major
ice sheets in both hemispheres are presently losing mass rapidly (9) and global
sea level is rising at a rate of more than 3 m / millennium (25), which is
much greater than the slow rate of
sea level change (
less than 1 m / millennium) in the latter half of the Holocene (26).