Sentences with phrase «much less significance»

Chalkbeat's Matt Barnum writes that, under ESSA, schools «across the country are about to be held accountable for student attendance — attaching stakes to a measure that previously had much less significance and increasing the risk that schools will try to manipulate that data.»

In my opinion having a Breezing unit is far more important than using a fitness tracker alone because without an accurate resting metabolism the calories burned from exercise has much less significance.

Not exact matches

As I hope is evident, none of the above meant to reduce or dispute the cultural significance, much less the real orientation towards peace of «A Common Word».

Maltin contextualizes The Mickey Mouse Club by recalling the significance of a one - hour daily children's program in a simpler age with much less media to choose from.

I suspect we're talking around the same topic, getting at it in different ways, in our own terms, preferring our own conceptualization of it yet overlapping so much that whatever differences there may have less practical significance for authors than recreation for you and me.

«I hardly understand anything, much less anything important, but my inclination must, or seems to have, some significance in the world in which I am living.»

In fact, it would not be too much to say that the artistic significance of the stripe paintings consists in nothing more (or less) than their willingness to expose themselves to that critique.

It seems Poole's point, however, is less that this congruence has any major significance, but that it's riddled with contradictions and inconsistency — as so much nature - worship surely is — and is a bit, well, daft.

Well then, I guess I fail to see any climatic (much less climactic) significance to Briffa's Yamal series.

The best experts can not judge, how much bias they themselves have, even less can they convince others that their bias is of little significance.

In that I noted that being able to combine two time series to one of much less variability using only two free parameters (as I have understood that you use) is an interesting approach that's likely to help in interpreting the significance of the time series.

It was Fisher who suggested 95 % to be the level of significance for much statistical work, but if you read Fisher you'll see that he understood that for some fields much greater than 95 % should be asked for, and in other, less.

There's not even enough data to calculate the statistical significance of the relationship between the two tiny datasets, much less determine its meaning.

While I was less aware at that point of MLB's significance and its singular role in the creation of much - needed regional reporting series, I had the pleasure later on of learning the history and of collaborating with MLB in yet another example of their commitment to supporting professional and public access to the law.