Sentences with phrase «much means players»

This pretty much means players on a team can attack the opponent one after the other in quick succession so the enemy has no time to counter.

Not exact matches

By definition, when you set out to disrupt you're taking aim at an existing market — which means pitting yourself against large, established players that have much greater resources and reach.

That means it's doubtful the NFL will offer exclusive or near exclusive rights to an internet player no matter how much they bid.

Also, it is possible they are operating in a vertical where every player is link building at once — meaning that the «climb uphill» is much harder, and results more difficult to come by.

We really need to ask ourselves: Can we enjoy the big game, even if it means in 30 years these players won't be able to remember the plays that brought us so much joy?

While its great that faith means so much to these players, it would be nice if scoring touchdowns meant just as much to them, too.

He was our best players 2 seasons ago, and we knw ao much we missed hm last season nd d impact he made in the few games he played, I has shown how dangerous he can be too dis season, mybe he's not dat sharp yet, but bcos he doesn't get into d 1st 11 dis season doesn't mean he won't next season wen he will be available for preseason especially wen alexis won't be....

I mean crazier things have happened and players need to be cautious... Look how much of their prime playing years have players like mata, pedro, Oscar, Fellini, depay (delay), hart, toure, fabregas, etc have wasted because they didn't consider new managers appointment and instability in a club?

Wenger made the comment about keeping Gazidis on a leash and people assumed it meant not spending as much, for me it is to stop him from buying trash and clogging up the team with players not good enough for AFC, that leash worked well this year as we didn't panic buy a Perez.

Grimm is an amateur poker player — which means he plays poker for money but not for a living — and an amateur would have as much chance in the big poker game at the Horseshoe as Cadillac Jack would have of bringing in a wildcat oil well through the floor of the First National Bank building in Abilene, Texas, where the Grimm Oil Company is located.

Something is fundamentally wrong somewhere AFC, we think we know, we think it's all about buying players and all but I tell you, it's much more than that... if our legends are turning us down now, does that mean Henry [the player] wouldn't sign for us if the hands of the clock were turned back?

Seri I very much doubt, many interested parties means there will be bidding war and player will have a big call

i don't think the players mentality could get much worse than it is already and i for one would like to see Arsenal fail every step of the way if it means Kroenke is forced to sell and we get a new manager.

What do you mean you do nt expect him to be good as De Gea.Why do you know anyone's future.If I was to be very honest with you even if we keep Ospina and sell Szczesny i do nt see him also becoming an all time great.To me he should go to Roma where i believe he can become an all time great.He is better than Ospina in terms of skill in goalkeeping but what makes Ospina better than him is that he acts more matured.You guys keep bringing up stats but we can all bring up stats for even a player who might not be better than another player but stats will make him look much better.Even hits stats show he is legendary but in actual sense he is not legendary.If u think am lying or talking too much lets Keep Ospina and sell Szcz and lets see.

That means they lost better players, and they also have capable backups who didn't have much game experience to replace them.

However, it doesn't appear as though he'll have much success with an enquiry for Pulisic, as Dortmund's intention is pretty clear in that they wish to keep him at the club for as long as possible and not view him as a means of making a healthy profit on a player that they've played a key role in developing.

This could well mean that a third Leicester City player has snubbed the advances of our club in this window, following Jamie Vardy's much - publicised decision not to leave his current club, while Kante preferred to join Chelsea.

Outside of getting paid an exorbitant amount of money, signing with a brand like Nike carries a level of validation that means as much as signing your first contract as a professional player.

I mean there is nothing wrong with wanting your players to have an opinion and to speak their minds, but I just find it ironic that pretty much every player from the Seahawks locker room comes with the added report of being a loud mouth, vociferous, childish, outspoken, or cocky.

All of the picks made today have bonuses that will impact a team's budget, as they only have so much money to spend on picks in the first 10 rounds, and failure to sign a player means they lose that pick's chunk of the spending pool.

DENIAL that the squad remains weighed down by players who are not the right standard and are paid too much meaning that other more suitable Clubs don't want them DENIAL that the only reason Ozil is likely to sign a new contract is down to the fact that no other Club would pay him the same salary on top of any form of transfer fee (same as the «deadwood really»..

I mean, who cares how much «athleticism» a player has or doesn't have when what counts is play during a game?

This thing is being given too much attention.There a lot of players Arsenal passed up on that Mourinho may have also signed you know.In fact there a lot of top players who Arsenal passed up on signing when they were young and for some even matured.Does this mean they aren't good enough?Wenger even regrets passing up on certain players.The fact is that everyone has his basis for signing or not signing a player.Clearly, Wenger and Mourinho both have their basis on whether Lacazette was good enough.One player who is deemed average to another team could be deemed useless to another team.I just don't know why much attention is being given to this thing.One thing I know for sure is Laca is a good finisher and that's alk he needs this season.If Lacazette brings his finishing boots this season it's going to be goals galore.

With Cazorla suspended, however, the other player in the centre for Arsenal, maybe Ramsey, might offer a bit more help defensively and that might mean we could use Arteta without putting too much pressure on his aging legs.

I guess this means that the FO did not see him as a long term solution or that they think they can come up with a better player without too much trouble.

its ridiculous and embarrassing and goes to show that the real agenda from both wenger and the board is keeping the books straight its the continual party line of «in the summer, we'll do this» then the player is unavailable there used to be a time not that long ago when you knew that whoever they brought in was going to be class, now you know that whoever they bring in will be cheap and wont do much of a job, Sanchez has been the only real good bit of transfer business and I mean really good bit since we were supposed to be free of financial restraints makes you wonder if we ever really had any as its still not changed.

He is a football purist who values the art of football and fair play too much to win by any means necessary and he transmits these values to his players.

There's so much wrong with Arsenal if we were given chances to write about them it would take a year.What kind of mentality is this.Forgive me for the way I come out but what has to be said has to be said and the truth hurts.I do nt know if you guys are happy with what's going on but am not.We live in a world where those who speak the truth are hated very much and a world full of incomprehensible things.Its just sad.Things have to change from this year especially the mentality of this club.I just wan na see my club succeed and its bothering me a lot we just can not seem to do what is right.It's time average players are taken out of the club and what I mean by that is players who do nt want to improve.You already them lot.

IMO I feel that neither will improve much further than they have and this means that we MUST get in a player that hits the middle ground and who is a proven player, it takes the weight off of both Theo and OG while allowing them the space to show what they can really do.

Now why do people hate arsenal players so much, the penalty cazorla scored, two former keeper comes out complaining, one saying why he did not do it last week or do it when it meant.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

Despite a bit of early nervousness, the Gunners did well to stay compact and deny the City players any time or space with the ball, but that also meant we were not doing much at the other end and were largely relying on a quick counter attack which Alexis nearly produced a couple of times in the first 15 minutes.

Sanchez just keeps losing the ball, I mean he loses the ball too often and he tries to do too much with the ball instead of making a decent pass, when it works out it is quality but when it doesn't it just disgusts me, I am not taking anything from his performance today, but he is our best player on the pitch, its high time he started acting like it... and Rosicky for MOTM

It was just nine holes in an event that will not mean much in the larger 2016 picture for the No. 1 player, but a bogey - free 3 - under 33 was a fine way to start.

Bought from Southampton for # 16m, injuries to key players has meant that Chambers has played much more than many expected and has done well.

players who wont be in 25 man squad are Joel Campbell Chuba Akpom Carl Jenkinson Mathieu Debuchy and chambers is most likely going to c.palace so we are pretty much set in squad trimming, now if we buy a player he will take someone place e.g buying seri means replacing elneny, draxler for perez.

I understand the logic behind your thinking and I agree, this could be lethal, but it then means wilshere ramsey flamini and arteta are bench players or have to be sold because none of them can operate as the sole midfielder in front of our back four, arteta is probably the most well rounded for this but against better opposition I don't think he has the physique or pace to really command that area, he has the intelligence to read the game but without the other attributes he can only do so much.

I do not want to think too much about what a Chelsea win over Arsenal tomorrow would mean to Arsene Wenger and the players, but I think we have to.

as much as it pains me to say it, he does not have what it takes OR is basically scared and very lazy I mean its rediculous the club has an ethos of not spending big money on players that would make a difference but spend in excess of 360,000 per annum on a player that does NOTHING.

i'm a person who almost always seas the glass half full but even i'm not blind (no disrespect meant to blindness) AW constantly reminds us that deference between a top WC player and a good player its so minute that he believes it don, t make that much of a deference

Danny is a 15 minute player, after 15 minutes of each game he just disappears and all he does is run, close down, lose passes, he just does not give much as a striker, we down talk Giroud but he gives us more than danny, he will work hard, assist, score sometimes and bring this team mates into play... Welbeck has got the worst link up play ever, his first touch is so bad, whenever the ball gets to him we know it won't stick and that means he will be chasing down the ball due to his poor first touch.

By 6 players I mean 6 attacking players... And although I don't know much about bayern players... But i'm pretty sure that they will not have 6 attacking players out injured... Ribery And Gotze Are the only ones IMO...

So wait a minute.Are Arsenal looking for a defensive midfielder or a box to box player.I'm really disappointed in Xhaka's defending.He's very good with his long passing but I don't think he's the best option when it comes to box to box.In Arsenal he's normally used as the defensive midfielder particular deep lying playmaker and this actually means that we need someone who is fantastic at attacking and can also do very well defensively so as to compliment for Xhaka's defensive short comings.Ludo Goretzka is very good defensively from the little I've seen but I don't really know much about his attacking qualities.But I also hope Arsenal does not forget about Mario Lemina.He's a complete midfielder and to me has the capabilities to be one of Europe's best if given the chance.He can defend very well and attack very well.He's a player Juventus would regret selling.As for Goretzka I know he's very good defensively but have» t seen much of him in terms of attack.If he's as good as in attack I'd sign him.

I admit to not seeing much all of him but when a teenage foreign player is rated at over fifteen mil then it usually means there is definitely something there to be worked with.

I just don't get you guys at times.What's with all the hype?The downfall of a team is not dependent on whether the team's best player leaves or not.It's much more than that.People can not just say that if Arsenal sign Lacazette and Alexis leaves we wil not improve.People acting as if we've not had better players leave the club who we have survived without.It's funny how everyone is predicting doom if Alexis leaves but I wonder who will be shocked if we place 4th without him in the squad next season.It's not all about Alexis you.Transition is part of life so you you just have to take it as it comes.If you think Alexis» departure means Arsenal downfall you guys are all wrong.Now look how many are claiming Alexis is irreplaceable.Yet before he came many wouldn't have said that.Alexis is a replaceable player to me because someone might even come and do better.Look at him before he came and look at him now there's your evidence.Who did he replace?

This does nt mean a thing its a case of somneone told me that someone else said...... fill in the blanks, Iwobi is a great player BUT he's not a proven front man and if put in a position of extreme pressure could fold like a paper bag, its unfair on the kid to place him this role so early on in his career Also much like Welbecks promising end to the season which was cut short again he just is» nt the goal scoring monster that we really really need.

Which means a willingness to pay what they're worth & getting rid of Walcott would allow the club to offer as much to an incoming player: any of them above would be willing to talk for that amount of money & feel valued.

A bit unfair I know considering he hasn't played much but I haven't really been impressed with Campbell in Arsenal colours (some players are not just meant for certain teams — Di Maria for united, De Bryne for Chelsea, Hleb and Cesc for Barca, etc).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

By closing the window before the seasons commences, it encourages clubs to do their business earlier on in the summer, thus meaning that they have a much better chance of buying the player they want at reasonable price, and won't be forced to pay the extra # 10M - # 15M they would've had to pay to sign the player late on in the window.