Sentences with phrase «much money players»

Further, I urge the ESRB to consider working with the relevant stakeholders — including parents — to collect and publish data on how developers are using loot boxes, how widespread their use is, and how much money players spend on them.

Not exact matches

Ad tech firms are out of favor these days - too many players, too many unmet promises, too little transparency, too few successes, and too much money for nothing much to talk about in the way of results.

I would much like us to spend money on a player that will actually feature for most of the season not someone who'll link up with Diaby in the medic room, Hummels is a great player but his recent injury record is definitely not what we need.

They can choose to absorb most of the salary, which would give the Marlins the gift of financial relief, or they can add prospects and young players as a way to avoid absorbing that much money.

I agree, but I think we have players who got too much too early on their contracts without justifying half the money received (in some cases).

So even though Man City, Liverpool and Man United are all doing just as badly as Arsenal and a lot worse if you consider how much more money they have spent, it seems to be Wenger who is always in the press, on the verge of being sacked and with players and staff supposedly disagreeing with every decision the Prof makes.

He does not grasp the fact that all the dressing room will be talking about is where these players are going and how much money they will get.

Yes, I agree, it will give squad depth but if you buy a player for squad depth for 25 million then clearly you have too much money and you have no clue what to do with them.

Cazorla is far better than Ozil in my opinion... We wasted 42M to replace our best player (Cazorla was Arsenal best player the season before we bought Ozil)... Don't get me wrong, Ozil is good but we should have invest that money on a much needed position, maybe a striker (Bitty that the stubborn one didnot get Higuain for less than 30M) or a defender...

There were 55 players on that shortlist so it may not sound all that impressive that three of them were Arsenal stars, but that number does look better when you compare it with our Premier League rivals, especially when you consider how much more money the likes of Manchester United and Man City have been throwing around to build their squads.

My point is, like I said before, to get a top player, you pay top money imagine how much Palace is willing to pay for Batshuayi, even Chelsea...

Why we spent 35 M on Xhaka I will never understand - we needed mid field backups and not a first team player this season worth that much money.

The only problem is that Jason Bay and Oliver Perez were the players traded away, and both of them could have helped the Padres just as much, for a lot less money.

But if this was true, this just shows how much money matters to the club than trophies.Instead concentrating on getting players, they are wasting time in these matters.

Champions League 25m that how much Arsenal get as well as the money Wenger has in his left in his wallet for new players.

140.000 a week is too much for a bench player, we could get a very good player for that money.

Grimm is an amateur poker player — which means he plays poker for money but not for a living — and an amateur would have as much chance in the big poker game at the Horseshoe as Cadillac Jack would have of bringing in a wildcat oil well through the floor of the First National Bank building in Abilene, Texas, where the Grimm Oil Company is located.

I always expect players to try and get as much money as they possibly can, because then I can be pleasantly surprised if they give a hometown discount lol.

and probably wants a decent retirement signing money...... as much as no player is bigger than the club...... losing Alexis will affect Arsenal much more......... you can't continue to lose your best players at their peak...... and...... call yourself a big team............ it took an exceptional situation for Barcelona to let Neymar go.......

Arsenal don't have the power with neither Jack, nor Mesut and thus so need to cough up the money or the players won't sign, because a footballers career is short and as much as you love your club, when the offer comes you have to make the best decision for yourself.

I think it's plainly simple as to why Arsenal are where they are, and it's because since building the stadium and money being directed into this project over an extended period of time say 10 years (which I might add is understandable) the strategy then was to finish top four keep the funds coming in by finishing top four but not spending too much on players to see them through these years.

We can dream all we want about getting world class players in and we can have as much money to splash out on big name transfers but it is not going to happen until there is a change of manager.

Lastly Chelsea have one of the best youth development squads in the league, it is exactly how they avoid the FFP because they make so much player sales off young players not to mention there is a clause that money spent on youth development is exempt from analysis in the FFP

Imagine when England do start producing players of Cazorlas ilk, i wonder how much money theyl go for.

Exactly, our average players are making too much money.

Perhaps they pampered the players too much with big money and facilities

I was never try to insinuate that it's year 2000 in terms of spending and all that.Look at all the clubs you mentioned.They were Man Utd, Chelsea, Man wateva, PSG and Real Madrid.Arsenal has nothing on them when it comes to money for transfers.The majority of these clubs also chalk a lot of success or have very wealthy owners who own a higher percentage of shares which adds to the money already available for transfers.If they want to spend extravagantly let them do but not Arsenal.We must not compare ourselves to them in terms of spending.Lemar is a good player and I like him very much but he's just not worth # 80.

... Wenger can not understand that he has to pay for players more then 10 years ago... much much more, but Arsenal HAVE money to spend!

Being from India I thought only cricket is fixed but seeing the last two games how much ransome money our players have eaten.......

What's truly sad is that Arsenal are IMHO only a couple of really good players away from being genuine title contenders, regardless of how much the Superpowers spend yet puppet master Wenger and the mustached Mercenary Kroenke will never spend the necessary money.

In his first few matches he tried to impress fans by holding on to the ball for too long but it's normal, every big money players try as much as possible to impress fans....

Redknapp agrees with Wenger's idea that big money is being spent on average players and he specifically declares that # 60 million for the reported Arsenal target Alexandre Lacazette from Lyon or # 30 million for the Valencia defender Mustafi is too much.

Nabil Fakir will give us much more offensively than Ramsey.If Manure and Chelski offer the right sort of money let him go.Good player but we can get better for the money.

It really baffles me sometimes how fans like you portray Wenger and at the end I feel the day ya'all forget that Wenger is an employee of Arsenal and he's now bigger than the club, yes he's a legend and he deserves a statue but at the same time that is Arsenal's downfall because Wenger has too much control over the club and he shouldn't be allowed to make some decisions on like players to buy or the amount of money to spend, he has to just focus on football and only football alone.

We spend the money on Sterling and how much do we have left to bring in other players?

Outside of getting paid an exorbitant amount of money, signing with a brand like Nike carries a level of validation that means as much as signing your first contract as a professional player.

However of course it is generally considered the higher the price the better quality of player and if the Gunners do make a second big money signing this summer, Arsenal fans could be in for an exciting start to next season, that will be met with much eagerly awaited levels of anticipation.

All of the picks made today have bonuses that will impact a team's budget, as they only have so much money to spend on picks in the first 10 rounds, and failure to sign a player means they lose that pick's chunk of the spending pool.

«Money» plays a factor, but it's silly to say that money is the main reason the Vikings want a player back that they moved up in the draft for, invested so much time and development in, and has spent countless hours supporting his rMoney» plays a factor, but it's silly to say that money is the main reason the Vikings want a player back that they moved up in the draft for, invested so much time and development in, and has spent countless hours supporting his rmoney is the main reason the Vikings want a player back that they moved up in the draft for, invested so much time and development in, and has spent countless hours supporting his rehab.

The willingness to absorb that much money for a midseason deal, the ability to gamble on two expensive players who had red flags where ligaments should be, was unprecedented.

As a matter of fact, this is one of the main reasons for underperforming in last few years - the so called «British core» - overrated and low quality British players, well bellow, in quality, to foreigners.To spend 32 millions on 2 mediocre English players - Welbeck and Chambers - when you can get foreign «wizzards» for that type of money is suicidal.Now, go on an analyze how much Wilshere, Gibbs, Ox, Walcott and Ramsey helped the team to be the best in the last few years.And how much, for instance, did Sanchez in only few months.Alexis is better than all «British core» combined and cost a fraction of these overrated players.The time we get rid of the british players is the time we go back on top.Time will tell...

• Revis is not alone in his thoughts on the business of football, which are basically that players can want simultaneously to win and want to make as much money as possible.

If Wenger is guaranteed the revenue from the Champions League, it not only gives him more money to spend, but it will also make it much easier to convince world - class players that they are going to club with great prospects of more trophies in the very near future.

Porto are known for the masses of money from selling their players and replacing them with better options, so don't expect them to suffer much from losing the full - back and Martinez.

that's about eight players... still not sure about Wilshere and Cazorla... we waste so much money on wages...

Sylvain Distin is a good player who even in his advancing years has the ability, leadership and speed to still work out as very good cover for our centre backs, good news also that Portsmouth will take any money they can get at the moment so he wouldn't cost much.

The players were not making much money, and the fans were not spending much.

We do need strength in depth so clearly we can't look to allow all our replacements go but some will want to leave nonetheless and Daniel Levy has made it clear that he would like to recoup some money from player sales and two of these three could probably be allowed to be let go without it making too much of an impact at White Hart Lane.

The focus on labor peace — a lie former Commissioner and current Commissioner Emeritus Bud Selig loved to mention — helped bring the players here: There was too much union attention paid to veterans and the money they were already getting, and the money they would get once they hit free agency.

We do not have as much money as the top stars in the Premier League, but we have a lot of other things to offer — for example our players were able to celebrate Christmas.»