Not exact matches
For instance, you can break it down by device or placement you want to show up for (e.g. news feed or right column), you can define
more demographics such as income,
liquid assets, ethnicity, the type of car people drive, the household composition and
much more.
The common cap is $ 1 million in
liquid assets to invest as a definition because if you've got
much more, then you're obviously a millionaire and not part of the mass affluent crowd.
Illiquid
assets that are similar to a
liquid asset usually yield
more, because the cost of trading is
much higher, and the possibility of being trapped is higher also.
In general with stock ETFs that trade very
liquid markets this has historically not been
much of an issue, as the creation / redemption mechanism on these types of
assets is pretty robust: it's consequences on typical spread is
much more important for the average retail investor.
I find it interesting that people that are risk adverse always want to pay off their mortgages when in reality, paying off
assets that are not
liquid is
much more risky.
While
much of that money may initially be parked in
more liquid assets like US Treasury bonds and safe - haven currencies such as the Swiss franc, there is growing evidence that foreign property sales may receive a boost.
A tokenized
asset can be
much more liquid, transparent, and secure than the existing paper based
asset infrastructure.