Sentences with phrase «much more pace»

From a situation where we just couldn't buy a goal we've now scored eleven goals in our last four games and are starting to move the ball forward with much more pace and purpose than in previous weeks.

I'm not a professional football coach, but... when I see Ox and Campbell on the wings, it just seems we play with so much more pace.

It's gives us much more pace, aggression and defensive strength.

I can't see us winning this game, City have much more pace and trickery in their attack.

Not exact matches

Just how much, if any, of this course - correcting for consumers (read: lower prices) comes out of employees» hides (read: lower compensation, less training, a more oppressive pace) remains to be seen.

A startup by contrast doesn't have that stockpile of market experiences to help them accelerate the pace to the right answers, hence they need a much more comprehensive business plan outline to help them ask those early and important questions to get the ball rolling.

It's impossible to predict what could trigger this but candidates include a credit crunch in China and a much more aggressive pace of Federal Reserve tightening.

«I found it much more valuable to learn the material at my own time and pace,» he says.

Given its volatility, we have to be careful in giving this too much weight, but the trend in this measure has picked up recently from a 4 1/2 per cent pace to more than 5 per cent.

Since then it has been growing at a much more modest pace, closer to the rate of GDP growth.14

China is expected to grow in 2009, but at a much more modest pace.

The yield from the health REITs are pretty healthy assuming the distributions can continue at these paces while my DOV and ADM buys, though lower yielding, have much safer and more predictable dividend payments.

In other words, if correct, investors will be less willing to pay more for each dollar of earnings and stocks will climb at a much slower pace.

It might take you a few hours per post when you're starting but by a few weeks in and beyond you'll start pushing them out at a much faster pace, with more confidence, and at a higher level of quality.

Many accounts from the evolution based accounts of this picture did also happen as well but all these things did so at a much more rapid pace than anyone realizes and in some instances even thousands of times faster.

I want to see America move forward at a much more progressive pace than what we are presently doing because of the Opposition Republican Party who says NO to everything.

That said, I'm really looking forward to the events on the schedule this year, which will take me to West Virginia, Minnesota, Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, Georgia, and Alabama... and at a much more relaxed pace.

With existing customers asking us to do more, and new business on the horizon, we simply would not be able to keep pace without this much - needed expansion,» said Greiner.

As much as we were enjoying ourselves with the slow and tranquil pace of life in Brittany, I don't know if we could have survived 1 more week of surfing via a telephone line.

Dan added, «All of this relates back to how food manufacturers and processors can meet that continual shift in how consumers are buying, interacting and consuming food in much more of a convenient, fast - paced lifestyle and how they can meet that demand.»

Yeap, I have been putting it through its paces chopping, slicing, grating and mixing and much, much, more.

Pace has taken guys with high ceilings and disregarded the risk / low floors in the draft in the last 3 season but that doesn't mean he'll do it again now that the Bears are much more stable roster than when he took over.

Arteta does do a great job of keeping possession and dictating the pace of the game, but he is much more effective when Arsenal are playing the so - called lower clubs.

The Sanchez replacement and the one that has really got Arsenal fans on their feet was Pierre - Emerick Aubameyang, who, with his pace and excitement is a much more natural successor to Sanchez.

He gets at leaat as much credit for the success of the players and should get no more criticism than Pace for their failures.

Great game, thought France showed Germany too much respect, by dropping off and allowing them to dominate the game, but when France attacked t showed u Germany defense and if Giroud had an ounce more pace he could have gotten himself on the score sheet twice, but contribute to the two goals indirectly and directly.

On the right wing Theo is a much better option and a truer wide man with more pace and a better goal scorer.

He genuinely thinks his better than Meet — or (and I think this much more likely) he wants to play Gab against Leicester because of their pace.

More like he very much endeavours to cover for Per's lack of pace and agility, it often leaves our defence under pressure.

If you gave Theos pace to someone of more determined character, then you may well a winner, but Theo hides much too often for my liking..

After seeing a couple of games where he featured and also the one for england he's got it all for me... 1) He has the physical ability to offer the kind of game that our Giroud offers (back to the net: deflecting, relaying passes and 1 - 2 touches) but also 2) Pace, mobility and technical agility to offer so much more: dribbling past opponents (creating space), running / turning over defences either to lay down the killing pass to a better placed player or finishing a through ball from our over talented midfield and all that with speed and 3) Tactical awareness, willingness to defend players if asked (like the game Man U-Real Madrid in the CL) and could provide support not only in the air on corners!!

I believe with Walcott up front we look so much more dangerous, the added pace is frightening, Sanchez, Walcott, Chamberlain.

Rabiot looks a much better tackler and passer than Arteta or Flamini and he would suit JW's game better with more pace in the middle, take him.

However we've seen as fans that Ox performs much better playing centre of the part, allowing the midfield to have a lot more pace and control, as well as being even more dynamic in playing style and passing.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

But Bellerin's attacking qualities are really strong... For a RB he makes intelligent attacking decisions while passing, has no fear in taking defenders on and is blessed with as much rapid pace, if not more, than our other wingers.

Lacazette always looks dangerous when he gets the ball, but with the strength and pace of EPL defenders he doesn't get much time on the ball as our opponents have learned his style of play, but Wenger thinks that he still does enough for the team even though he can't seem to score any more.

Ferrari's qualifying pace may make the race look like a foregone conclusion, but the top four on the grid will actually start the race on the slower, more durable soft tyre, on which the pace this weekend has looked much closer.

Bellerin and Walker both possess incredible pace, but Bellerin has a much more impressive end product.

I would play chambers in dm position alongside ramsey with ozil having free role behind sanchez and ox on right that gives us plenty of pace and will allow ozil to get on the ball more and produce his magic passes he will be much more influential then stuck out on the wing espec as he is poor at tracking back so lets play to his strengths that will get the best out of him and in turn create more chances for forwards!

I think Higuain has more power that Giroud, but does he offer too much more than Giroud in terms of pace and hold up play?

Above all Gab is a much more complete defender, with pace, reading the game, heading, tackling, in fact the lot.

Certain players we have, especially Wilshere, Ramsey, and Giroud are poor fits for Ozil in my opinion (Giroud because he wants to be part of the build up too much and his lack of pace and skill causes Ozil to have less space than a quicker, more skillful CF would, I think the other two are obvious as to why).

The second half played much more to the Knicks» preferred pace until they went cold for a five - minute stretch in the fourth quarter.

He is a good player but it may be worth everyone knowing that he has little or no more pace than Mertesacker — seeing how much flak CC and PM receive for this failing it probably needs saying.

Most target men don't ve outrgeous pace... it more abt movement nd finishin wif so much of hard work for dem.

Pace has skyrocketed recently (meaning a lot more miles traveled per minute, leading to more total distance per minute and also higher average speed so less time resting those legs at slow speed) and also defenses now have to be everywhere (before defense wasn't as tiring as it's now because every player didn't need to cover as much ground as they do now).

Much like the No. 1 seed in their region, the Bearcats have ground their opponents down with defense and are more than comfortable playing plodding games in the 50s (or lower), but if those shots stop falling through unfamiliar rims, their slow pace can keep lesser teams within striking distance longer than Mick Cronin would prefer.

With Arsenal likely to be involved in a much more open game next weekend at Man City, where the pace and movement of Welbeck can really help us, has Wenger been saving this different animal from Giroud to be unleashed against City as we try to secure at least third and a guaranteed Champions League place?

To say that Hummels is a faster more mobile CB is quite frankly ridiculous as he and Mert are pretty much on the same page when it comes to pace of course Hummels is better but he would set us back a good 30 - 40m..