Sentences with phrase «much negative opinion»

I'm glad that you haven't gotten much negative opinion from people (I haven't either, aside from the one strange time I mentioned in this post), and I hope you continue to enjoy dressing in your own unique style no matter the looks people give you!

Not exact matches

Millennials are, in my honest opinion, a much - maligned group with lots of negative comments about them feeling entitled, being self - centered, lazy, etc., etc..

My guess is that whatever revelations are forthcoming from Mueller will fit a similar pattern — most people already have a negative view of Trump, so it's hard to move the needle too much more on public opinion, and the whole GOP has already wagered so heavily on the Trump experiment that they're not going to pull the plug regardless of what happened.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

Anyway, while I'm hesitant to convict or excuse him on these charges, I pretty much have a negative opinion of Bishop Long.

I've witnessed the negative impact of too much money given too easily and hold strong opinions about the dangers of unwise giving.

Couldn't agree more with you regards the negative postings however I think it's more a reflection on how divided our fans are, bad results and wenger out posts get thumbs up, a win of any kind and wenger out posts get thumbs down.me personally a wins a win and I actually thought we did ol but I'm very much in the wenger out brigade, the wins really do cloud the reality in my opinion which is wenger has built a squad so unbalanced its scary, miss managed it and not focused at all on the defensive side of the game, I do however feel that some though not all on both sides are guilty of stepping over the edge as regards personal abuse and it's all getting a bit ott

We are all entitled to our beliefs and opinions, and I sincerely respect your right to think anyway you desire — I'm just saying, for me anyway, I don't see much value in taking a positive and trying to turn it into a negative.

So, whereas I was of the opinion that heading into Monday's encounter no longer top of the league would have a negative effect on the team, it will instead empower them with so much reassurance and positivity that any sort of result would be enough to keep them on course for the title, but it does also mean they're there to be shot at so don't be at all surprised if United come sprinting out of the blocks this evening and put the Gunners to the sword very early on as don't forget, United had top - spot stolen away from them because of the recent bout of adverse weather.

Super PACs will make up the difference, but so far, they've been focused on ineffective negative ads — the president is incredibly well - known to most Americans and attacks won't do much to move opinions.

Timothy Kirkhope, leader of the Tory MEPs, has a similar du n no rating to Annabel Goldie (56 %) but of those willing to express an opinion it is much more negative.

However, the two negative opinions I have towards this game only regarding its game - play, are that it is probably just a little too distant from the previous titles, and that much of it is based off too much luck (which gets cheap at times) for my liking.

Concerning pretty much everything else, my opinion has tilted toward the negative.

Generally I agree with most of his reviews, maybe not the final opinion (he's almost always negative) but the flaws he points out are pretty much spot on.

I really hate to write such a negative review for a Final Fantasy title, but sadly I only offer my truthful opinion - so much potential but so little delivered.

Salle seems wise to leave most of his negative opinions unpublished; devoting so much time to something that you don't like is probably bad for the outlook of a painter.

In reality there is a huge diversity of opinion within the skeptic side, like: it's cooling; it's warming (but not as much as GISSTemp says); whatever the temperature is doing, it's caused by cosmic rays, or PDO, or sunspots, or recovery from the LIA...; CO2 is a greenhouse gas (but the feedbacks are negative); CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.....

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Vincentrj # 28 you are unclear re the division of your opinions / inferences between the 3 basic sub-topics (1) heat is entering the oceans due to radiative imbalance due to humans burning carbon fuels (2) the heat rate coupled with its estimated duration (based on its cause) will make it within a few decades become unprecedented during the last several thousand years and same for the surface temperature rise that will be required to stop it (3) the effects on flora & fauna will be highly negative even within this century and more so for centuries and millenia thereafter, in particular the human species which has softened much and expects much more since the days when a mammoth tusk through the groin was met with «well Og's had it, press on».

Now you can deny that oversellling catastrophe has a negative impact on markets, but it doesn't take much these days in my opinion.

Speaking of court Ross Wilson, my opinion is neither cynical nor based on negative experience, I just simply refuse to place any of my clients in such a precarious position — I like and respect them far too much to diminish the service I promised to provide and immediately deny any buyer expecting I'd be more than happy to give them a break in price because I'd get all the commission — after all, every single one always say that to me, to every Realtor I know who has been so approached.

I suppose your opinion is based upon much negative experience in what I must presume is a not terribly successful real estate career.