The GCMs appear to be wrong not only because they assume too much aerosol cooling, but also because, a) most of them arrive at a too - high temperature change between the 1880 - 1890 and 2000 - 2010 time frames, and b) because they generally predict too
much ocean heat uptake, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere.
Actually, they are quite wrong in lots of ways, not just surface temperature projections (way too
much ocean heat uptake, incorrect short term variability, incorrect rainfall patterns, even incorrect absolute temperatures, very poor region projections..
The skin layer temperature gradient determines how
much ocean heat is lost to space, as the lower the gradient, less heat is lost (or lost less rapidly).
How
much ocean heat can the great ice masses stand up to?
Then they used the climate models to simulate by how
much ocean heat content has risen since the 1970s.
That shows meltwater can play an important role in determining how
much ocean heat ultimately reaches Greenland's glaciers.»
Not exact matches
Too
much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere makes the planet
heat up; too
much dissolved in the
ocean makes the water more acidic.
Faster winds are affecting how
much heat and carbon dioxide the
oceans soak up, with immense consequences for us all, finds Anil Ananthaswamy
The findings outlined in the paper bolster the idea that
much of the warmth that would otherwise have
heated the Earth's surface has gone into the Pacific
Ocean.
But nearly twice as
much of the sunlight energy captured by phytoplankton in the
ocean is released as
heat than is used to make food, researchers report January 7 in Science.
Scientists can measure how
much energy greenhouse gases now add (roughly three watts per square meter), but what eludes precise definition is how
much other factors — the response of clouds to warming, the cooling role of aerosols, the
heat and gas absorbed by
oceans, human transformation of the landscape, even the natural variability of solar strength — diminish or strengthen that effect.
If
heat goes to the deep
ocean, that could greatly increase how
much heat the
oceans can absorb, Legg said.
Faster winds are affecting how
much heat and carbon dioxide the
oceans soak up, with immense consequences for us all
«It would be a great disservice to society if we did not learn as
much as possible from the fault zone
heated by this huge earthquake,» says Kiyoshi Suyehiro, president and chief executive of the management group of the Integrated
Ocean Drilling Program (IODP).
Adding vast amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere could
heat a planet to the point where it leaks so
much water that its
oceans eventually disappear
In the Southern
Ocean, the extra drawdown of
heat had gone unnoticed and is increasing on a
much longer timescale (multi-decadal) than the other two regions (decadal).
Climate models do not predict an even warming of the whole planet: changes in wind patterns and
ocean currents can change the way
heat is distributed, leading to some parts warming
much faster than average, while a few may cool, at least at first.
Pete Best writes: > It seems that the
oceans have absorbed
much heat > over the summer but have relased it into the > atmosphere which has caused the
ocean to freeze > quickly and oddly
One theory is that the Pacific
Ocean is absorbing
much of the «missing
heat» with help from strengthened trade winds (ClimateWire, Feb. 10).
This warm air layer gets its
heat reflected downwards during cloudy periods, especially during long night extensive cloudy periods, as a result, Arctic
ocean ice doesn't thicken so
much during darkness and leaves it up to summer sunlight (if there is some) to finish off what is left of it.
There is no way to know that for sure, but the revised sea - level numbers are consistent with the idea that the
oceans are absorbing
much of the lost
heat in the past decade.
It seems that the
oceans have absorbed
much heat over the summer but have relased it into the atmosphere which has caused the
ocean to freeze quickly and oddly even though the atmosphere is warmer than usual.
The planet has also been running abnormally warm, including record
heat in
much of the world's
oceans.
When we have a «blue
ocean» event, that will greatly increase warming all on it's own — adding as
much heating as all our emissions since the beginning of the industrial age!
For as
much as atmospheric temperatures are rising, the amount of energy being absorbed by the planet is even more striking when one looks into the deep
oceans and the change in the global
heat content (Figure 4).
Presently the
ocean absorbs approximately 25 % of industrial area CO2 emissions, and 93 % of the
heat;
much of this absorption occurs in deep waters below 200 m (Levin and Le Bris, 2015).
The
ocean has a
much higher
heat capacity than land and thus anomalies tend to vary less over monthly timescales.
So
much energy that this
heat baked the skies and boiled the
oceans.
The winds can affect rates of evaporation, which cool an
ocean in
much the same way as sweating can cool the skin, affecting the amount of
heat that moves between the sky and the
ocean.
Oceans trap
much of the
heat from greenhouse gas emissions, and 2014 was tied for the third warmest
ocean temperatures on record.
Because of it's
much higher thermal mass the
oceans will represent the largest single location where
heat accumulates.
The increase in
ocean heat content is
much larger than any other store of energy in the Earth's
heat balance over the two periods 1961 to 2003 and 1993 to 2003, and accounts for more than 90 % of the possible increase in
heat content of the Earth system during these periods.
Thus, during an El - Nino,
much of the
heat content of the Indo - Pacific warm pool moves from being too deep for surface measurements to detect, to being spread out on the surface of the
ocean, where surface measurements can detect it.
However, the large - scale nature of
heat content variability, the similarity of the Levitus et al. (2005a) and the Ishii et al. (2006) analyses and new results showing a decrease in the global
heat content in a period with
much better data coverage (Lyman et al., 2006), gives confidence that there is substantial inter-decadal variability in global
ocean heat content.
In turn, a warmer atmosphere
heated the
oceans making them
much less efficient storehouses of carbon dioxide and reinforcing global warming, possibly forestalling the onset of a new glacial age.
The upper
ocean, which scientists know captures
much of the excess energy trapped in the atmosphere, also reached its largest
heat content on record in 2017, Arndt said.
Scientists are especially interested in measuring the amount of hydrogen gas in the plume, which would tell them how
much energy and
heat are being generated by chemical reactions in hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the moon's
ocean.
[DC: There is, as you imply,
much more
heat in the
oceans than in the atmosphere.
At the same time, increasing depth and duration of drought, along with warmer temperatures enabling the spread of pine beetles has increased the flammability of this forest region — http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n9/full/nclimate1293.html http://www.vancouversun.com/fires+through+tinder+pine+beetle+killed+forests/10047293/story.html Can climate models give different TCR and ECS with different timing / extent of when or how
much boreal forest burns, and how the soot generated alters the date of an ice free Arctic
Ocean or the rate of Greenland ice melt and its influence on long term dynamics of the AMOC transport of
heat?
Much like a
heated kettle of water takes some time before it comes to the boil, it seems intuitive that the world's
oceans will also take some time to fully respond to global warming.
How 2015 will shape up is, of course, uncertain, but that
ocean heat will play a role, as water responds
much more slowly to changes in
heat than land.
The
ocean stores
much of the
heat absorbed by the excess greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, so it could be beginning of that
heat being unleashed back into the atmosphere.
Daniel masterfully evokes the sticky Miami
heat and refreshing
ocean breezes, but there is so
much more to these pages than fetching seaside images.
Daily housekeeping,
heated ocean - side pool & hot tub, concierge services &
much more.
These fogs and
oceans breezes moderate the summer
heat so
much that temperatures rise approximately one degree for every mile one travels east through the area.
This warm air layer gets its
heat reflected downwards during cloudy periods, especially during long night extensive cloudy periods, as a result, Arctic
ocean ice doesn't thicken so
much during darkness and leaves it up to summer sunlight (if there is some) to finish off what is left of it.
What is implicit, I think, in all this «wait for the models» talk is that there is no model for the
ocean heat to contact so
much ice in just eighty years.
That would be wonderful if at least Atlantic TC reduce or do not increase with GW, since GW is and will be doing so
much greater harm thru droughts, floods, disappearing glaciers, disease spread,
ocean anoxia (with HS outgassing likely to follow), species loss,
heat deaths,... am I leaving anything out?
Today's uncertainty comes from evaluating feedbacks and tipping points such as how
much longer the
Ocean will keep sucking up
heat and CO2 (OHC) or how fast non-linear developments will occur or for how long we can sustain civilisation based on conservative scenario assessments RCP8.5.
Pete Best writes: > It seems that the
oceans have absorbed
much heat > over the summer but have relased it into the > atmosphere which has caused the
ocean to freeze > quickly and oddly