Sentences with phrase «much opposition such»

Not exact matches

And it doesn't say much for the Opposition that they say such terrible things about this great province.»
Although they have used feminist language at times, their opposition to pornography stems much more from their nostalgia for a «purer» America, and they disagree with feminists on crucial issues such as sex education and day care.
This implies a high estimation of the body, such as had already occasioned much opposition at Corinth.
In any such case, to say that all those so opposed to Atheism are just motivated in their opposition, because of fears and / or insecurity, that is humorous to me, considering that people are hardly what I would consider sufficiently qualified to ascertain much as absolute.
How much do you think this is the fault of the team / Coaching staff for not being «ready to play» vs. the opposition being, perhaps, extra fired up to play (what is likely to be) their last game in such a storied arena?
They're are a rare breed of players who can break the opposition down from deep with one genius long pass that no else can see until it's too late, Pirlo, Xavi and Alonso are the only other guys that come to mind when talking of such game changing passes, Xhaka can become one too but he has to develop the same sort of vision, these players don't run much with the ball, the ball does the running for them and delivered to the right address.
Yes it would be hubris not to admit that there are plenty of things that are out of our control such as referee decision, hitting woodwork etc etc, but it would also be hubris not to acknowledge that the opposition also have as much quality, effort, and determination.
It is pointless to read too much into these early run - outs even if you might expect a Premier League outfit to have enough in their locker to stroll past such opposition.
It could not have been much harder for Tottenham than a clash with such practiced, savvy European opposition but Mauricio Pochettino's side can consider themselves well drilled.
Whenever I see such an uneven game as happened last night (and indeed the cup tie a few weeks ago) I wonder how much of it was due to the opposition playing really well and how much was down to our own incompetence.
The problem is when this devolves into the claims that 1) homebirth in the US is an acceptable alternative to hospital birth and 2) the main reason for poor outcomes in hospitals is opposition to natural birth (and the inevitable c - section)-- all the while completely ignoring much more real problems such as the huge disparity of outcomes by race; the high prevalence of pre-existing health conditions in the general population; and access to healthcare.
Much of the stated opposition against publicly financed elections stems from the cost of such a program, which opponents of reform have falsely exaggerated.
Founded by a merger of the Social Democratic Party and the Liberal Party, the party can be simplistically labelled as a mixture of economic liberalism and social liberalism, and it has become fashionable to insist that while the party could sit comfortably with such differences when in opposition, it is much trickier when in government, particularly as a minority party.
May I suggest that it would be much better to provide a whole week of Back - Bench business, so that all the matters that I am sure Government Members would like to debate, such as why the European Commission is demanding an increase of 7 % in its budget, and all the issues that Opposition Members would like to discuss, such as the double - dip recession, can be put not only to Ministers, but to the Prime Minister, who will be avoiding Prime Minister's questions for another two weeks?
But that's irrelevant to the spirit of the question, since (1) Democratic politicians in fossil fuel states pretty much do the same thing (See West Virginia's Democrat Manchin); and (2) Such behavior is really industry agnostic, and every politician of every party whose constituents are over-represented in a particular industry will of course behave the same way about competing disruptive industry; and (3) The main opposition is not on alternative energy per se, but on measures to tax / disrupt fossil fuel one.
It's logical but radical, says Robin Lovell - Badge of the U.K.'s National Institute for Medical Research in London, who argues the «yuck factor» accounts for much of the opposition to such research.
Although such offsets will never be enough to overcome all opposition, some voters will be open to evidence about how much harm was really done and whether efforts have been made to mitigate it.
The point is, the idea gathered so much steam that the NWO was able to pose as a legitimate opposition to WCW, and as such WCW / NWO Revenge was born IN NAME ONLY, because there's no real faction warfare in this game.
Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies, such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.
This kind of argument has taken several different forms such as, climate policies simply cost too much, will destroy jobs, harm the economy, or are not justified by cost - benefit analyses just to name a few cost - based arguments made frequently in opposition to climate change policies..
While it is pleasing to see that the South Australian Liberals under Steven Marshal have become much more pro-renewable power than they were, what does the retention of a man with Mr Ridgway's record of dishonesty in such important positions tell us about the state opposition?
, it may not be fair that we face such opposition, but it won't do much good complaining about it.
Current alternatives to the Keystone XL for transporting tar sands oil are on a much smaller scale, in much earlier stages of development, and in many cases face such significant opposition that they are unlikely to move ahead in the next five to 10 years if at all.»
We as in - house counsel especially understand the value and importance of such principles, so I do not expect that there will be as much opposition from this segment of the bar as we have seen from the private practice bar.
However more recent proposals such as the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base or «CCCTB» (which aims to harmonise the way in which EU companies determine their taxable profits and allocate then to different countries) have met with much less enthusiasm, in some cases outright opposition.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z