Not exact matches
And it doesn't say
much for the
Opposition that they say
such terrible things about this great province.»
Although they have used feminist language at times, their
opposition to pornography stems
much more from their nostalgia for a «purer» America, and they disagree with feminists on crucial issues
such as sex education and day care.
This implies a high estimation of the body,
such as had already occasioned
much opposition at Corinth.
In any
such case, to say that all those so opposed to Atheism are just motivated in their
opposition, because of fears and / or insecurity, that is humorous to me, considering that people are hardly what I would consider sufficiently qualified to ascertain
much as absolute.
How
much do you think this is the fault of the team / Coaching staff for not being «ready to play» vs. the
opposition being, perhaps, extra fired up to play (what is likely to be) their last game in
such a storied arena?
They're are a rare breed of players who can break the
opposition down from deep with one genius long pass that no else can see until it's too late, Pirlo, Xavi and Alonso are the only other guys that come to mind when talking of
such game changing passes, Xhaka can become one too but he has to develop the same sort of vision, these players don't run
much with the ball, the ball does the running for them and delivered to the right address.
Yes it would be hubris not to admit that there are plenty of things that are out of our control
such as referee decision, hitting woodwork etc etc, but it would also be hubris not to acknowledge that the
opposition also have as
much quality, effort, and determination.
It is pointless to read too
much into these early run - outs even if you might expect a Premier League outfit to have enough in their locker to stroll past
such opposition.
It could not have been
much harder for Tottenham than a clash with
such practiced, savvy European
opposition but Mauricio Pochettino's side can consider themselves well drilled.
Whenever I see
such an uneven game as happened last night (and indeed the cup tie a few weeks ago) I wonder how
much of it was due to the
opposition playing really well and how
much was down to our own incompetence.
The problem is when this devolves into the claims that 1) homebirth in the US is an acceptable alternative to hospital birth and 2) the main reason for poor outcomes in hospitals is
opposition to natural birth (and the inevitable c - section)-- all the while completely ignoring
much more real problems
such as the huge disparity of outcomes by race; the high prevalence of pre-existing health conditions in the general population; and access to healthcare.
Much of the stated
opposition against publicly financed elections stems from the cost of
such a program, which opponents of reform have falsely exaggerated.
Founded by a merger of the Social Democratic Party and the Liberal Party, the party can be simplistically labelled as a mixture of economic liberalism and social liberalism, and it has become fashionable to insist that while the party could sit comfortably with
such differences when in
opposition, it is
much trickier when in government, particularly as a minority party.
May I suggest that it would be
much better to provide a whole week of Back - Bench business, so that all the matters that I am sure Government Members would like to debate,
such as why the European Commission is demanding an increase of 7 % in its budget, and all the issues that
Opposition Members would like to discuss,
such as the double - dip recession, can be put not only to Ministers, but to the Prime Minister, who will be avoiding Prime Minister's questions for another two weeks?
But that's irrelevant to the spirit of the question, since (1) Democratic politicians in fossil fuel states pretty
much do the same thing (See West Virginia's Democrat Manchin); and (2)
Such behavior is really industry agnostic, and every politician of every party whose constituents are over-represented in a particular industry will of course behave the same way about competing disruptive industry; and (3) The main
opposition is not on alternative energy per se, but on measures to tax / disrupt fossil fuel one.
It's logical but radical, says Robin Lovell - Badge of the U.K.'s National Institute for Medical Research in London, who argues the «yuck factor» accounts for
much of the
opposition to
such research.
Although
such offsets will never be enough to overcome all
opposition, some voters will be open to evidence about how
much harm was really done and whether efforts have been made to mitigate it.
The point is, the idea gathered so
much steam that the NWO was able to pose as a legitimate
opposition to WCW, and as
such WCW / NWO Revenge was born IN NAME ONLY, because there's no real faction warfare in this game.
Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver
much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies,
such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all
opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.
This kind of argument has taken several different forms
such as, climate policies simply cost too
much, will destroy jobs, harm the economy, or are not justified by cost - benefit analyses just to name a few cost - based arguments made frequently in
opposition to climate change policies..
While it is pleasing to see that the South Australian Liberals under Steven Marshal have become
much more pro-renewable power than they were, what does the retention of a man with Mr Ridgway's record of dishonesty in
such important positions tell us about the state
opposition?
, it may not be fair that we face
such opposition, but it won't do
much good complaining about it.
Current alternatives to the Keystone XL for transporting tar sands oil are on a
much smaller scale, in
much earlier stages of development, and in many cases face
such significant
opposition that they are unlikely to move ahead in the next five to 10 years if at all.»
We as in - house counsel especially understand the value and importance of
such principles, so I do not expect that there will be as
much opposition from this segment of the bar as we have seen from the private practice bar.
However more recent proposals
such as the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base or «CCCTB» (which aims to harmonise the way in which EU companies determine their taxable profits and allocate then to different countries) have met with
much less enthusiasm, in some cases outright
opposition.