The study in partnership with Summit Ministries was aimed at discovering how
much other beliefs influence Christians in America.
Not exact matches
This recommendation comes from finance professor Anat Admati, who says: «Economists tend to think that
beliefs and behavior are guided by incentives and rational processing of information, but I know that there is more to it than this simple model, and that
other disciplines have
much to say.
Your post is typical Christian propaganda, filled with far too
much pride toward yourself and far too
much conceit toward the religions and
beliefs of
others.
Thanks man although think this way we will not have
much to talk about since each rejects
beliefs of the
other...!
The details of Catholic
beliefs are really not of
much interest to most non-Catholics, so they can hardly be expected to do in depth investigations on their own with so many
other more pressing news items.
Interesting Pope for sure — but BTW: None of his core
beliefs differ AT ALL from the two previous Popes, it's just that his communication style is more focused on everyone's common ground — the
other Popes had the same
beliefs, it just that they were more outspoken on the controversial issues — so the media did not warm to them as
much.
Theistic satanism usually takes either of two faces: Luceferianism which worships Lucifer (or the bringer of light) which is actually a very nice set of
beliefs (google it)
much in - line with
other popular religions..
So my question to you even before it gets to that point is the same as I have given to
others, first why do you hate God so
much and second what are you afraid of by switching your faith and it is by faith that you believe there is no God to a
belief that God does exist he sent his Son Jesus to the world to redeem you from your evil and hateful ways?
You don't see tacky anti-atheist posters around
much do you, many
other «
BELIEF groups» just go about their day and give you space.
I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many
beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn
others, I think if maybe more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as
much problems as we do.
Lack of a
belief one way or the
other is actually Agnosticism, which is
much more rational.
That's why there is so
much prejudice aimed at gays, pro-choicers, stem cell researchers, family planning or followers of
other belief systems.
He believes that whoever is in a battle with him is his comrade, and he doesn't care
much about their
other beliefs or agendas.
except your wrong... this many gods objection was brought up in Pascal's time... and he explicitly rejected it because he maintained that christianity is unlike all those
other religions and if they examined it in detail they would realize as
much... youre twisting pascal's own
beliefs... he very
much was postulating that either the christian god existed or it didn't
Something believers refuse to address when you point it out to them is the fact that
much of the reasoning they use to support their religious
beliefs can be applied equally well to almost any
other set of religious
beliefs, including some that are inconsistent with their
beliefs.
The religion who claims the very foundation of their
belief is love so
much so that God sent his son to sacrafice his life so that the rapists, muderers, child molesters, theives and
other sinners can be saved!
You are not
much better than any
other fundamentalist, still trying to shove your own views down the throats of
others and condemning their
beliefs.
For all of you who work with us, you hopefully see that we don't force our
beliefs on
others, don't prohibit
others from drinking coffee or alcohol at work or work dinners / parties, it's pretty
much like working with anyone else.
It just seems that people like Hawking ignore religion completely when a HUGE part of science is questioning all
beliefs including your own which I don't think human beings do as
much as they should, or respect
other people's opinions.
DON: In the old days before the internet, you could just willy - nilly say the Bible said pretty
much anything you wanted and people just didn't have the knowledge, the references or the ability to research the
other tribes out there who were speaking against those ideas to affect our
beliefs.
I agree that man has come of age if this is taken to mean that he should no longer put
much value in a presentation of
belief as
other - worldly or metaphysical, in the sense of the atemporal, ahistorical.
Massively fewer wars and oppressive regimes and torture, and they are
much much better at living in harmony with
other beliefs.
I don't need to share in
other people's religion or spiritual
beliefs to respect them and see how in so many cases it brings them so
much strength and peace in times of despair.
But I believe he's been taught by his pastor father the old school teachings on tithing and
other beliefs so
much that he hasn't seen the truth in Scripture.
I mention, only because my... paradigm (I'm not
much on
beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine» of my own definition, that equates to something like «awe of life, love, and knowing that there is
much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist of it) that I don't see as a «personal
other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed as the Divine acting.
«If you leave your wild
beliefs out of your argument, you'll have a
much better chance of making a point that is logical to anyone
other than you» -------- So why didn't you give that advice to Doc when he insinuated that God is anthropocentric?
There is nothing in the theory of evolution, nor in astronomy, or in geology, nor in paleontology, or any
other branch of the sciences which contradicts Christianity, or any
other type of theism (except Mormonism — we know scientifically that the Indian peoples of the Americas are not descended from the Jews — which is a key point of
belief for them,
much more central than there having been a literal Garden of Eden is for classical Christianity or Judaism).
When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious
belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so
much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and
others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
Latest was explosions in India marked as «Islamic Jihadists» and another in Pakistan although I was surprised that it was not marked as «Hindu Jihadists»... That would have had both Great Countries confront each
other serving the purpose of
other competing nations over the Rich Indian Peninsular... Believe me no nation fall back unless people of her own are traitors to it's nations principals and
beliefs for the reason of Hate, Envy, Revenge, or Greeds towards material wealth even if by selling their Dignity and integrity or their family, tribe, community, the nation and the country it wouldn't mean
much to them... and those can be found among every level of the one Society...
well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past
beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a
belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too
much is asked to put
others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?
They try to spread their
beliefs in
much the same way as any
other religion.
Atheism is as
much a faith as any
other philosophical
belief.
Please don't worry too
much about
other people's
belief, the consti.tution also grants everyone of us the freedom to practice whatever it is and (even) the lack thereof.
Short of when someone uses their
belief to affect the lives, rights, liberty, and property of
others, why do we all seem to care so
much about what
others believe or why?
Or didI I?Was I just more convicted in my views so I just went forward as a believer and thrust my
beliefs on
others without thinking about it as
much as I do now.
It is important to remember that the parents in Tennessee and in Alabama were not asking that their own religious
beliefs be taught in the schools,
much less seeking to «control religious impulses and reshape spiritual sensibilities» for the children of
other parents.
Nor, however, have I seen
much in any of the foregoing writings (
other than Kitchen's) that suggests a strong
belief in the power of the Creator; or in the necessity for coming to Him through confessing Jesus as Lord and believing God raised Jesus from the dead (Romans 10:9).
If God heals alcoholism and AA's are clear in that
belief, they can have an enormous impact on the attitudes of government, medicine, religion, and
other agencies in determining just how
much such entities will welcome the powerful «God - business» solution.
I do not see that happening as
much with
other beliefs.
Of course, as I have stated so many times before, I am under no delusion that fishon, and now you, or anyone who seems to take great pleasure in pointing out the «error» in the
beliefs of
others, cares at all how
much impact their attitude plays in the debate.
The authoritarianism, moralism, and legalism of
much traditional religion diminishes spiritual awareness by encouraging people to project their own spiritual powers onto deity (thus impoverishing their inner lives), introject self - punishing
beliefs that diminish self -
other esteem and distort relationships, and retroflex vital assertive and sexual energies, thus blunting their aliveness.
I learn so
much from your blog, David, precisely because I have never been spiritually abused (or abused in any
other way), and I have never had to deconstruct my
beliefs.
Much like Murdoch herself, they wish to retain the liberal tradition's
belief in the worth of individual moral action, yet find it difficult to do so in an age in which the enlightened individual is threatened on one side by cynical despair and on the
other by the totalitarian excesses of political hope.
Other beliefs and values are much more unevenly distributed — by class, education, ethnicity, and other fac
Other beliefs and values are
much more unevenly distributed — by class, education, ethnicity, and
other fac
other factors.
Just do what you think is right in life and don't worry so
much about
other people's
beliefs.
People complain about Christians evangelizing, when atheists love to try to push their
beliefs on
others just as
much.
«my
beliefs have been the same for years» some
other morons might say, ok so i pose a question then to all the believers whos faith has gotten them thru so
much (laughs) HOW OLD IS THE EARTH?
You both «believe» and insist on imposing your
beliefs on
others, and that's why you all cause so
much harm and misery to
others.
For every «personal testimony» in favor of your religion, there is one for every
other religion, made with just as
much sincerity and
belief.
Second of all, I'm an American and I've ALWAYS been tolerant of
other religions and
beliefs, no matter how
much they can drive me nuts.