Sentences with phrase «much out of the question»

I actually meant to make this last week when I got back from Bonnaroo, but of course what with hanging up wet tarps and feeling a lil sad about missing my new pals, actually cooking anything was pretty much out of the question.
And if not the Open, then it's hard to see Campolindo dropping much farther than the Division I bracket (it's all done by competitive equity now, not by enrollment), and Division III, where the Cougars were last year, is pretty much out of the question.
I found the Hello GreenLite part to be really appealing as well, as office visits were pretty much out of the question!
The right way to do it is this... If the routine calls for 4 sets of 6 reps, then you should barely be able to complete the sixth rep. Form should still stay good, but it should be a challenge to complete that 6th rep, and a 7th rep would be pretty much out of the question to complete in good form.
My feet hurt so badly in, like, everything, that I think wedges or heels are pretty much out of the question until after the baby arrives.
Christmas week was unseasonably warm, so wearing a big heavy sweater was pretty much out of the question.
Sure, there are not as many obvious monetization options here (with paying memberships pretty much out of the question), but SkaDate dating software still offers a few ways to make money.
A million or so photos are uploaded on the site daily, so human monitoring is pretty much out of the question, and artificial intelligence isn't up to the task, either (not yet, anyway).
If he had a Kindle he could read some of his books but graphic novels are pretty much out of the question until the color e-ink technology becomes a consumer reality, hopefully like Mr. Schwartz said at the end of this year.
The subprime market has almost vanished, and conventional loans are pretty much out of the question unless you have excellent credit and can meet lenders» increasingly stringent qualification requirements.
If you don't have the room to house these items, breeding is pretty much out of the question.
Airbnb is pretty much out of the question when it comes to affordability.
You'll be learning to surf on a longer board so duck diving is pretty much out of the question.
Getting close to one is pretty much out of question.
train, I'd like to see the ability to use the Switch screen and a TV screen for a single game — albeit one that would certainly have to be graphically scaled back — like the Wii U and that system's controller, but that's pretty much out of the question, since it'd require substantial new hardware.
The Australian states of New South Wales and Queensland ban most advertising relating to personal injury legal services, so virtual law practice is pretty much out of the question in this field.
It probably comes as no surprise that being on dialysis means getting life insurance is pretty much out of the question.
One handed mode too is pretty much out of the question even though there is a one handed mode.
While you'll be able to play less - demanding titles like Dirt 3, games like Witcher 3, Rise of the Tomb Raider or Grand Theft Auto V are pretty much out of the question.
That said, there's a lot less software you can install on a Mac, and games are pretty much out of the question.
A drastic redesign was pretty much out of the question right off the bat, considering how different the Galaxy S8 and S8 + look from their predecessors.
Using them for voice calls, or even to talk to a digital assistant, was pretty much out of the question.

Not exact matches

It could be months before Twitter decides to sell — Dorsey still hopes to carry out a vision of tapping into live broadcasts events as a way to reignite user growth — but the question remains: How much would an outside company be willing to pay for Twitter?
As a number of observers have pointed out (including Fortune), the question isn't so much whether Facebook filters out certain kinds of news — something that newspapers and other media entities do every day without much scrutiny.
And critics are also quick to point out that the promised benefits to Main Street of Trump - style tax cuts — faster job growth, higher wages and a boost to the middle class — are very much in question.
To find out the researchers rounded up a group of 500 Swiss and German study subjects and presented them with a series of questions about how much they worked, how exhausted they felt, and how much guilt they experienced after indulging in some couch potato time.
When a flood of orders suddenly rolls in, figure out the answers to these questions: How much merchandise is needed and when?
To find out why, the researchers flipped the question, asking the developers not «how long will it take you to complete X,» but instead «if I give you X amount of time, how much will you get done?»
When it comes to retirement planning, the key question is how much the client can safely spend out of his or her portfolio during the golden years.
My question... is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some more or something different altogether... there is simply so much time ahead of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065 is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front of him, he'll only be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers
 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).
So I would trot out the question of why, if Lonnie was a fat guy per se, he wouldn't have gotten as much grief.
Well, if you make a habit of announcing information like that on Facebook, it won't take much for a hacker to figure out the answer to your security questions — especially if your Facebook account has no privacy controls.
In a New York Times blog, Ross Douthat notes that Pew created two nonbeliever categories instead of one: the much publicized atheist / agnostic category (which got 21 out of 32 religious knowledge questions right) and a much larger category of respondents who described their religion as «nothing in particular» (which got only 15 right — a bit below the national average of 16 correct answers).
If someone wanted to find out how what percentage of people in the U.S. believed that the outcome of a football game was divinely determined in the sense implied, the questions would have to have much better phrasing.
has its place in theology within the problem of the law — so much so, indeed, that on the basis of the concept religion the correct distinction of law and Gospel is quite out of the question, and thus the domination of the concept religion in theology can only lead to falsely turning the Gospel into law.34
This broad, liberal creed supported by a set of idealistic categories that never questioned seriously the progressive revelation of the mind of God in the existing personal and social relationships of man has been too much at home in this prosperous world to need to call out a rebellious Danish religious prophet who challenged the very categories of its thought.
My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER
The Kenyan President stood up to the American President after his chastisement, and pointed out that Kenyans do not agree with the enlightened superiority of the superpower in question, and are concerned with much more basic aspects of civil society, and affirmed their right to govern their own nation.
Asking hard questions or pointed questions is much more effective when they arise out of a relationship of trust and affection.
I'll try not to fan out too much as I ask my question: I'm reading a book by pastor Jonathan Martin in which he discusses the fact that, in our current culture, fame and notoriety are treated as necessities, while obscurity is considered the kiss of death.
-- There is so much to figure out and you're content thinking ancient humans answered all of the questions?
There is so much to figure out and you're content thinking ancient humans answered all of the questions?
For me, the point of asking that question is not to expunge Platonism or even to straighten out all the tangled knots that make so much of theology unthinkable without its Greek trappings.
(1) the healing community is supportive of individuals in it; (2) it must cope with the question of how much it will impose conformity and whether such imposition is inevitable or necessarily repressive; (3) it has self - awareness; (4) it can adapt to change and growth; (5) it is small enough to function effectively; (6) in some cases it may be institutionalized to reach out in love and service to those outside the group.
I remember being in some church meetings way back when the pastors told the congregation, suspiciously in the absence of the people in questions, why certain people left, only to find out that things were actually much different.
Nor, in his view, do pastors fare much better in the parish, where they find themselves awash in books detailing the success stories of particular ministers and congregations and in practical how - to - do - it manuals on everything from evangelism to stewardship generated out of programmatic approaches to questions of growth, size and organizational effectiveness.
Much of Paul's writing is devoted to helping them figure it out by answering difficult questions like, «Do Gentiles now have to assimilate to Jewish culture?»
But actually requiring a dialogue, question and answer, interactive discussion about a text of Scripture, which then leads to brainstorming about how everybody can go out and put it into practice in tangible ways, and then actually going out and doing it, requires too much for most people.
For much of the eighties and nineties, with worship wars breaking out in Protestant churches across America, the answer to that question was far from clear.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z