The concern isn't so
much over a sentence like I... [more]
Not exact matches
In the wake of the controversy
over Love Wins, someone recently suggested to me that perhaps hell is not eternal after all and that those sent there might one day complete their
sentences,
much as a prisoner serves for a certain period and is then released.
On the front it simply said THANKS, and the inside was filled with run on
sentences about how
much we've appreciated their unconditional love and massive support
over the past half decade.
Too
much of the journey is glossed
over in stark, unadorned
sentences which at times robs the alien terrain of its sublime beauty.
Here's where journalists win out
over bloggers every time: Journalists have it stamped on their brains that the first
sentence of their story has to lay out pretty
much everything.
Asher writes: «DeFeo's metaphysical but concrete art functions in
much the same way: the act of mirroring, or flipping images
over and around, of changing black to white, of cutting through the surface of something, of changing liquid to solid, of waking and sleeping, of returning a different person to the place where you began your journey: such transformations are the very sensibilities of DeFeo's art, not one of mere
sentences but one of propositions, abstract, as direct as they are elusive, subtle, alive to indispensable distinctions.»
-- must be spinning anti-sensewise, to have jammed so
much nonsense into their final
sentence: ``... society elected not to follow one of the possible solutions mentioned in the NEWSWEEK article: to pour soot
over the Arctic ice cap, to help it melt.»
For example, a person who is just a few grams
over the legal limit will probably be diverted out of the legal system, whereas a person selling it at street level in large quantities without paying the taxes or having a licence to do so will receive a
much harsher
sentence.
She summarized the area in 8 brief paragraphs (paras. 20 - 28) introduced by a
sentence which I wonder if the Court now regrets including: «
Much judicial and academic ink has been spilled
over the proper test for causation in cases of negligence.