Sentences with phrase «much point changing»

Unless the new leader is prepared to hold an immediate General Election there isn't much point changing the leader before next year's local and European elections.

Not exact matches

If TV shows hadn't given him so much coverage, or had challenged his erroneous statements more directly, or pointed out his obvious flaws as a president, would that have changed anything?

You can start off small by making just a few changes to an integral part of your business — one you probably don't give much thought to anyway — your Point of Sale (POS) system.

But much of that has changed in the era of always - on social media, to the point where some wonder whether the traditional press corps has outlived its usefulness.

Capital raise after capital raise obviously signals an intense cash burn rate, but if Tesla is going to change the world and push electric cars to a point where they constitute more than 1 % of global auto sales, chilling out on the spending and letting the balance sheet take a breather doesn't make much sense.

Along with these kinds of changes, and the growing popularity of autonomous driving, the consistent design of services and experiences from within the car and beyond will become much more important to car manufacturers — to a point where it will drive brand identity, said Nils Uellendahl, the Shanghai - based design director of BMW Group's (bmwyy) global creative consultancy Designworks.

The point, emphasized Information reporter Amir Efrati, was to zero in on Series A and seed funding, where he said he didn't expect to see much of a change.

Also, some commentators will be tempted to draw attention to what they might describe as «large 1/2 percentage point changes» when the forecasts are revised, even though any such revisions may reflect much smaller adjustments if it is the case that the forecasts have merely crossed rounding barriers.

And without dimensionalizing that too much, it's a substantial change in terms of the balance of items on the menu are $ 15 or below, which we've determined to be sort of a threshold point for affordability for high - quality seafood in casual dining.

Yeah, actually we're moving very quickly across our entire spectrum of products with innovation and new materials, new ideas, changing as much as possible, changing point of sale.

«The idea that we can just return capital to companies and that will trickle down and grow the economy, that may have been true at some point — I'm skeptical — but so much has changed in the way that companies allocate capital.»

It's reaching a point where we don't have much else to say and are just waiting for a change of scenery.

«Not yet,» he says, «but with so much systemic and technological change chipping away at the incumbents» models, from the exodus of young customers to ad blocking, it's not inconceivable that a tipping point can be reached that pushes centralised platforms into extinction.»

In terms, I think of inflation and bond markets, it took six, seven, eight, maybe 10 years of high inflation in the 1970s before you had Paul Volcker brought in to say «enough is enough,» and then again whether it's led by American monetary policy but similar moves in Europe, obviously in the UK, a significant tightening of monetary policy because people got fed up with inflation and I don't think that we are kind of yet at the point where real wages have been suppressed so much by that irritation that inflation is always running ahead, life is becoming more expensive, so we need the central bank radically to change their policy.

I hate to break it to you but we are pretty much at the point of bankruptcy and it would be nice to see some values in the White House for a change.

But it does show how much Biblical interpretation has changed, because the scriptural point that made them pacifist was «thou shalt not kill», which they felt applied to war.

I intend to confine myself to the three points that preachers traditionally allow themselves (more aptly, perhaps, the three wishes that fairy - tale characters are always granted just before they are turned back into frogs) I wish, first of all, that one might avoid the statistical traps that lie in the path if one relies too much on changing church membership figures — in this case the figures that are supposed to show drastic decline and weakening in oldline Protestantism since the 1960s.

From the point of view of ecologism, becoming much more efficient in our use of energy and other resources is but one of many changes that are needed.

However, as Peter went on to point out, the meaning of the Psalm really doesn't change too much.

I have at present a view point that either needs to be confirmed or changed: THAT BAPTISM MEANS TO BE IMMERSED IN LORD JESUS CHRIST, NOT SO MUCH IN WATER.

Now, as a Presbyterian, I have no personal stake in the doctrinal position or discipline of the Roman Church, beyond the obvious point that, if she were to change on same - sex unions, it would make the fight for religious liberty much more difficult for all of us.

This change in focal - point can not be over-emphasized, for it is the key to much which happened later in the faith of Israel, and which is again happening in the new world to which Christendom has given birth.

It's going to get much, much worse over the next couple years and at that point some universities may start changing policies.

«Much of the change in opinion has occurred over the past few years — support has risen 13 points since 2010,» Pew Research Center says.

Would the points value change if the brown sugar was omitted completely??? if I used only half as much of the brown sugar??

I saw some comments about using oatmeal but no mention of how much or if it changes the points.

I'm not sure how much it will change the points or not, but my husband and I have found that the Fat Free Kraft Shredded Cheddar or Mozzarella taste just as good as the reduced fat and I believe only have 1 PP per person...

And when I say «I don't want him to change his game to much» Im saying that I don't want John changing his game to the point where he doesn't feel like he is being the player he wants to be.

Boise State opened as 30 - point favorites at most books, and not much has changed.

I don't think changing OC at this point will do much for the offense either, but would appease the fan base.

And while the Prof has pointed out in an Arsenal.com report a few key reasons for what happened, he has also played it down and suggested that it could actually help the team in the long term as it can serve as a lesson and should not end up changing too much as Arsenal looked set to come second in the group anyway.

The changes didn't make much of a difference, as Ole Miss missed 10 of its first 11 shots and scored just three points in the first 5 1/2 minutes of the game.

Bro... Your point proves Vardy will be a good signing if we manage to sign him... we won't have to change our playing style much to accomodate him!

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

On a calmer but still frustrated level there was talk of the need for «change» with much finger pointing at Arsene as manager being the object in need of change.

We are at a point where something has to change and that is almost certainly the manager, much as it pains me to say it, wenger has done such a good job for the club, building a new stadium and keeping us in the top four.

it wont change though as Wenger wont spend, the board wont force him and the fans wont boycott the games so as much as it really pains me to admit it NY Gunner has a point when he says why worry about what you cant change?.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Gazidis pointed out something last year «catalyst for changes» and he was blaming our poor infranstructre we have at Arsenal where a head coach / manager had so much power to do almost everything sorrounded with incompetence / yes man like Dick Law reporting to him and going out to close a deal or push it to a finishing line with fixed price set up by Wenger!

It's tough to place much significance on just one season's worth of data, but it's logical to speculate that the new extra point rule contributed to this change.

This might not mean too much to you and there is definitely a case for saying that stats do not win titles, but I think these are quite telling as Arsenal have often been accused of being wasteful with our chances so if that has changed it is a huge plus point.

Oh here we go again no one must even dare to point out that AW is fallible, Le Coq has not changed so much that he is an entirely different player the Boss DID MISS IT AND IT WAS only DOWN TO THE INJURY CRISIS THAT WE FOUND HE COULD DO THE JOB, the boss missed it!!!! ITS THAT SIMPLE.

As much as any fan that gets upset with Wenger I share the same compliment as in I'm not afraid of change and at this pace I rather it sooner than later... I respect Wenger to the max for what he has done for our club but I have to be honest, at this point I'm starting to imagine life after... Think about it we still haven't figured out top teams and we're lucky to leave the Etihad that day with all 3 points if City hadn't just got off the plane.

There's no more point hoping for anything else but complete failure which will cause the change our owners fear so much...

He even pointed out Aarons change in tactics, some on here might not have noticed Aaron having a great individual display but at least someone has noticed him doing something much more important — having a great team ethics display.

It didn't take long for bettors to jump all over them, changing some totals by as much as 11 (yes, eleven) points.

Do nt change the team too much either for champions league game this week (1 or 2) we need the points badly if we are to qualify out of the group, 2losses with 2games against bayern back to back will be horrible to deal with.

This formation change and experimenting with ozil outwide has cost us points which will hurt us at the end of the season, why did nt wenger just stick with the formation and setup that brought us so much success last season.

Until then no point in judging because nothing much has actually changed.

Not much has really changed with the Gunners; they finished with four points more than they did in last year's second - place run, but Tottenham, Chelsea, Liverpool, and City all rose up far enough to push them out of the Champions League for the first time in 20 seasons.