Sentences with phrase «much potential upside»

Not exact matches

Lothar Mentel, chief investment officer at Tatton Investment Management, told CNBC on Monday he does not see much upside potential for the euro in the shorter term.

I'm someone who always calculates the potential upsides and downsides, and I think many people take unnecessary risks: They either invest too much or too little because they don't do proper analysis.

«I do think that EUR / USD has further upside potential and that much of the drive this year will come from expectations regarding a less accommodative ECB.

The projected income from this side hustle is $ 12,000 to $ 24,000 this year, with a huge upside potential depending on how much I want to do with it over the next few years.

Opening new trades at the current levels involves taking on too much risk with minimal upside potential (negative reward - risk ratio).

«We don't see much upside potential in the market near - term, but we don't see substantial downside risk either.

... The stock market essentially has a lot of upside potential without much downside risk....

Mordy believes that Chinese equities still have much upside potential, particularly in sectors that will benefit from consumer - led growth and financial reforms.

The $ 104 billion figure was viewed as far too high for a company with a still - unproven revenue model and questionable upside potential for growth that would rely far too much on new market share in India and China as opposed to a domestic market that was already saturated (and even losing memberships by the millions).

The only upside to that trade is that the Dolphins look like a team that might do much worse next year so that has the potential of being a top 5 pick, but I'd be pretty disappointed with that return.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

That upside revenue potential alone will pretty much offset projected out - year budget gaps.

The upside is that if you do reach a literary audience, the potential is much wider.

With short - term bond fund rates between 0.5 % and 2 %, and intermediate - term bond fund rates between 1.5 % and 3.3 %, there is plenty of downside risk due to the potential for higher future interest rates (bond prices fall when interest rates rise), and not much upside potential due to the current low rates.

Generally investors use covered calls to earn extra income from investments they think might not have much upside potential.

So, you get the same potential upside on a much smaller investment with lower downside.

By writing covered calls, then, you're giving up much of a stock's upside potential in exchange for income today.

The disadvantage is that there may not be much time premium and you give up all of your upside potential.

Faber chimes in regarding the current bond bubble «There isn't much upside potential in treasuries unless it is for the short term.»

I think we're still at 80 - 20 (still heavy for most people), but as you pointed out, we're still set for the upside growth potential without much loss risk.

As the performance results show, a weak Style Score robs the stock of much of its upside potential over the next 30 days.

Most investors are served poorly without adequate attention to both the downside risk and upside potential over a much longer timeframe.

However, carefully chosen stocks picks will provide just as much upside potential as warrants, with less of the downside risk.

I remain convinced that over the long term, an investment in TAVF will combine both greater upside potential, and much less downside risk, than would an investment in an Index Fund such as the Vanguard 500 Index Fund.

Therefore, the real purpose of continually updating share prices with each post / file is to basically allow me to rank all shares together (pretty much apples to apples) by current Upside Potential — this will offer an expanding real - time menu of Irish stocks to consider as we progress.

If issues were resolved, I would then have been ready to double / triple my position, probably at a significantly higher price — but so what, underlying value is much higher, so plenty of upside potential still available, and the burning issues would no longer be an overhang / financial threat.

These days, I'd happily accept much more limited upside potential, in return for greater financial stability and / or lower correlation (s).]

How much upside potential is now on offer?

Does anyone believe that the upside potential of market growth will amount to much when paying 3.5 % in fees every year?

2) Participate in investment opportunities that have minimal downside risk but high upside potential: «Heads, I win; Tails, I don't lose much.»

Frankly, choosing brand - new stocks is often a real challenge — I usually have strong conviction, a medium - long term holding period, and see significant upside potential in my current holdings, so adding to them often makes just as much / more sense.

They can also offer better diversification & lower correlation in your portfolio — the possible opportunity & upside you see may be much less dependent on the economy & the market (but far more dependent on that potential transformation & value being realized).

My line above is v relevant: «Significant upside investment potential will almost inevitably become totally irrelevant (or lost) if there's too much leverage involved».

Of course, smaller stocks are a little harder to deal in and % spread's a little wider — I've never seen this as a real problem, as I demand a much higher potential upside for smaller / more specialized stocks / funds, so this tends to compensate.

Total Produce $ TOT: ID, last reported as a 6.5 % portfolio holding as of end - June, now sold down to zero... Total Produce $ TOT: ID — business / shr price running out of steam, upside potential's nw much reduced & other new / existing positions beckon...

I probably could've gone much lower on the strike and still not had my shares called away, but I wanted to leave some more upside potential.

Few analysts cover these small stocks and this lack of coverage leaves much room for upside potential when good stocks are largely unnoticed.

My experience so far has been that rebalancing removes too much of the upside potential while offering very little downside protection.

4 This average excludes certain holdings that always trade at NAV, and a holding which I estimate has a 1,000 % + potential upside... If I include these, the average would be a much higher 140 %.

[I've never been able to get excited about the whole IFA business myself — asset managers offer far higher margins & much greater upside potential!].

Personally, I believe a bond investment here faces pretty much the same risks as equity, so I prefer the greater potential upside inherent in the shares.

The cash flows from current royalties don't seem to provide much upside potential.

Therefore, if DOC can't show any upside potential now (fair value at $ 13.41), there is not much appeal to invest in DOC.

I would suggest that the yield is not sustainable and you do have all of the downside risk of owning the equity without as much upside potential.

I prefer flexible points to these because the everyday earning isn't that much worse and you maintain the potential for large upside when transferring then redeeming bank points effectively.

We think that this dynamic, if sustained, could limit the upside potential related to new OLED - based devices that likely sell for a premium, which could keep average selling prices from moving much higher.»

The question is, however, and especially in the wake of a pretty much across - the - board decline in the cryptocurrency space over the last six weeks or so, just how far can this one go and what sort of timeframes are we looking at when we say that there is real upside potential associated with Stellar and XLM at current rates?

However, should the software platform progress as much as bitcoin has over the last seven years, ether prices may hold significant upside potential.

THE UPSIDE + Be your own boss + Work from home, university... anywhere really + Limitless earning potential (seriously, you can earn so much money) + Bonuses for hitting targets + Prove yourself and get a stand out reference from us to use on your CV + Learn new entrepreneurial skills and many more + Earn over 50 sign - ups become Student Brand Manager + No interview - you can start in the next 5 minutes!

That being said the rest of my comment would look much like Mr. Johnsons except I might add that it depends on the upside potential.