Sentences with phrase «much proof god»

Theres too much proof God exists and his spirit lives in us once we except him into our lives.

Not exact matches

The fact that you, a «non-believer», have spent this much time and energy defaming the Holy Son of God, just adds to the mountain of proof that Jesus Christ is a force that must be reckoned with by every human being.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

I have seen much more proof of GOD than than I have of scietific «fact» Gods word hasn't changed in 6000 years.

Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

With faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so much greater than mortal men which He created who have limited knowledge.

I believe god is love, I think we have little ability to understand much beyond that at this point and those who would define and codify god are arrogant fools doing harm in this world, I believe that the absence of love in anything is proof that it doesn't come from god, fire and brimstone does not come from god, unconditional love and acceptance does.

Loving one another (family specifically) unconditionally and teaching love by example is far more of a noble focus than spending much of our time obsessing over and trying to please a god whom there is zero proof of existence.

There is as much proof (more so in some cases) that Big Foot, the Loch Ness Monster and backside probing aliens exist than there is of gods.

If God were real, given that there are billions of believers and over a billion Christians, if God cared about us so much it seems to me there would be more people who had the «proof» you claim to have.

To us, there's just as much proof for unicorns as there is god.

I'm not even actually denying that Jesus was real, but there is absolutely no proof that he was the son of god or divine in any manner, so sorry, he holds as much credence as Harry does.

He talks about there being no God or Heaven so much because he requires demonstrable proof when the Truth is staring him in the face.

the proof of Gods presence in us is not limited to the material or biological evolutionary development only, but most important scientific proof is the effect of His will in historical development of the world.A computer program now used and tested a powerful machine by inputing all recorded events in history during the last hundreds years and found out that it has a purpose and not random.Meaning that an intelligent being could have influence it.It is now presumed by the religious observers that it could be His will.The process now is under improvement, because the computers is not powerl enough the deluge of information and data since the beginning of history, some analyst believes that in them near future if the Quantum computers which is much powerful than the present coventional will be used, then dramatic results and confirmation will be at hand.

There is no tested evidence of these natural explanations, much less proof, but the existence of multiple natural possibilities negates the Big Bang and Inflation as proof of God (that doesn't mean it proves No God, it means that it can't prove God did it since there are other alternatives).

There is, of course, as much credible proof that Paul actually saw his god, as there is that Joseph Smith had a «special visit» — that is — none.

Three of Aquinas» proofs involve infinite regress and there is no reason to think that god provides a terminator, much less the Christian god or any other god.

topher: where is this much promised proof that those ware «god's laws» rather than the translated, edited hearsay of iron age sheep boinkers?

So, as much as it would be lovely - looking proof of God's existence, that sudden perfecting of believers, alas, that's just not how it works.

God bless you richly Jeremy, thank you so much for blessing me... now the proof will be shown as I do share my «coals»

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

I suspect that science doesn't prove as much as you think, and I can assure you that the things it does prove are not proof that God does not exist.

And there is just as much proof for those other gods as there if for your god.

The best part of all this discourse is that it serves as undeniable proof that God does exist and He created you all; if you truly believed that there is no need to worship God because He is a made up piece of fiction, would you actually spend this much time arguing over some ridiculous fallacy?

«Atheists» have no proof (love that word in this topic) against God and still believe in nothing with the same amount of dedication and blindness of the «christians», getting their fuzzy feeling from chiming in about how much they «know» against God.

You'll never get the «first hand proof» you want, until you believe God first, and if you do get it, none of your atheist peers will believe you... much like you now.

There is no proof to prove there is no existence of a God, as much there is Proof that God does not eproof to prove there is no existence of a God, as much there is Proof that God does not eProof that God does not exist.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

The general idea is that there is as much proof for a deity they call the «Flying Spaghetti Monster» as there is for a loving, Triune God (or any other deity), so they «worship» an imaginary, spaghetti - like thing and conclude their prayers with «Ramen» instead of «Amen,» which is admittedly clever.

Believing in God is much more pleasant, and we humans are predisposed to experience emotions that feel like proof when we think of things like a higher cause, morality, justice, etc..

Proof of God is much simpler than that.

What there is, is Jesus doing miracles then, and some people didn't believe him, and they become obsessed with trying to disprove him (much like you are), and becoming violent when no proof is given that he is the Son of God.

Sadly, there is as much proof of the existence of Zeus as there is proof of the existence of your christian god.

My argument is that while science does tell us much about the world around us, IT (science - our most favored epistemological standard) obviously only deals with the physical and can not disprove the spiritual, and that there are other ways of knowing truth that do prove (support is the word I prefer, since no «proof» is satisfactory to al epistemological standards) the existence of God.

And they will know we are Christians by our Love...... the HATE and FEAR I read and hear so much of by people who think they have it RIGHT, the right God, the right skin color, the right country, the right religion, even ther right definitions, the right science, the right proof, all the while telling all others they have it WRONG is the scariest stuff on this planet Earth.

I'll say it again, then... They will know we are Christians by our Love...... the HATE and FEAR I read and hear so much of by people who think they have it RIGHT, the right God, the right skin color, the right country, the right religion, even ther right definitions, the right science, the right proof, all the while telling all others they have it WRONG is the scariest stuff on this planet Earth.

I mean, their belief system is generally based on faith that there is no god, even though there is no proof for an absolute materialist universe, which is as much a statement of faith as a religious persons» Note I am agnostic and find both extremes goofy.

But I have as much proof that I am god as the religious nuts have proof that their god exists — zero

And they has just as much «proof» of the existence of their gods as we do of ours.

A creationist once held up a banana as proof of God but this is a fruit very much made by humans.