O but no there wouldnt be, most of you hide from society, not for fear that you will be judged, but just that simple fact, that you got about as
much proof nothing exist beyond this place, as I do that there is!
Not exact matches
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so
much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said
nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of
proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
«Atheists» have no
proof (love that word in this topic) against God and still believe in
nothing with the same amount of dedication and blindness of the «christians», getting their fuzzy feeling from chiming in about how
much they «know» against God.
This seems to many to he too
much to ask, but
nothing less will do justice to the challenge of the burden of the
proof.
Banana and chocolate is a fool
proof combination so you know that pretty
much nothing can go wrong there.
Still, The Joneses is generally a watchable piece of work that, if
nothing else, stands as further
proof that Duchovny deserves to be a
much,
much bigger star than he currently is.
Democrats have a
much better chance of hanging on to the Senate, but
nothing close to a filibuster -
proof majority is in the making.
Friendly and efficient staff,
nothing too
much trouble, our room overlooked the beautiful gardens and the sound
proofing in the room was excellent Will visit again
The actual cynicism isn't about stating the obvious greed of others, but it's the attitude that «
nothing will ever change», that bothers me most here, since history is full of
proof, that indeed so
much has changed for the better!
One reason for being confident about there being
much more uncertaintly than the 97 % concensus suggests is that there is
nothing like a concensus, let alone
proof, of what caused (and causes) the extreme natural variations in climate throughout geological time.This variation is well documented and almost certainly has a variety of underlying causes which are likely to be very different from C02 or other MM emissions even if higher greenhouse gases levels have often been present.