Sentences with phrase «much protection does»

The next question that usually follows is how much protection does the public need?

How much protection do you have?

«How Much Protection Do Employers Owe to the Public At Large Main More Well - Funded Plaintiffs» Actions, Coming Soon to A Company Near You»

How much protection do you have?

Not exact matches

Fashion companies don't typically have much coveted IP protection like technology companies.

So much of our computer networks and critical infrastructure are in the private sector, which means that government can not do this alone,» Obama said during his speech at the White House Summit on Cybersecurity and Consumer Protection Summit.

And while the rather thin outsole doesn't offer much protection if you step on a sharp rock or a protruding branch, the shoes will keep your feet safe from pokes and scratches as you jog through brambles, and they breathe well enough to keep your foot cool even in hot, humid weather.

Not only do credit cards have fraud protections in place in the event of theft, but they also offer some of the best currency exchange rates around — much better than you'd get changing bills at a bank or exchange kiosk.

My increasing concern is that we won't see much from the incoming administration that doesn't involve intimidation, misuse of power, self - dealing, and attempts to use discretionary edict - as a substitute for equal protection and legislative process.

If they don't have many guests, animals or venture out much, they probably don't need as much liability protection.

They're a drag on performance and don't offer as much protection as people think.»

As cryptocurrency crowdfunding is new it does not yet enjoy the same protection which means any involvement carries as much risk as opportunity for an investor.

It is hard to believe, for example, that Canada could not in the end find common ground with the US on some extension of patent protection for pharmaceuticals, since it was able to do so in the just - completed negotiations with the EU, or that an extension of the term of copyright protection from 50 to 70 years from the agreed baseline would have much if any real practical impact on Canada although it would be seen as a gain by the US given the heavy copyright portfolios of US entertainment companies, allowing them an additional period of time to exploit their copyrighted content.

Prices will be found at which the remaining active funds will be willing to transact — those prices will simply be much lower, to ensure adequate protection for the funds, given that they haven't done the work necessary to be comfortable with the purchases, or alternatively, given that they need to pay for that work, and that the money has to come from somewhere.

It has to do with «a dynamic concept» (Jeromias, 1974: 121) which indicates a divine sovereignty that does not consist in handing down impartial verdicts but in the protection that the king ensures is given to the weak and the poor, to widows and orphans, and not so much with a particular place or abstract idea.

Without name protection, there isn't much I can do to change how things are going.

ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?

For although it is foundational, it doesn't provide much protection.

Though far from perfection, and with each manifesting much to be done before liberty and justice for all are fully served, such societies afford protections for basic rights more broadly and efficaciously than was ever accomplished in any traditional, pre-modern, pre-capitalist, or pre-republican society.

I don't believe that this is the way it should be, especially since we worship a God who has much to say about the love and protection of children.

Arsenal do not possess much in the way of effective defensive or holding midfielders, with the number of creative talents far outweighing those who can get «stuck - in» and offer protection.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Doesn't offer much protection, offers nothing in attack, has no discipline, and has already made some big mistakes.

«It has to be enough but not so much that they don't tune you out, which I would have done when I was 19 and someone was showing 20 clips of pick - and - roll protection.»

Since then our midfield pivot axis is very fragile and didn't give much protection needed for the back four.

Shame he didn't have much protection in front of him but he did as well as could be expected.

He was unusually hesitant at times on the ball and didn't offer Nacho Monreal much protection down the left wing.

We identified before the game that the area in behind Eden Hazard, who doesn't offer as much protection to Ashley Cole as Juan Mata does Ivanovic on the right, should be exposed.

The manager — assessing the opposition and how the Hammers could have got at them added: «With three in their midfield, it means you can get into wide areas and maybe cause them some problems because there's maybe not quite so much protection, but we didn't have a chance to get into those areas as much as we'd have liked.

You're not wrong at all, i think Can in a two would be certainly enough protection, i do think he is tasked with doing a bit too much right now to concentrate on defending the space.

Couldn't have done much for the goals and afforded precious little protection by his woeful defenders.

Feghouli was more involved than usual although he played very narrow (possibly under instruction) and did not offer temporary full - back, Kouyate, much protection.

Clearly, same - sex couples understand the importance of marriage's legal benefits and financial protections much more than heteros do.

Considering falls are largely to blame for the injuries found in the study, those rails and sides really don't offer your babies much protection.

She needs cloth diaper changes more frequently and isn't quite as heavy a wetter as her brother, so she doesn't need quite as much leak protection.

They don't need our defense and protection, they are doing just fine, thank you very much.

The ride is not as smooth as some of its counterparts, and the canopy doesn't provide as much protection as some parents would like.

You can go higher, but experts believe that anything over 30 doesn't typically provide much additional protection.

This is really important because unlike traditional car seats, big kid booster seats do not have as much side impact protection so you need to be sure that the one you buy will do its best to keep your child safe.

The age of two is now considered the minimum, but a law for minimum protection doesn't make much sense.

Just know that it does not provide much padding for protection if you were to drop it, but for short trips it would serve you well.

Safety and security and also protection features do without asserting yet some fathers and also mothers need much more storage room in there infant strollers where as some mother and fathers rather have a lighter weight baby stroller that is really simple to store.

Not only is it difficult to find a formula that a food - allergic baby will tolerate well, but the loss of immune protection and enhanced healing from mother's milk do much disservice to the already distressed infant.

And workplace accommodations to support continued breastfeeding simply don't exist in much of the world, let alone protections for poor women working in the informal sector, such as domestic work or street vending.

Security as well as safety along with safety and security along with protection features do without urging yet some mothers as well as fathers need much more storage room therein infant child infant strollers where as some mommy as well as papas rather have a lighter weight baby stroller that is in fact standard to store.

Protection in addition to safety and security along with safety as well as defense qualities do without specifying yet some daddies in addition to mothers call for also a good deal much more storage area in there child infant strollers where as some mommies in addition to papas rather have a lighter weight kid baby stroller that is exceptionally uncomplicated to store.

There is a real irony in Diaz hosting Abrazo Boricuaparticularly with his expressed desire to «protect» his community.I guess that desire doesn't extend to the women of his community (excuse the pun) because the Grand Poobah of the parade this year is a wife beater — who SERVED TIME IN PRISON for the crime.His enablers at the Puerto Rican Day Riot committee attribute his violence to a youthful error — ignoring the fact that he was in his FORTIES at the time.Check out which politicians march and which do not and ask yourself if they'd ignore a violent anti — semite or racist or homophobe being so honored.Once more women in that parade are relegated to the position of tarted up and half naked — even the pre teens — but not worthy of respect.So much for Diaz» «protection».

Countries typically don't want more refugees than they absolutely have to accept (and, in spite of what you might have heard, that very much include Germany) but there is nothing preventing them from providing protection to anybody who meets the definition if they want to.

Meanwhile, people who could do a much better job but don't have the same connections and protection offered by their status aren't even allowed a look in.

Ryan did, however, promise members of the far - right House Freedom Caucus that he would hold a vote on a much more conservative immigration bill that would provide fewer protections for DACA recipients than the bipartisan Senate bill does.