Sentences with phrase «much publicity when»

i really wish that the press would not give these crime committing idiots so much publicity when they should be silently locked away into oblivion.

Not exact matches

Even in the relatively rare cases when this number is reported, it is typically reported later than GDP and receives much less publicity and commentary.

Of course, Koinex received much publicity over the weekend when they announced eight cryptocurrency pairs based on Ripple's XRP digital token.

Much of the negative publicity was quickly wiped away, however, when the first pictures of an adorable Suri were published in Vanity Fair's October issue, with an accompanying story on the family's still - unwedded bliss.

that too much of my own goodwill, when scratched, reveals suspicious motives: trying to «save» others or myself, positive publicity, growing my ministry etc..

Much more recently Hawking has reiterated this version of events, when in June 2006 he gave a lecture in Hong Kong which gained wide publicity.

Odegaard joined Madrid amid much publicity in January 2015 in a deal worth a potential $ 8 million when he was 16 years old.

The publicity for the movie makes a big deal of the fact that the singing wasn't post-recorded, but that isn't much of an advantage when most of it sounds horrible.

Shot on the zoo set, the footage is classic, grainy 16 mm, suffering from soft focus and hissy sound, but it's fun to watch Schrader play the Articulate Director when he's pretty much disinterested with the whole publicity angle, and the reporter's attempts to focus on Kinski (who was briefly involved with the director during shooting).

Hyundai grabbed lots of publicity by including Apple's popular tablet computer when it launched the Equus last year, playing it up in TV commercials — so much so that you could be forgiven for thinking the Hyundai Equus was nothing more than a fancy iPad app, let alone a real luxury automobile.

Hyundai «s nice little publicity stunt is now over: future Equus buyers will not be getting a free Apple iPad with their luxury car (much like we didn't when we reviewed it recently).

However, when I finished this book, I made a reasoned decision to try promoting it as much as I could via the internet, since, as I said, I couldn't afford to hire a publicity company for thousands of dollars per month, etc..

That's why, despite the fact that traditional book reviewers should probably have changed their submission requirements long ago, when the technological changes in book publishing shortened the book production schedule so much, it's still impossible for book publicists (and for authors who are conducting book publicity campaigns) to bypass the rules and garner traditional book reviews without having at least three months» lead time.

I think it will depend on how much publicity and buzz is generated from the big guns when they release their slates.

I gather from this post that this happened not one, but three times, which must be incredibly frustrating, and Hechinger says that this last time, when the book was solicited for an October 2010 release, he didn't do much publicity for it because he didn't want to talk up a book and then have it not come out — again.

I don't feel like coughing up $ 100 for «publicity» when I could put that money to better things like hosting and tools and computer parts, especially now that the bigger dogs are buying their Steam lottery tickets and grabbing that much more attention from the smaller guys.

[ANDY REVKIN responds: I daresay I've brought Dr. Hansen's research and conclusions as much or more publicity over the course of his career than any other science writer, starting with a 6,000 - word cover story on global warming in Discover Magazine in 1988 that opened with his Senate testimony and continuing through the period when political appointees at NASA tried to stop him from speaking out.

Updates below Last year, after opponents of hydraulic fracturing made much of an unpublished paper by a doctoral candidate in economics who reported finding health impacts in infants from nearby gas drilling operations, I wrote a piece titled «When Publicity Precedes Peer Review in the Fight Over Gas Impacts.»

Choice 1: How much money do we want to spend today on reducing carbon dioxide emission without having a reasonable idea of: a) how much climate will change under business as usual, b) what the impacts of those changes will be, c) the cost of those impacts, d) how much it will cost to significantly change the future, e) whether that cost will exceed the benefits of reducing climate change, f) whether we can trust the scientists charged with developing answers to these questions, who have abandoned the ethic of telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but, with all the doubts, caveats, ifs, ands and buts; and who instead seek lots of publicity by telling scary stories, making simplified dramatic statements and making little mention of their doubts, g) whether other countries will negate our efforts, h) the meaning of the word hubris, when we think we are wise enough to predict what society will need a half - century or more in the future?

When it received so much publicity he was probably very pleased, as it increases your chances of getting the next funding grant.