Sentences with phrase «much questioning came»

«Even in schools where no incidents took place too much questioning came from pupils,» she said.

Not exact matches

The question really comes down to how much attention should be given to new technologies when a candidate is running for a political office as important as POTUS.

One hopes that whatever it comes up with, Ottawa's much - anticipated clarification will provide more answers than questions.

I had about an hour to move as much as I could and I called my friend Doug; I knew he would come, no questions asked.

Microsoft was first and the company pretty much answered the questions about motion gaming, with a whole bunch of Kinect and Kinect - enabled games coming this year.

«Today, the answers to those questions are different - you do not get much which does not come close to justifying the step function increase in the cost to upgrade, and as the below chart show the cost to upgrade changed dramatically with the introduction of the iPhone X.

The great advice you are going to get from your mentor can come from your questions, but much of what you learn from them will be through absorption of their habits and mannerisms.

If prospects find answers to their common questions via blog posts written by people at your company, they're much more likely to come into the sales process trusting what you have to say because you've helped them in the past — even before they were interested in purchasing anything from you.

When it comes to retirement planning, the key question is how much the client can safely spend out of his or her portfolio during the golden years.

Last week, much - hyped uBeam came under fire after a former engineer questioned whether uBeam can ever ship the technology it has promised.

These questions come not so much from open - minded inquiry, but rather from a biased agenda.

Zuckerberg quickly articulated that he would be in favor of regulation, using much the same language he would return to later in his response to Senator Sullivan, but the implication of Graham's line of questioning was more profound than that: perhaps the real problem is the monopolistic nature of the company, because the normal checks that come from competition were missing.

He cites a large imprudent acquisition as being one of the only things that could derail his love for Berkshire today, and says that the question of who will succeed Buffett is an important one, he thinks both Buffett and the company have done much to prepare for that eventuality, and he sees the company as being a great one for many years to come.

Answering these questions will give you a more realistic sense of what you can afford to buy, and how much to offer when the right house comes along.

If you're a new investor, the question of whether you should buy index funds or ETFs ultimately comes down to your risk tolerance and how much money you have to invest.

When it comes to answering the question of who should be interviewed, the «who» matters very much.

 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).

you can ask questions all you want, test it as much as you like but only you can decide to believe.I have studied hell, read my books about, went to different websites and searched the bible, for a Christian to fear hell is not possible.For one Christ himself said he is the only way to the father.So I think the fear of hell comes from guilt or their power freaks.

At the end, having agonized through much of the poem over the questions posed by his gnostic favorites, he comes back much more strongly to a defense of the categories of Christian worship.

When it comes to the big questions, nobody can prove much of anything... neither science nor religion.

HEY NICK WAKE UP, I WAS IN THE MORMON CHURCH FOR 36 YEARS, and when i went to the BISHOP AND STAKE PRESIDENT, He Was his words» I do nt process to know much about the curse of Cain, nor do i need to know», OR TRY THIS ONE ON FOR SIZE, THis Nick comes from my former Bishop,» i wont allow now or in the future QUESTIONS TO LEAD ME ASTRAY» IAM NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP, YOU DO NT QUESTION MORMON LEADERS, FOLLOW AND KEEP YOUR EYEE SHUT

It's because I kept asking questions that I left Christianity and, many years later, came back to a much more human version of it.

Having come to the conclusion several years ago (after a lot of abuse from the first church I was part of) that doubt is far from being a threat to our faith — if we enter it with questions for God — I realised it is actually the yeast in our faith, and in the discourse with God we grow (much like your cartoon).

It's not my faith that I question as much as all the different dogmas that come with it.

Yet this touches on what makes Ezekiel a prophet to begin with; he forces us to question whether our discomfort over God's judgment comes not so much from fear of taking sides, or of being found on the wrong side, but from feeling affronted.

I think I decided to pursue it as a full book because I came to realize that the somewhat specific culture of «hipster Christianity» was actually indicative of much broader tensions and paradoxes in contemporary Christianity dealing with identity, image, and the question of cool.

Atheism is becoming much more mainstream and popular because we are in the era of progressive scientific knowledge in the past decades that is unmatched, and with education comes questions of why and how.

But it is an open question how much solid improvement has come in consequence.

The form in which the answers to these questions have come is not so much that of systematic treatises as of concretizations of alternative philosophical models: the open classroom, gay marriages, tire commune, house churches.

But before we come to that discussion, it will be useful for us to turn our attention to the question of «resurrection» — first, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, about which so much of the earliest Christian writing found in the New Testament, and so much of the Christian experience of discipleship, turns; and second, to consider the point of the continuing Christian affirmation that those who have responded to the event of Christ are themselves made «sharers in Christ's resurrection».

Bishop Steven believes the Church needs to come up with answers: «In the 19th century and for much of the 20th century, science asked hard questions of faith.

And there was no question in most people's minds that GWB wasn't «born again», but it wasn't much help when it came to economic matters.

The fundamental question that Bonhoeffer poses before us is «If religion is no more than a «garment of Christianity» which must now be cast aside because it has lost its meaning in a «world come of age», if the real problem facing Christianity today is not so much that of religionlessness, but precisely that of religion, then what does all this mean for the church?»

Not all Christians read the Bible literally but take much of it to be collections of folktales, poetry, and history that sometimes illustrate how difficult it can be to navigate through life and grapple with the questions of where we come from, where we're going, and how we are to live in the meantime.

I think there is, in as much as about 70 percent of Americans disapprove of convenience abortions even in the first trimester of pregnancy, and in as much as people like me, when they come to consider the question seriously, have sometimes changed their minds.

Thus while they have, as have the Religious Right, usefully called into question the harmful influence of the naturalists, when it comes to the well - being of science they are probably as much a hindrance as a help.

In this connection, I have been particularly struck by Gustavo Gutiérrez's observation that, whereas much contemporary theology seeks to respond to the challenge of the «nonbeliever» who questions our «religious world» as Christians, in a continent like Latin America the primary challenge comes to us rather from the «nonperson» who questions us about our «economic, social, political and cultural world.»

Actually my comprehension is fine actually its better than yours because you dismissed the question and actually didn't answer it, and when he came back you didn't answer at all so care to now??? I would also like to know why it isn't his civil right just as much as the gays??

Her extreme and backwards views will come out, question is when and how much money has she waisted running once it comes out.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

Come on Laura, nobody really cared, and most people think as I d that his reply was just skirting the question because he didn't want to give a direct answer to the question in fear of criticism from the Mormon Church of which he is a member, because without much doubt he probably would be participating in the celebration and drinking a beer also.

You said: «Until «science» can answer questions like WHERE did the universe come from and how matter created itself, I won't give much authority to the «proving of» evolution and science and its claims.»

And there is a call here away from communities of triviality which imagine too much is at stake too soon and too often in every question that comes up.

Until «science» can answer questions like WHERE did the universe come from and how matter created itself, I won't give much authority to the «proving of» evolution and science and its claims.

If in the process of researching our questions, we come to a new understanding of the truth, so much the better.

Perhaps our own age is the first in which much effort has been expended in seeking to avoid any such confrontation, so that it is now generally assumed that while death will inevitably come to each one, the question it poses can be put off to that distant tomorrow.

One way or another it is true with all of us that the ultimate test of character comes when trouble comes, when some battering shock befalls us and the question presented to our goodness is not so much whether we will do a right deed as whether we can stand up with integrity of soul under what life does to us.

«It is no longer a question of if, but how much when it comes to being transparent,» says Ronak Sheth, chief customer officer at Label Insight.

For that, I accredit my friendly and encouraging audiences - thank you so much for coming out to support me, listen with great interest, and ask thoughtful questions.

Peter Laufer: Yes, except in the environment that we have and the type capitalism we practice the regulatory agency in question which is the USDA, the United States Department of Agriculture; the National Organic Program, the NOP, is serving business at least as much as it's servicing the rest of us and maybe more and it's the position of the USDA that if companies like Trader Joe's or others decide that the origin of their products is a proprietary business tool, then they are successfully able to hide behind that claim and not tell you where something you're going to buy and eat came from.