Sentences with phrase «much radiation exposure»

That's just because there wasn't as much radiation exposure as people thought.

Not exact matches

Too much exposure over a short time can damage the body enough to limit its ability to fix itself, fight infection, and perform other functions, leading to a dangerous condition called acute radiation sickness or syndrome.

The probe's visits are also fast and infrequent — about every 53.5 days — to prevent it from getting too much exposure to the planet's electronics - damaging radiation.

Limiting exposure to microwaves, dental and medical equipment, and even absorbing too much UV radiation from the sun help keep baby and mom healthy.

The study notes that indoor tanning products can produce 10 to 15 times as much UV radiation as the midday sun, and supports the recommendation of medical groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, to minimize ultraviolet exposure, including from indoor tanning.

(I was ready to order Demron underwear to protect the most vital of my vitals, but DeMeo explained to me that testicular cells stop actively dividing much earlier in life than breast cells, leaving the former much less likely to become cancerous due to radiation exposure.

In order to contaminate a large area with enough radioactive material to pose a major health hazard, the dirty bomb would have to be packed with so much cobalt 60 (on the order of a few ounces in this case) that the terrorists would die of radiation poisoning within minutes of exposure to their own weapon.

The radiation used for cancer therapies is a much more targeted version of what exists in outer space, and exposure to that radiation presents a major health risk, and thus a serious challenge for NASA, SpaceX, and other organizations trying to explore the solar system.

A study in rats suggests high cellphone radiation exposure is linked to tumours, but the experiment can't tell us much about how we normally use phones

As future missions look to travel back to the moon or even to Mars, new research from the University of New Hampshire's Space Science Center cautions that the exposure to radiation is much higher than previously thought and could have serious implications on both astronauts and satellite technology.

This linear no - threshold (LNT) dose - response relationship has been used to extrapolate the risks of low doses of radiation from epidemiological studies that were done following exposure to much higher doses of radiation (e.g. survivors of the atomic bombings).

They showed that basal cells were much more efficient at repairing DNA damage, allowing them to survive and reproduce following exposure to chemicals or radiation that damaged the DNA.

Add to that the question of how much human exposure can be expected from the radiation detected at some Marcellus drilling sites.

Also worth keeping in mind is that the normal disease rate is much higher: four in 10 people will eventually develop cancer without exposure to extra radiation, Hoffman notes.

The review did not calculate how much radioactivity people may be exposed to, even though such calculations are routinely completed by scientists studying radiation exposure.

«The levels and duration of exposure to radiofrequency radiation were much greater than what people experience with even the highest level of cell phone use, and exposed the rodents» whole bodies,» said NPT in a statement.

When these foods are consumed, a person receives much of this dose internally, often a more severe pathway to receive radiation than by external exposure.

When radiation treatments are given for cancer, special care is taken to ensure that as much normal tissue as possible is spared from radiation exposure.

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

They are also much quicker and greatly decrease the amount of radiation exposure.

There is much to explore about these natural magnetic fields but the purpose here is to warn animal owners that consistent exposure to manmade electromagnetic radiation (ref # 2) can cause immune system damage, heart irregularities, and fertility or behavioral problems in both humans and animals.

The picture from an echocardiogram is much more detailed information about the heart than a radiograph and involves no radiation exposure.

digital dental radiographs which require much less radiation exposure than conventional film

The report said that lifestyle diseases, such as alcoholism, among affected residents posed a much greater threat than radiation exposure....

Note that the radiation exposure from living within 50 miles of a coal fired plant is much, much less than exposure from living in a brick or stone house.

And while the verdict on Fukushima is still not definitive, the latest report on the accident predicts no direct deaths and a much lower exposure to radiation for the surrounding population than that purported to lead to fatal cancers.

There is no consistent evidence of human health effects from exposure to extremely low - frequency electromagnetic radiation at much higher levels than is present near wind farms.