Sentences with phrase «much real evidence»

I'm not sure how one would prove the case that IEA projections have shaped investment decisions, or show exactly how, but I haven't seen much real evidence offered one way or the other.

People have a tendency to jump on band wagons without much real evidence to support them.

Not exact matches

Plus, research and anecdotal evidence suggests that spending too much time gazing at perfectly curated profiles on Facebook, profiles that often eliminate all the warts and stresses of a person's real life, can knock your self - esteem.

«We'd love to proclaim these numbers as definitive evidence of a real downshift in the trend in claims, but it's even riskier than usual to put too much weight on single observations at this time of year,» says Shepherdson.

The 33 - year - old billionaire instead insists that the real mistakes that were made by Cambridge Analytica happened years ago and that Facebook's 2014 policy change served as evidence that the social network had already taken steps to ensure that app developers didn't harvest and exploit too much user data.

But several media outlets, including Vox and Sosa's organization, the Center for Investigative Journalism (CPI), have collected ample evidence that the real number is much higher — and that the government continues to underreport it.

You claim to have evidence that shows your god is real somehow, but haven't provided even so much as a link.

You can, in the absence of even so much as a shred of evidence, simply not believe there are any gods, like most people will not believe Loch Ness houses a monster, or that the Tooth Fairy is real.

Each one of us must eventually face the real issue, which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?

This is why scientists can not «prove» the evolutionary development of the eye (and we know that the real chance of finding fossil evidence is much lower than 50 %).

It is common for people to say that there is much about the resurrection of Jesus that they do not profess to understand, but that the evidence makes it clear that something of a unique and miraculous order occurred, which had the effect of leaving the tomb of Jesus empty, and of convincing the disciples that Jesus was alive in some real sense.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

I believe that each one of us must eventually face the real issue, which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?

There's too much evidence on his existence to deny him as a real person.

I am so fed up AKB's like yourself Budd, that criticize real fans because they dare to question the almighty Wenger, even though there is so much factual evidence to support the claims that Wenger is not good enough any more.

It's a step in the right direction, but still need much more evidence of real change before having any confidence that we can be title challengers next season, even with the 3 -4-3.

Think about how much of a pariah any one of us would become if we spoke out, especially with no real evidence.

Unfortunately, according to historian Howard Markel, much of the parenting advice of the time lacked any real scientific evidence of results, first because of the ethical problems associated with experimental trials on babies, and second, that if

Doubt has been cast on key evidence in the case, meaning there's a real possibility Mitchell might be exonerated - or, at least, have much of the stigma of the event removed.

As much as he'd like to help out his half of the species, Sue says, «we can not yet conclude that this phenomenon is real, but the current evidence is suggestive that it may be.»

With so much physical evidence of a real condition, why were ulcers routinely classified as psychosomatic?

In fact, much of the evidence suggests that the only real benefits to ice baths are psychological.

In part because it plays a role in reducing weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and so on (for more details on how this distorts the results, including evidence from other studies on how these statistical tricks hide real health benefits from much higher amounts of running, see my earlier blog entry).

As for metabolic ward studies, their strength lies elsewhere since due to restrictions in n and length they can not provide conclusive evidence on whether a given issue is of that much relevance in the real world and / or whether lifestyle interventions etc. etc. can address it or not.

All in all, there is much recent evidence pointing to some very real benefits for making dietary changes in order to improve mental health outcomes.

I literally wore the elbows out of my beloved real leather jacket from ASOS (and I of course have evidence how much I wore it) so I knew it was time to find another.

Much to the chagrin of Keller, though, the police are forced to release Jones after 48 hours because there is no real evidence to continue to hold him, plus they do not think he has the wits to kidnap two little girls, keep them quiet AND outwit the cops.

It would be comforting to see writer / director Dan Gilroy's debut film as satire, but there is too much real - world evidence of the sensationalism and tabloidization of the news to observe the film in that light.

Although the evidence is mounting that expanding instructional time will result in real learning gains, evidence on the costs of extending the school year is much scarcer and involves a good deal of conjecture.

«It's much better in the long run, even if it's uncomfortable for politicians in the short run, that these things are informed by real evidence of what's going on.»

But there is limited evidence in the real world of schools improving much as they compete for students, according to education experts.

It is much easier to focus attention away from these real issues by making Education responsible for everything and suggesting educational inequality exists because teachers and schools don't know what they're doing for lack of «evidence».

There is strong evidence that interactive learning experiences have as much positive impact on performance as real - life experiences — and in some cases, possibly even more.

I suppose the question should be asked: How much evidence do we need that the Government's real agenda is to funnel the public education budget into private hands at all costs, before those who keep urging us to moderation start to use their platform to expose that agenda, rather than assist in their laughable campaign of pretending any of this daylight robbery is motivated by an interest in «standards».

How much of her circus days were real or fictionalized I can not say as I found no evidence researching this area.

Today, however, we are confronted with growing evidence that the real world is so far away from offering a meaningfully positive risk - free rate that much of this finance theory is of doubtful merit.

It also ignores the very real evidence that spending time doing Trap - Neuter - Return and fostering truly social cats will help a much greater number of cats.

The Raccoon Suit is much in evidence, and most worlds have a haunted house (involving shenanigans with real and fake doors) and a mid-level tower that culminates in a mini-boss-battle.

«Thanks to further largess from the arts community, Pratt Institute's Flameproof student exhibition will be coming to Bushwick Open Studios... «I think the idea of participation in the art community is much more in evidence in this context, it feels very real, participatory,» [Pratt professor Greg Drasler] said.»

«I think the idea of participation in the art community is much more in evidence in this context, it feels very real, participatory,» he said.

Thanks for visiting Dot Earth today and I hope you'll sift back for posts on enduring issues and concepts like the «population cluster bombs» that are the real peril from high fertility rates; evidence that humanity's amazing, sometimes - exasperating diversity is perhaps our species» most adaptive trait; and the idea that when numerical goals seem out of reach, there's much that can be accomplished by fostering traits in society that guarantee some progress.

Pt 7, «Cancerous Greenpeace / Desmogblog / Gelbspan Stuff»: What's detailed in this post is how Dave Rado's Ofcom complaint is first and foremost pushing absolutely nothing more than guilt - by - association «evidence» to indict skeptic climate scientists of industry - funded corruption, and secondly, how Rado, much like any other prominent accuser, is enslaved to an accusation narrative which ultimately relies on sources who repeat material which inevitably traces back to Ross Gelbspan and the clique of enviro - activists surrounding him when he and they got the first real media traction for the accusation.

A composite of real studies appearing in Nature and Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, the study presented evidence that CO2 dissipates from the atmosphere much more sluggishly than scientists had previously anticipated.

Although the faith has waned for some years, there is still no real alternative to the BBC propaganda, and this has probably happened through doom fatigue and financial crisis rather than much hard evidence.

But there is not much evidence of societies mobilizing and making sacrifices to meet gradually worsening conditions that threaten real disaster for future generations.

And thus, via a rational economic path, conjoined with inexorably strengthening scientific evidence that AGW is real, serious, and accelerating, we will all of us here on Climate Etc eventually learn to «just get along», very much in the spirit of America's Framers and Founders, eh Latimer Alder?

I make precisely as much money from granting agencies for shooting down Jelbring's absurd paper as I do from the Big Oil companies for stating that the preponderance of evidence suggests that the very real GHG - GHE is not a catastrophic threat under any reasonable scenario for the economic and technological development of the world for the rest of the 21st century.

BTW: There is no physical evidence that the assumption of a net positive feedback is correct, and much physical evidence to suggest that the real world feedbacks are net negative and will reduce the proposed direct warming effect of CO2 towards (closer too) 0.

There was already much evidence of this seven years ago, when I was writing my history of the scare, The Real Global Warming Disaster.