Sentences with phrase «much reasoning by»

Not exact matches

«We may feel past our «sell - by date» but we have legitimate reasons to stay, such as flexible hours, much - needed pay levels or great colleagues,» she said.
If we don't pay attention to what's really going on in our heads, we risk misjudging our peers — by giving them too much credit, or too little — for all the wrong reasons.
«They're making so much money by violating the law, there's little reason for them to comply.»
The reason so many were caught off guard by Hummingbird is that very few paid that much attention when Conversational Search was rolled out nearly two years ago.
These concessions are popular with families but Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page is calling for a review of the government's use of such «tax expenditures» on the grounds they don't receive as much review by Parliament as program spending, among other reasons.
The closest observers of trade politics and policy were mostly unmoved by Trump's negotiating list, however normal people might be surprised to learn that Canada's bankers have as much reason to fret as loggers and dairy farmers.
It's much better to create at least a 15 percent buffer, so if less jobs are created for any reason, your investors do not suffer by losing out on the jobs required for their green card application to be approved.
The reason Bitcoin mining consumes so much electricity is that producing each new Bitcoin requires solving a complex mathematical puzzle, through a cryptographic process performed by high - powered computers.
Every company is looking to trim paper consumption and waste, and being green is only part of the reason: As much as 3 percent of corporate revenues are spent on printing costs, according to research by Gartner Inc., largely because of the high price of toner and ink.
«One of the reasons I don't stop by their stores as much anymore is because I've often gone in and found the size 12 cubes totally empty,» she says, noting there are always lots of smaller sizes.
Much of the reason that PBR's stock still has as much value as it does is because investors are assuming that the company will be bailed out by Brazil if it's problems become too sevMuch of the reason that PBR's stock still has as much value as it does is because investors are assuming that the company will be bailed out by Brazil if it's problems become too sevmuch value as it does is because investors are assuming that the company will be bailed out by Brazil if it's problems become too severe.
Many argue that the invocation of the term «globalist» carries an undertone of anti-Semitism for a variety of reasons, not least of which is that it was originally deployed by Bannon, who has a much larger record of dabbling in anti-Semitism.
What I mean by this is keep helping out and adding value so when you finally ask for a link (and if you have a good reason), then you are much more likely to get it.
The reasoning behinds this stands that BTC currently has a higher monetary value over ETH and is expected to increase as much as 600 percent by 2020.
It is true that China's economy is slowing down, but lower growth rate in the country should not be a reason for global concern since the pace of growth is «as much by design as by accident,» noted the article, written by British businessman Martin Gilbert, who is the founder and CEO of Aberdeen Asset Management.
So but the reason why they've come down I think is because the actors who really wanted to you know promote their hard for a solution they would benefit by having a lot of transactions on the on the blockchain and they would benefit by having high transaction fees because they would you know strengthen their narrative that things are very urgent but now that SEGUI has been merged even though in practice right now it doesn't make that much difference because in reality the network is not really congested.
Record high prices in Asia have had several impacts, including providing economic incentive to bring on additional supply, maintaining a continued reason to burn much cheaper coal despite the negative environmental consequences and a search by consuming nations for secure supply options.
It is a mistake to think that one limits one's risk by spreading too much between enterprises about which one knows little and has no reason for special confidence.
A major reason why Iceland's economy has faired far better than other hard - hit nations is that its property prices have not fallen much, unlike Spain and Ireland, whose property prices have dropped by nearly 30 % and 50 %, respectively.
Consequently, even if the GDP growth figures reported by China's government bore some resemblance to reality (they don't), the reported growth wouldn't be a reason to be optimistic because so much of it is associated with wasteful spending.
Another reason developers are supporting ETC for is that compared to ETH, which is too much influenced by Ethereum Foundation, ETC follows the basic principles of a decentralized open source community, and it provides a freer environment for application development.
Much more plausible is the view that, for reasons rooted in technological and demographic change and reinforced by greater regulation of the financial sector, the global economy has difficulty generating demand for all that can be produced.
Chances are you've also justified not saving as much as you could or should by reasoning that your money is best spent now while you know you can enjoy it.
One of the main reasons that they are under so much pressure is because of the new regulations that have been brought in by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
His thesis is that integral truth (the combination of intuited truth, reasoned truth, and truth experienced through the senses) comes much closer to absolute truth than reason, alone and he gives a lot of examples of how truth has been intuited by Scientists, Mathematicians, artists, etc. throughout the ages to make his point.
In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.
I can show you where He promised to be with us in times of trouble and I can show you the reasons why men torment one another... for much of what you complain about is caused by MAN, not God.
I believe that man is, by nature, an exile and will never be self - sufficient or complete on this earth; that his chances of happiness and virtue, here, remain more or less constant through the centuries and, generally speaking, are not much affected by the political and economic conditions in which he lives; that the balance of good and ill tends to revert to a norm; that sudden changes of physical condition are usually ill, and are advocated by the wrong people for the wrong reasons; that the intellectual communists of today have personal, irrelevant grounds for their antagonism to society, which they are trying to exploit.
Wells begins by positing two kinds of spirituality present within evangelicalism, distinguished in his view not so much by different doctrinal starting - points as differing priorities assigned to moral reasoning.
America doesn't need anymore reason for blokes to plot against us and you're just pouring alcohol on an already burning fire.Anyways, as much as I am angry and hurt by this, I agree with this scholar - we can print more and more and as Muslim we need to set the standard of rising up and REMAINING calm and not be the stereotype the world thinks we are of angry backward water buffalos.
After I read the article by Evans, it occurred to me that perhaps one of the many reasons that there is so much hate, ridicule and criticism generated by Satan and spewed by the non-believers on this forum is because in a small way they can witness the hope and peace of mind that believers have and for some reason they resent those that have that which they do not have, as did Evan's mother had for his father after he had accepted Jesus as his Lord and King and Savior.
In the name of RELEGION... Oh, and another thing when are the so called GOOD MUSLIMS here in AMERICA and abroad going to stand up to the EXTREMIST / MUSLIMS???? They do not say much because they will be killed by their own MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD... I happen to know some US Muslims and they are very quiet and again there is a reason they are!
Competition is the reason behind much of our otherwise random activity and is the basic criterion by which we choose what is useful.
This is the reason for much of the exasperation sometimes felt by his critics.
Since reason is spiritual, personal, and hence fulfilled by love, then all these characteristics of reason must somehow be present in the Ground of reason, much as we would infer that the soil, in relation to the seed, is ultimately the source of its growth, flowering, and fruitfulness.
According to this understanding, the role of religion in political debate is not so much to supply these norms, as if they could not be known by non-believers — still less to propose concrete political solutions, which would lie altogether outside the competence of religion — but rather to help purify and shed light upon the application of reason to the discovery of objective moral principles.
Although I am very far from subscribing to the doctrine of the total depravity of man, it does seem to me to have been proved within my own lifetime that the problem of human evil is not much affected by better education, better housing, higher wages, holidays with pay, and the National Health Service — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
The only reason other nations didn't get ahead much was because they were also held back by the deluded.
It seems to have been proved within out time that the problem of human evil is not much affected by better education, better housing, higher wages, and holidays with pay — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.
This formulation makes sense, but I find myself compelled by Scripture, reason and experience to disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.
This, of course, does not mean that there; is, avoidably as well as unavoidably, much that is «undemocratic» in the Church, if for no other reason than that the baptized children must slowly be led by the Church to a free and responsible decision of personal faith without which no adult can be a member of the Church in the fullest sense.
DO NOT insist on religious leaders making their case by reasoned argument, but by bald assertion or authoritarian claims which are much easier to invent and promote.
Now, in the further interest of National Security» or, in the Fast and Furious matter, for reasons that remain unjustified and murky» it pleases some on the secularist left (even those who once fiercely opposed the very «Patriot Act» that seems almost tame by comparison) to cultivate a quiet disinterest as the government accrues ever more power, without so much as a «do what, now?»
The reason, though offered as much by faith as by sight, is that in Jesus Christ, as the apostle put it to the Colossians, «all things hold together,» even the well - publicized actions of well - known figures and the day - to - day activities of ordinary people carried on with never a thought about the scrutiny of history.
You may disagree with the premises of religion as much as you want, buddy, but the reasoning and conclusion leading to religious doctrine, especially catholic doctrine, are among the best works in logic in the history of mankind, made by men a lot more skilled in it than most who live today, I dare say.
There are a lot of reasons, much studied by the «experts» in pastoral ministry.
Latest was explosions in India marked as «Islamic Jihadists» and another in Pakistan although I was surprised that it was not marked as «Hindu Jihadists»... That would have had both Great Countries confront each other serving the purpose of other competing nations over the Rich Indian Peninsular... Believe me no nation fall back unless people of her own are traitors to it's nations principals and beliefs for the reason of Hate, Envy, Revenge, or Greeds towards material wealth even if by selling their Dignity and integrity or their family, tribe, community, the nation and the country it wouldn't mean much to them... and those can be found among every level of the one Society...
I don't mean this badly, but I think you and generally, most people in AA, have had their brains degraded so much by alcohol that logic and reasoning don't work.
The reasons are rooted in a long history of interaction between Christians and Muslims, much of which has been characterized by mistrust, misunderstanding and mutual antipathy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z