Sentences with phrase «much risk because»

I can't assume too much risk because my ability to replace those funds is limited.»

Those too - big - to - fail banks took on too much risk because they knew the government would save them from death.

The issue is, a lot of people don't have a lot of money to invest, and they also can't afford to take too much risk because they don't have that much to invest.

This is a much disciplined model and it allows money to be invested without as much risk because of the removal factors it has in place to such as projections of the future or emotion excesses.

Not exact matches

Also, consider how much money you've already saved.n «The classic example is an 86 - year - old with a $ 3 - million portfolio that» sninvested 100 % in guaranteed investment certificates (GICs) because he's annervous investor and was told he shouldn't take risks,» says Rechtshaffen.

That means only invest in what you know, because everything else involves too much risk.

During the 2015 blizzard that hit much of the northeast, workers at businesses that stayed open risked losing their jobs if they decided to stay away from work because of government travel warnings.

While it is not exactly full praise for the country, Deutsche Bank doesn't see much risk that shares will fall further, in part because investors are «overwhelmingly underweight» on the market.

When he made his first fortune after eBay bought PayPal, which he cofounded with Trump supporter Peter Thiel, Musk sank his entire net worth into a vision that was fraught with so much risk that he initially discouraged investors from signing up because the chance they would lose everything was so high.

I'm someone who always calculates the potential upsides and downsides, and I think many people take unnecessary risks: They either invest too much or too little because they don't do proper analysis.

«You don't want to go much higher, because you risk jeopardizing the cohesion of your team.»

A: Microloan interest rates are much higher than typical loan rates because their risks are higher: 12.5 % to 15 % is common.

For startups, it's more interesting and far more valuable to look at the risks and consequences of the kinds of changes that are much harder to see — even with Superman's X-ray vision and a crystal ball — because they're outside of the traditional scope of inquiry and investigation.

Because unaccredited investors are likely less aware of the risks associated with investing in startups, the potential for fraud and loss is that much greater.

Now I check my rollover IRA on a daily basis because I've got much higher risk with single stock investments.

Ironically, I didn't write much about investing until after I left my job in 2012 because I didn't want to risk blowing myself up at work if there was some sort of conflict of interest.

Inflation risk: is the chance that cash flow from an investment won't be worth as much in the future because of changes in purchasing power due to inflation.

But as long as the PBoC can continue to withstand pressure to lower interest rates — and it seems that the traditional poor relations between the PBoC and the CBRC have gotten worse in recent months, perhaps in part because the PBoC seems more determined to reduce financial risk and more willing to accept lower growth as the cost — China will move towards a system that uses capital much more efficiently and productively, and much of the tremendous waste that now occurs will gradually disappear.

The tariffs lasted a much shorter period than was envisioned because of the impending trade war, the flimsy rationale employed by the US to employ them, and risks to the US that were involved.

First, the networking effects — because oil is a relatively small contributor to our GDP and manufacturing is a relatively large contributor to our GDP, any damage done by currency effects driven by oil risks having an outsized effect on a much larger industry.

Even if income does not change by much, wealth can rise or fall because of changes in the attitude of investors toward risk, and declines in the value of collateral behind debt.

Taken together, these results suggest that funds with loss rates near the lower or upper bands of the 35 % -70 % range tend to underperform because they take too little or too much risk, respectively.

Then we want to give you a much higher credit limit because now you have a much better risk profile.

But, it's more difficult to control our own actions and thoughts than it is to over-trade or risk too much on a trade because you've convinced yourself that that «this» trade will be a winner.

Retirement is only a few years away, and he can not take on as much risk as the mid-life or young investor, because he needs a steady source of retirement income from his investments.

On the one hand we need to accumulate as much as possible because of our age and lost time to make up for, but for the same reasons we can't afford the losses that go along with those higher risk / potentially higher gain stocks.

Higher risk because much of the technology is still in testing and hasn't hit mass market yet, but there is potential for big future payoff.

Because these have short term trades, you can turn over more cash — and more profits — but because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock Because these have short term trades, you can turn over more cash — and more profits — but because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock market.

Because interest rates have been coming down for the past 30 + years, generating low risk passive income is becoming that much harder every year.

Binary options is much less risker than Forex because you can limit the amount you lose in each trade.

A successful investor would never choose portfolio D because portfolio A has the same expected return but much less risk.

It's risky to invest too much in bonds or other low risk assets, because those equal to lower returns.»

Meb: Well, you know, I mean it's been eight years going on now since we've had the bear market in the U.S. And it's funny because, you know, we'll talk about this in a second but you know, the biggest mistake we see, particularly younger investors make when investing, is they often having not experienced a loss or a devastating loss, in general, they take on way too much risk.

The downside is that because the risk is generally lower, you may not see as much growth as you would had you invested the money directly into the market.

Goldman charged so much because it put its own balance sheet at risk to raise a large amount of money quickly for a fund that then lacked a credit rating.

I bailed out when gold started to rally because I believe that trade selection is only a small part of successful trading... risk management is much more important... and the first chapter in the book on risk management is, «Cut your losses and let your profits run.»

These include a much better customer experience (especially on mobile, which is a key driver for e-commerce in emerging markets), better privacy (particularly relevant for cross-border payments), the ability to do smaller transaction sizes, a global and fast - growing merchant acceptance network, and of course, for many people in emerging markets, the ability to transact online whereas otherwise they would not be able to, either because they don't have a credit card in the first place, or their credit card is rejected because of fraud risk associated with a particular country.

«Smaller, stand - alone payment systems for which there are many substitutes — like bitcoin — should generally require much less intensive oversight and regulation because they pose much less risk to the Canadian financial system as a whole,» Deslongchamps told the news publication.

The worst thing you can do is to sell at the bottom because you took on too much risk.

People looking for a bubble in the broader tech sector tend to watch biotech moves because those companies --- often venture - backed and often beckoning with potentially explosive results — are considered barometers of how much appetite investors have for risk.

When finally confronted with the truth, groupthink becomes fiercely defensive because there's been too much investment of time / energy to risk a demoralizing tale told by a long - gone outsider.

She's expecting a baby with Toby, and says explicitly she doesn't want to celebrate or plan much because it's a high - risk pregnancy.

How to brainwash your kids so they follow societal norms, and do not ask too many questions, but not so much that they become complete retards - because teaching them to think for themselves entails too much risk.

I am not really all that concerned because my PhD is in Cholesterol Metabolism and I have no other risk factors (except maybe a bit too much stress!)

The American Heart Association has warned people against too much consumption because it is known to raise the risk of heart attacks, strokes, and other fatal illnesses.

I know that peanut butter gets a bad rap because of the potential for the fungus aflatoxin (which is considered to be carcinogenic) to be present, but good news is that our agriculture practices have gotten much better and buying organic, roasted peanuts exponentially reduces the risk for toxicity.

Mr Watts believes this can entice Australian growers to produce more organic food because it will eliminate much of the risk that comes with not using traditional pest - management methods.

I can believe this because I can understand Real wanting to get some money for him rather than risking loosing him for free but then again there was so many rumours in the summer saying it was a done deal when it wasn't, I hope it's true he'd be a great solid DM I just hope he wouldn't get injured as much as he has in the past.

Likewise, one reason L.A. can pay that much money is because they've spent the past 30 years paying for success and taking risks and refusing to rebuild, which in turn made them the most valuable and visible team in the NBA, with massive revenue streams that allow them to overpay for future success, guaranteeing more value.

RvP done the same and so did Nasri, lets hope because Ozil cost so damn much that the board will spend rather than risk losing him for a loss.