Many economists would say making this kind of decision depends on how
much risk a person is willing to endure — in other words, on personality.
Constantly reassess your goals and capabilities, as well as your team's goals and capabilities, and know how
much risk each person can bear.
But like any casino, an insurance company has a team of math experts that calculate how
much risk a person is to their profits.
Not exact matches
People have been conditioned to try to beat the benchmark, but doing that (if it can be done — there's a lot of evidence to suggest it can't) involves taking on too
much risk.
That's why young
people have often shunned ObamaCare, leaving the
risk pools overpopulated with older, expensive enrollees, a phenomenon that explains
much of the big increases in premiums.
There are no studies showing this combination of ingredients is safe, and eating too
much saturated fat could present
risks for
people with elevated cholesterol levels.
«I think since, really, I'm a conservative investor, that experience of being in debt and also the experience of seeing things happen to
people who took too
much financial
risk and got hurt, led me to be pretty conservative — I'm a guy that looks for singles and not home runs,» Bach said.
I'm someone who always calculates the potential upsides and downsides, and I think many
people take unnecessary
risks: They either invest too
much or too little because they don't do proper analysis.
«It's your friendship and you do want to tread lightly, both in terms of how
much risk is that
person capable of exposing themselves to financially, and balancing the expectations,» Brun de Pontet says.
«There is a vast number of
people out there, particularly with the levels of information that are available today, who are able to understand
risk, who are able to make sensible decisions, who may not be fabulously wealthy but should be able to get
much wealthier.
«Our monetary policy is so
much more reckless and so
much more aggressively pushing the
people in this room and everybody else out the
risk curve that we're doubling down on the same policy that really put us there.»
Essentially our offer is that we handle the production & distribution and then share revenue with the
people who help create the works for a period of time (12 months) in exchange for their work at half pay — As shoots only last a day or two max, there is very little
risk for
people to participate as it's a good deal and we already know everyone in the business so there is little downtime building any of the infrastructure or
much less cold calling anyone
Of course, these investments carry a lot higher
risk thresholds which make them
much less viable as investment vehicles for a majority of
people, but regardless it's time for the technologies that have improved public markets for the individual investor to help them go private as well.
You may not want to do this if your existing 401k has high costs or limited investment choices, but I think most plans now have low cost index funds to choose from, so for many
people, there wouldn't be
much downside
risk.
Each
person must decide for themselves how
much risk they want to take and their PURPOSE for investing.
Is
risk measured by the fact that
people are quitting their day jobs and taking the leap of entrepreneurship — too
much generalisation.
The issue is, a lot of
people don't have a lot of money to invest, and they also can't afford to take too
much risk because they don't have that
much to invest.
If digital natives spring to the defence of Cambridge Analytica and Facebook too quickly or with too
much vehemence they face the genuine
risk of being associated with all the things — Trump, Russia, dark closed systems for thought control, right wing politics — that most of these bright young
people should be opposed to.
These include a
much better customer experience (especially on mobile, which is a key driver for e-commerce in emerging markets), better privacy (particularly relevant for cross-border payments), the ability to do smaller transaction sizes, a global and fast - growing merchant acceptance network, and of course, for many
people in emerging markets, the ability to transact online whereas otherwise they would not be able to, either because they don't have a credit card in the first place, or their credit card is rejected because of fraud
risk associated with a particular country.
People looking for a bubble in the broader tech sector tend to watch biotech moves because those companies --- often venture - backed and often beckoning with potentially explosive results — are considered barometers of how
much appetite investors have for
risk.
I suspect that we ministers flee from the parental images which our
people are forever placing upon our shoulders not so
much from concern over the mental maturity of our
people but rather in an attempt to avoid one of the chief
risks and burdens of Christian ministry.
«It's as
much about reducing the
risk of another earthquake hitting
people so hard as it is about recovery.»
Where are the
people who love truth so
much that they are willing to
risk losing a friendship — to
risk hearing the words, «No friend of mine would talk to me that way»?
Even today there are many Jewish voices in Israel and elsewhere
risking much in order to call for justice to the Palestinian
people.
Do you have any idea how
much money we spend on keeping track of
people in this country who like sharia law??? WHY are we allowing more to come here, and up the costs and
risks even more?
Many
people in that country have
risked much, personally, to cooperate with the American project; to abandon....
In one of the most important passages in the Education of Cyrus, Cambyses (Cyrus's father) gives Cyrus the following advice: «If someone deceives often, instilling the expectation of good things, such a
person ends up not being able to persuade even when he speaks of true sources of hope... One must, as
much as possible preserve trust in one's own encouragement in the face of the greatest
risks.»
People are scared of new ideas in architecture, but with a little bit of researching it becomes clear that straw bale building is perfectly viable, not so
much a
risk as just not yet common.
There is so
much for all of us that hides Jesus from us — the church itself hides him, all the hoopla of church with ministers as lost in the thick of it as everybody else so that the holiness of it somehow vanishes away to the point where services of worship run the
risk of becoming only a kind of performance — on some Sundays better, on some Sundays worse — and only on the rarest occasions does anything strike to the quick the way that little girl's cry did with every last
person who heard her realizing that Jesus didn't show for any of them — the mystery and miracle of Jesus with all his extraordinary demands upon us, all his extraordinary promises.
While I was lying there (we really didn't speak to each other
much), I was thinking about some
people I've talked with recently who feel the very real
risk of being more open and vulnerable.
The American Heart Association has warned
people against too
much consumption because it is known to raise the
risk of heart attacks, strokes, and other fatal illnesses.
people who are at
risk for the condition need to be that
much more aware than the average
person about their sugars and how it affects them.
This evaluation should include research that indicates health
risks for
people who consume too
much sodium as well as health
risks from consuming too little sodium.»
we have no cover for CB at all then, Chambers needs to sit on the bench and be healthy for covering RB and CB as
much as i want to see what hes like as a DM its too high of a
risk to play him there atm, I'd def go for bellerin for RB though hes so fast and has tremendous technical ability, One
person i think wenger should of taken to dortmund is diaby just incase hes needed would be nice for diaby to get a good 60 min game but i do nt think hes ready for CL just yet since he hasnt even featured in the PL yet but then again no harm in taking him since hes been linking up with bellerin pretty well in the U21's we must remember we have some really good youngsters in the squad than can fill in some of the spaces.
We are sorry if we seem ungrateful sometimes Admin, you are really doing a GREAT job making me especially happy and i don't know about any other
person cause i might not comment very often but i visit this site every single day of my life to read comments from everyone and it really makes my day... So thank you very
much and nevertheless, i personally am tired of reading articles of Alexis Sanchez now... I must admit i personally thought Sanchez was holding Arsenal to ransom before, until Wenger came out to say he has never asked for a transfer request and i think the club has made there intentions known that they don't want to sell him, not even to a title rival and i think that is why city are now going after mbappe, seems they are desperately in need of a striker and if they are that desperate they should fork out 80m for Sanchez if they really need him, I LIKE THE
RISK ARSENAL IS TAKING AS REGARDS SANCHEZ..
Infections, maybe the wraps, and mouth guards will reduce
much of it, but there is a lot higher
risk of getting messed up infections when your punching
people in the mouth barehanded, no one would really consider that until see guys medically suspended for it.
Its only natural that if you spend 4 months staring at a bunch of
people from Missisippi then your going to think the first
person you see from Alabama is the bell of the ball so I cant fault Condoleeza Rice for trusting the evidence she was given a little too
much - a lone blemish on a otherwise pristine record of determining which organizatons pose the biggest
risk to others.
«They themselves look more shy than usual, they don't take as
much risk as we know them to do, so
people take advantage of that and go for it when they play against them now.
I think anyone that is willing to put that concern aside because they love their animals oh so very
much as to
risk their kids rather than putting their own children first, is being very judgmental of
people who OBVIOUSLY are NOT YOU.
Yes, mouthwash, that you spit out after using it, is believed by some
people to pose too
much of a
risk to fetuses, and this is actually a thing
people are discussing and fear - mongering (and, of course, mom - shaming) about.
Yes
people die in car accidents wearing their seatbelts, but the RELATIVE
RISK of that happening compared to those that aren't wearing seatbelts is
much LOWER.
Well, that would be because that the
risks of doing nothing vary so
much by
person, right?
And they were exposed to parents who were also narcicistic, or had character problems, and if we can get them in touch with their feelings about how they were raised, then sometimes the empathy can increase and that's a
much more workable
person to be intimate with, but without empathy, it's hard to really extend your trust to somebody because it's always the
risk that even if they don't intend to hurt you, they will miss the signals that they are going to hurt you.
Home birth families are generally quite aware that hospitals are full of germs, sick
people, and put them at
risk for poor outcomes simply because they walked through the door, but there isn't
much discussion about going beyond birthing in your own to germs, to making a concerted effort to birth in a green environment.
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/is-breech-vaginal-delivery-safe/
Much of the discussion in the comments was scientifically literate
people saying that «630 dead babies» was meaningless, that we need to look at relative
risk and rates.
Lower estimations of how many
people safely bedsharing in our population significantly makes crib sleeping look
much,
much safer than bedsharing because parents are not afraid to say that their babies sleep in cribs; but many who bedshare and their babies live, and are not therefore counted in relative
risks of crib vs. bedsharing statistics.
The latter two are
risk assessments which will have a
much greater impact on your life than Brexit and
people seem to make them just fine while only occasionally having nervous breakdowns.
The targeting is the key element, letting an anti-Trump campaign deliver messages to the right
people without
much risk of blowback.
And while cynicism about the deal abounds (
much of which, it has to be said, may turn out to be well founded — nothing about this deal is
risk - free), very few
people seriously disagree that the concessions Nick Clegg and his team wrung from David Cameron were very considerable indeed.
He said: «We should not worry too
much about
people getting rich, so long as they can show they are genuinely paid for performance and the real
risks they take, which in many cases is precisely what we have not seen in many reaches of the financial - services sector in the last 10 years.»