And there's too
much robust science to suggest otherwise.
Not exact matches
However,
much more can be achieved when the
science, engineering and health communities embrace human rights as an area suitable for and deserving of
robust inquiry, and become an influential voice in the defense of human rights.
Much of the evidence for the negative effects of screen use in children and teenagers is not based on
robust enough
science says the British Psychological Society (BPS) in its new briefing paper «Changing behaviour: Children, adolescents and screen use».
The critical missing piece of information here is that
science related to climate change is
much more
robust than what can be challenged by excerpts from a few private emails (of hundreds) stolen from a server.
The most obvious one is that the
science is well funded and given
much attention because it is
robust and deserves it.
I will say this for US Sen. James Inhofe (R - Exxon): his relentlessly ideological view of
science isolates him from the world, but at least that isolation is so
robust and seamless that there's not
much risk of reality intruding and causing him to frighten the horses by saying something rational.
Speaking as someone who very
much accepts the mainstream
science on the climate anomaly and who favours
robust ubiquitous mitigation measures and regards nuclear power as a legitimate player in the solution, that's not how I read the role of nuclear power in the advocacy of the agnorati.