Sentences with phrase «much sacrifice for»

Back to Caroline, it's amazing how much she sacrificed for others.

Not exact matches

When you outsource your social media outreach efforts, you often sacrifice quality for quantity, and in the past year we discovered that if we take our social media efforts in house and spend less time on posting but more time on developing great content and promoting that, we have much better results and feedback.

In the end, the Stelvio shows that the Italians can do a capable «everyday» luxury SUV (The Maserati Levante is a bit too much for everyday duty) without sacrificing that which makes Italian cars special.

-- of the same problems as working mothers do, in particular worrying that they're sacrificing too much family time for work:

But when her every duty is laid out in front of her and she realizes it isn't feasible for her to manage the workload without sacrificing her sanity is so much worse.

(During the beta, the average response to the question «How much privacy are you willing to sacrifice for your security?»

She wrote that she «knew that my birth mother loved me so much that she wanted to give me a better life,» going on to write that «If anything, I would thank my birth mother for loving me enough to make such a huge sacrifice.»

Researchers at Pew argue that the recent decrease in birthrate has as much to do with the Great Recession in 2008 as it does with the increase of women who are not willing to sacrifice their careers for family.

But the much heralded sacrifices made by Chrysler executives did not last long - just about long enough to secure federal support for the company.

There should be a public discussion about how much safety we'd be willing to sacrifice for the convenience.

This might be too much of a sacrifice for the true - blue coffee lover, but if you could go either way, keep in mind that a cup of tea brewed at home can cost as little as four cents per cup, compared to 12 - 43 cents for less - than - fancy home - brewed coffee, according to Living Stingy.

For those that get offended by how much you are investing each month I think it is easy to judge someone after years of hard work, sacrifice, and consistent investing.

Presidential oratory provides much of the supporting evidence for McDougall's ideas about civil religion, from President William McKinley's implication that the United States had not so much conquered Cubans as it had ministered to them («Are we not made better for the effort and sacrifice, and are not those we serve lifted up and blessed?»)

But if Jesus loves you so much he's willing to sacrifice himself for you, I'll accept some of you back.»?

hahahaha... not much of a sacrifice when jesus never died to begin with... more like a good drunk where he slept for 3 days.

Because we have shared so much... because I believe Him to be a big, teddy bear under the sometimes rough exterior... because He protects me and is there for me... because I have seen Him sacrifice for others... I can not even conceive of Him being evil.

jesus died for your sins so there is no need for animal sacrifice, eating kosher, avoiding a woman when she has her period, etc etc. god suddenly became much more of a sweet and loving god, where before he was jealous and prone to killing people that defied him.

How much effort and self - sacrifice am I willing to give so as to live my life for God?

Don't you just feel so much more holy when you're sacrificing everything on the altar of doing more for God?

The role of the divine is much pondered» the furiously indignant Cain gets no more explanation for why his sacrifice was rejected here than he did in Genesis» but the actions are all committed by humans.

The political theory assumed that people benefit so much from that order that it is rational for them to enter into contractual agreements that sacrifice considerable personal freedom.

When you have a world filled with liars and adulterers and murderers and greed and selfishness (even though we know what's right and what's wrong but we do it anyway) and the God that created you loves you so much that he needs to sacrifice his Son for all of us who have not kept his Law, in order to wipe out those terrible sins, then you should be praying that you're counted as one who kept his Laws.

Such accountability requires sacrifice and, frankly, that it just too much for 99 % of the people, of which I would include myself.

There are those who strongly disagree with this position, who maintain that God sides with the poor and therefore if we are to side with God we must be among the poor, or who maintain that what matters for our own soul is how much we sacrifice.

The only possible textual basis for this reading makes much of the fact that it is an angel rather than God Himself who calls a halt to the sacrifice.

He can be very disillusioned if he has observed such a law (that of burial of the dead in the earth, for example), perhaps at the cost of considerable moral efforts and personal sacrifices, and now suddenly has to see that things — if we may so express it — are all at once much easier.

In Christianity, and Christianity alone, all these negative elements of pagan mythology are stripped away, and we are told that God loves us so much, that He does not want us to sacrifice our own children, but instead, He will sacrifice His own Son for us.

It tells many of you who want to offer sacrifices for the good of the church — countless hours of volunteer service as elders and deacons or a lifetime in demanding and low - paid pastoral ministries — that your life choices are so much more sinful than the rest of ours that we've had to erect special barriers to keep you from laying your gifts at the altar.

Come on get real samson old testement its in there wilful sin my definition is walking away from the Lord and doing opur own thing knowing what you should do but still do what you want to do.In the life of Samson WE SEE Gods forgiveness and the sacrifice is the same as today repentence we are saved by the grace of God if we turn from our own way.He was disobedient to his parents and to the Lord his heart was no different from ours wilfully disobedient he chose sin over the Lord all the time sleeping with prostites and lying with foreign woman going his own way and yet God saves him not only that he was Gods chosen instrument to deliver his people.The sad part is his term was only 20 years if he had walking in the ways of the Lord he should have had that ministry for 40 years that is the term of completion.We cut ourselves short when we choose sin over the Lord which is an idol by the way.We all have those areas in our lives that we keep to ourselves thats wilful they are our demons and our comforters.Until we surrender all to the Lord we can not be overcomers and will be influenced by satan like samson it is clear warning to us wilful sin or making sin an idol in our lives has consequences better to serve the Lord with all our hearts even though samson did nt for much of his life God still showed him his grace and faithfullness.You can also see wilful sin in the Life of David yet God saves him but not all were saved in the life of saul as he wouldnt listen to the Lord and kept walking according to his flesh.

Ex-President Eliot, of Harvard, says that the strongest appeal that he was ever able to bring to bear on wayward boys consisted in making clear to them how much they had been sacrificed for and how much their failure would mean to those who cared.

Dr. Eliot really was appealing to the motive of the Cross; he was sending those boys away saying to themselves, whether they ever put it into words or not, «I have been sacrificed for, and my life is worth too much to throw away.»

I know many productive intelligent people that have sacrificed much for their employers only to be laid off for the sake of corporate profits as the jobs go overseas were labour is cheaper.

Meat sacrificed to idols was a live issue in the church for decades and was very much on the mind of John as he wrote his Revelation to the seven churches.

It is infinitely comic that a man, moved unto tears, so much moved that not only tears but sweat trickle from him, can sit and read, or hear, representations of self - denial, of the nobility of sacrificing one's life for the truth — and then the next instant — one, two, three, slap - dash, almost with the tears still in his eyes — is in full swing, in the sweat of his brow, with all his might and main, helping falsehood to conquer.

To all appearances the balance [of the Crusades] was disastrous: So much suffering, so many sacrifices for so little.

This may not make much sense to those of us who don't sacrifice other living things to atone for our sins.

An old culture, like an old bear, can suddenly whiff the dank odor of its own mortality; and then it is tempted, and tempted deeply, to sacrifice its ideals for the preservation of its life — and thus to hasten the very demise in history that it fears so much.

They have heard demands for sacrifice of comforts but have not heard much promise of salvation for them.

Either every such passage simply emphasizes the humanity under some aspect of limitation, or else it cites the humiliation of the earthly career to illustrate how much God or Christ (Paul apparently makes no distinction between them in this connection) was willing to sacrifice for man's sake.

Yeah, because just forgiving things without the need for a human sacrifice was too much for him to handle.

I am not religious, I just follow the word of God, don't care much for mundane activities or graven images or religious relics, and I know that the good Lord loves obedience over sacrifice.

But again the point of Jesus dying isn't that God requires a sacrifice but rather the point is that God loves us so much that he was willing to send His son to die for us

Let's recognize for each other that we've all sacrificed much to hold this role.

As for your so - called «clear distinction between personal belief and social norms» I pretty much think that you are talking about Luther and his crew: even the Romans (for all their tolerance) tried to get the Christians to sacrifice to the old gods or the Emperor.

When a person dedicates his life and sacrifices much for ministry, this is a life shattering experience.

God loves us in spite of our sin, so much he sent his Son as a sacrifice for us.

I often wonder as they came to offer sacrifices, how much in their heart did they believe that doing that performing this action actually forgave them or was it just a ritual for them.

And the politics that results from the dialogue is ghastly indeed, because the integration of a single soul calls for much more sacrifice of the parts to the whole than can ever be expected of individual human persons in a city.

If, for instance, you were to condemn a religion of human or animal sacrifices by virtue of your subjective sentiments, and if all the while a deity were really there demanding such sacrifices, you would be making a theoretical mistake by tacitly assuming that the deity must be non-existent; you would be setting up a theology of your own as much as if you were a scholastic philosopher.

This for Nathanson is a psychological task that at first seemed «overwhelming» and ultimately required «every iota» of knowledge she had gained through her study and practice of psychology — particularly the art of not sacrificing too much for her children: «Central to the mothering instinct within me is a predisposition to recognize and meet the needs of my children, voluntarily sacrificing my own at times when there is a conflict.»