Sentences with phrase «much science goes»

Not exact matches

The movies rarely win critical accolades, much less Oscar nominations, and to date, no science fiction movie has ever gone home with the statuette.

Plus, as UC Berkeley's Greater Good Science Center recently pointed out, a growing number of studies also show that in specific situations, too much good cheer is actually counterproductive (beyond the obvious like going through the grieving process).

Partly because you've been spending so much time extrapolating, you now have to go back to the science.

«We now know that young people who are going into the office for the first time are making decisions about who they work for not based on how much they're getting paid, but on the space design,» ASID president Randy Fiser told members of the design community at the recent Science of Design Conference at Liberty Science Center in New Jersey.

Hopefully science can figure that out but I am not going to hold my breath... it is hard to know who to believe with so much conflicting bias research.

This doesn't go into the realm of atheism vs. theism as much as it does go into the realm of science vs. nonsense.

Not so much for the supernatural but for everyday guidance for a thousand ethical questions people are going have driven by science and money — as well as recognizing divine moments.

We kinda want to go to the opposite ditch, because there is too much hot air being passed in that high science camp, and it gives one a nauseating feeling!

Much of the business of science is in imagining stuff we can't see (representational for all of our senses), then going forth to prove our hypothesis.

Do you have any idea how much fraud goes on in Science?

Science may tell us much that the biblical writers did not know about the processes by which God continually fashions an unfinished world, but it can not go beyond the great truth stated in Genesis 1:1, «In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.»

If you thik so much of god and so little of science, when you get really really sick do you go to church or the doctor?

A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).

All religions provide answers, but if you go back and reread the texts of any religion, they don't make sense in this day and age, but science, and academic study has shown much of it to be wrong.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

I find that science offers much better explanations for gravity, energy, emotions, evolution, the universe, and conscience, collaboration, photons, the evolution of eyes, and on and on it goes... I guess the point is... Prove that God exists, and we can talk.

You're going back much further than when science had developed proper methodology.

Science is wonderful and this field is very interesting, but if we're going to get any presently useful information from the specific field of geological dating, it's much, much more recent stuff like climate evidence.

Those who have read the book know that Tickle goes into much greater detail about the questions and challenges raised by cognitive science, literary deconstruction, higher criticism, Freud, Jung, Campbell, Einstein, Heisenbuerg, and many other philosophical / scientific / cultural movements.

We see the same flour / water combination behaving differently from one time of year to another (or even from day to day); and it's as much experience as science that teaches us what's going on, and how to adapt.

Dalglish added: «He's got off to a fantastic start but it's a really difficult run of games coming up and I'm sure, as he said this morning, he is going to work as hard as anybody else and if everybody works together it's not rocket science -(if) everybody works together you've got a much better chance of success.»

No matter how much I wish for my child to sleep longer streches, I have choosen not to go down the CIO path - it's not for our family, based on instinct and backed by science, it's just not what we are doing.

As someone working somewhere in the midst of that nexus of «science, values, ethics and politics» you describe (economics, international relations, technology... the climate policy list goes on), I do recognise what you're talking about, but I really don't see that we should very much care.

«For example, [measuring] chlorophyll a will give you information about how much biological activity is going on, and eventually more information about the concentration of carbon dioxide within the ocean and the atmosphere,» said Yoshihisa Shirayama, executive director of research at the Japan Agency for Marine - Earth Science and Technology in Tokyo.

Right now if you asked the National Science Foundation how much they thought they were going to be funding in paleontology over the next 30 years, they'd probably say zero, because they're not very much into historical sScience Foundation how much they thought they were going to be funding in paleontology over the next 30 years, they'd probably say zero, because they're not very much into historical sciencescience.

«Brian wouldn't have much hope of going to [the National Science Foundation] or [the U.S. Geological Survey] to get funding for these projects,» Brune says.

But DOE's Office of Science will spend only half its budget on work by university researchers, with much of the rest going to its ten national laboratories and research facilities, from Brookhaven in New York state to the Pacific Northwest National Lab in Washington state.

«Your reach via these platforms is so much larger than just word - of - mouth or presenting at a forum for science and technology policy or going to a discipline - specific meeting and talking about your research,» Aicher said.

«The daily practice of going to the lab and indulging in scientific research absorbs you so much that there is very little left for other explorations, especially if you're ambitious» in science, he says.

If the system goes wrong and there's an accident at Sizewell B, it won't be much consolation to be told that the problem was nothing to do with science, it was really one of art.

Parker encourages you to try and gain as much insight in the world of sport and possible science jobs as you can before and during your studies: «Go to the sports, talk to professional sports associations, athletes, coaches, sports scientists about what it is really like; it doesn't matter at which level.»

Unfortunately for the computer science student, this book does not go into much detail or theory anywhere.

If you start the habits of good chemical and biological hygiene in your lab, you will find that cleaning up the lab goes much smoother when health and safety officers arrive for inspection, giving you more time to devote to doing science rather than cleaning it up!

There's no way the relatively small corps of American science journalists could adequately track goings - on in the much larger research community without input from those of us who can more closely monitor individual studies at individual institutions.

«We give our scientists much greater freedom to go where the science takes them to do innovative things; we're not constantly hounding them about expenses and minor administrative details,» says Ross Grossman, Regeneron's vice president of human resources.

But an in - depth analysis of grant data from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) on page 1015 in this issue of Science finds that the problem goes much deeper than impressions.

As Science went to press, it remained unclear exactly how much money would be targeted and when it would be taken, but researchers expect the government to grab funds set aside to pay for research overheads.

Well the science would still move right along because the scientists are all going to see it in the actual journals, so we are not interfering with the progress of science, and by the time we would actually write about this stuff there would be a much clearer opinion about whether or not this was a real finding and whether or not it held up in any sort of way.

When a Nobel prizewinner threatens to sue colleagues, and when they deny his access both to the regular means of scientific publication and to the primary data on the basis of which his findings have been refuted, there must be much more going on besides matters of science.

DiChristina: I was just going to say, that's one thing also what occurred to me is that to me is a lesson in microcosm — because it's just a paragraph what Steve just read to everybody — that shows why it's so important in science to remove all your confounds, you know, remove all the variables so that you can find really what is at the heart of thing, and to me that that's the lesson that science has much more thoroughly adopted probably at this point and can speak with, you know, much greater authority; when something actually is a finding you need to be able to remove all the potential things that could be interfering with the conclusion that you're trying to make.

«No one knows how much carbon from permafrost soils will be released to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, but to answer that question, we have to know how it's going to happen,» said Rose Cory, an aquatic chemist and lead author of the study, published in Science in late August.

But much of the rest goes toward goals largely absent from the planetary science community's consensus planning, namely the new push for lunar exploration.

Neither are sure that they want to go into science yet — but they were surprised at how much they were already learning at Family Sciencscience yet — but they were surprised at how much they were already learning at Family ScienceScience Days.

«Going forward we will need much more precise constraints on the magnitude of oxygenation and the physiological requirements of early animals to continue testing the impact of oxygenation on Cambrian animal life,» said Erik Sperling, an assistant professor of geological and environmental sciences at Stanford University, and first author on the paper.

You don't need to use much imagination to reconstruct it; if you just squint your eyes a bit, you could almost believe it was sleeping... It will go down in science history as one of the most beautiful and best preserved dinosaur specimens — the Mona Lisa of dinosaurs.»

Well, since I hate the relentless (though entirely necessary) nagging of NPR fund drives so much I have refrained from mentioning the Science Bloggers for Students Fund Drive and the microscope sub-drive I'm running (and if you missed it the first time, go check out the cool videos here) since I first announced it.

Dr. James Hansen, who recently retired as head of NASA's Goddard Institute, says we're going to be hit much sooner and harder than we've been told by mainstream science.

Vent: You don't even need a human handy: A report in Psychological Science found that when people scribbled down negative thoughts on a piece of paper and threw it away, they were much less affected by them later; evidently, chucking bad vibes tells your brain they are gone for good.

I'm doing a clinical research, writing grants, writing papers, and going down the academic route, but I care so much about the world that I'm also teaching the public, doing TED Talks, creating a website, writing books, and giving the public the same tools that I'm researching and letting them know, «Here's the science behind why I've designed it this way and why I'm doing the science this way.»

The science is clear: if your goal is to burn as much fat in as little time as possible, then HIIT is the way to go.