Sentences with phrase «much science out»

Activated Charcoal — Although there isn't much science out there explaining why activated charcoal has long been used to relieve digestive gasses.
Cassini was running out of fuel, and mission managers wanted to get as much science out of the veteran probe while protecting Saturn's moons.

Not exact matches

Or check out the complete CNN article for much more on the science of EQ.
The H1B highly skilled immigrant visa is limited to 65,000, with an additional 20,000 for holders of advanced degrees — not much when you consider that U.S. universities pump out 1 science graduate for every five China does.
Since then, additional high - profile studies have come out — including an article, published in the journal of Psychological Science in the Public Interest, which found no evidence that brain games improve everyday cognition — but the topic is still very much up for debate.
With this picture in mind, it is clear that the healthcare debate, particularly as it played out last week, is very much a complex system, and can be constructively viewed through a systems science lens.
Plus, as UC Berkeley's Greater Good Science Center recently pointed out, a growing number of studies also show that in specific situations, too much good cheer is actually counterproductive (beyond the obvious like going through the grieving process).
You see, there's an entire subfield of computer science that can roughly be described as «pulling information out of things that look exactly like the Bitcoin transaction graph», and while these researchers haven't done much to Bitcoin yet — that's only because they're still fighting over the grant money.
And in truth, there's no exact science to figuring out how much you should -LSB-...]
But it is much, much more logical to use science to try and find out why we are here than just settling for whatever holy book it is you worship as truth and leaving it at that.
Hopefully science can figure that out but I am not going to hold my breath... it is hard to know who to believe with so much conflicting bias research.
no matter how much it may seem to make sense, many many peices are missing and as far as im concerned, science usually changes its mind every ten years or so, so ill wait this one out.
Science writers Carl Sagan and Fritjof Capra have pointed out similarities between the latest scientific understanding of the age of the universe, and the Hindu concept of a «day and night of Brahma», which is much closer to the current known age of the universe than other creation myths.
This is what I love so much about storytelling, especially fantasy and science fiction: When the ordinary is depicted in an unfamiliar world, the contrast helps it stand out, helps us grasp it and learn to value it again.
As Whitehead accurately points out, much of the conflict between science and religion stems from the reluctance, especially on the part of religion, to embrace adventure.
Though much of today's science is applied science — the: discovery of new processes and the making of new products to satisfy human wants — it all rests on the desire to find out with certainty what can be known about the world of nature.
There are plenty of hypocrites out there, in Science, religion, pretty much every belief system.
But when we deal with the individual entities of which these are composed, the ones into which science analyzes them, these turn out to behave in ways much more suggestive of subjectivity.
And many other physicists now concur that the early phases of the universe have always held out much more promise for evolving into life, mind, and spirituality than earlier science had allowed.
Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
Once you're outside the Academic circle, out in the field where real science takes place, you'll find the percentage of Evolutionists much lower, more around 60 %.
Your kid asks you for more money to spend on Candy, say... you know he / she eats too much candy already so you say no... Then the kid who was supposed to cover her school science project out of pocket money that she saved says she will spend the pocket money on candy and you pay for the science project.
We're talking about a state that wants to take evolution out of its science textbooks and Thomas Jefferson out of the history textbooks for being too much of a «radical.»
Science and religion are not mutually exclusive... all Christians do not believe just what they are told and some actually think «work out their faith», and we all don't just blindly believe in a «sky fairy» blah, blah, blah, God is like believing in the Easter bunny, religion is just here to control you... STUPID... do you know how much wisdom is in the bible?
Like I said, you're out of your depth in science talk, and you don't have as much practice as Chad at being dishonest, so don't try.
And he needed no less, Gleick might have added, what three centuries ago Giambattista Vico was calling fantasia, that faculty of imaginative understanding so conspicuously lacking in the Enlightenment absolutists who, as Isaiah Berlin has pointed out, did so much to create the rift between the sciences and the humanities.
Nevertheless, recent developments in the scientific culture, especially as we see them reported in books like James Gleick's Chaos: Making a New Science, suggest that Snow's greatest mistake was his failure to take into account the extent to which the literature of science is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to liteScience, suggest that Snow's greatest mistake was his failure to take into account the extent to which the literature of science is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to litescience is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to litescience ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to literature.
Much of the science of ecology is concerned with finding out how this is done.
«One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering.»
Much of the western tradition in literature and science was generated out of a «church» that is nothing like what you portray.
I studied enough science up through my Masters degree and beyond to find out that I enjoy it, but to also appreciate how much it reflects the limits of our intellectual capacity as human beings.
i never baked much before i found out i had celiac, and now i am actually using my kitchenaid and learning how baking is really a science.
Too much time from the end of the season to the draft to try to make a science out of something that is not science.
This is such a great sensory activity for little ones, H doesn't understand the science behind the way the goo feels, but she got so much out of just being left to explore and play by herself.
And yet the intricacies of that science — the precise mechanisms through which adrenal glands release glucocorticoids and immune cells send out cytokines — don't tell us much about how best to help children in trouble.
There is too much misinformation out there in the blog world that is not necessarily based on the actual science of laundry - just repeated.
You'll find out when the best time is to introduce food, the benefits of baby - led weaning over traditional pureed food, the best first foods and foods to avoid, the science of and how to deal with choking and gagging, introducing allergens, how much to feed, how to manage solid intake with breastfeeding and formula, and more!
Tinkerlab figured out how much salt needed to be added to make an egg float in this preschool science experiment.
«With the marketplace urging parents to buy all manner of things to make their babies «smart,» Gallagher's book offers parents a view based in science on how much babies really know and figure out on their own.
Now, Nancy wants to spread the joys of science to kids everywhere, giving them the tools they need to get started, activities that demonstrate how much fun science can be, and inspiration from people who have made careers out of loving science as much as she does!
Trying to figure out how much your baby should eat in the first year can sometimes feel like rocket science.
If you're not particularly into astrology, you probably haven't given the planet Jupiter much thought since you made a model of the solar system out of styrofoam balls for your elementary school science fair.
Furthermore, your usage of her quotation and name has made Brittany, myself, and the other administrators uncomfortable in many aspects, not the least of which being your attempts to discredit a single comment — used without context and with no scientific rational — while pandering to your «popular - science» tripe (much of which is woefully misconstrued, misused, or flat - out wrong).
We had so much fun reviewing the E-book from Preschool Powol Packets Blog and finding some Christmas science experiments to try out.
Now the science is in about what effects it will do to our air, our water, our way of life (job killing more than job creating) and if just one spill happens, how much money a town will have to dole out to clean up the mess?
Ken Sherrill, an out gay professor emeritus of political science at Hunter College, lauded Nixon's campaign launch, saying he is struck by «how much more polished she was as a candidate than Zephyr Teachout,» the Fordham law professor who four years ago challenged Cuomo from the left and captured 34 percent in the primary.
The social media site's news - filtering program shuts out some opposing points of view, but not as much as its users do on their own, researchers report online May 7 in Science.
But much of Western culture and science since the days of René Descartes, the 17th - century French polymath regarded as the father of modern philosophy, is based on the assumption that when we're being logical, we're cutting our emotions out of the loop.
But yesterday, the two sides came to an agreement on how much to spend on the earth sciences that allowed them to advance legislation sketching out a 2 - year vision for the space agency.
The bill also makes deep cuts in funding for the social sciences and spells out how much money NSF should allocate to each of its six research directorates.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z