I can use my «faith» to deny the «theory» of evolution even though there is as
much scientific data supporting evolution as there is supporting the «theory» of gravity.
Not exact matches
What's so sad is his willingness to completely ignore the reams of
scientific evidence,
data, knowledge, inference, etc. that very
much describes what was going on thousands or millions of years ago.
Peacocke finds a similarity of intention in religious and
scientific cosmologies: «Both attempt to take into account as
much of the «
data» of the observed universe as possible and both use criteria of simplicity, comprehensiveness, elegance, and plausibility....
the proof of Gods presence in us is not limited to the material or biological evolutionary development only, but most important
scientific proof is the effect of His will in historical development of the world.A computer program now used and tested a powerful machine by inputing all recorded events in history during the last hundreds years and found out that it has a purpose and not random.Meaning that an intelligent being could have influence it.It is now presumed by the religious observers that it could be His will.The process now is under improvement, because the computers is not powerl enough the deluge of information and
data since the beginning of history, some analyst believes that in them near future if the Quantum computers which is
much powerful than the present coventional will be used, then dramatic results and confirmation will be at hand.
But, to deny a
scientific fact which has been supported by just as
much evidence and
data as gravity or the germ theory is plain ignorance.
So there was no research because what would you research this decision was a emotional decision based on pure emotions and not
much if any
scientific data.
The intelligible principles of finality — traces of the Mind of the Creator — discerned through a holistic analysis of the
scientific data arejust as
much a part of the substantial reality of the cosmos as the matter itself.
But there isn't yet clear
scientific data that measures how
much of a difference Baby College makes in outcomes for children.
Providing the
scientific foundation and research
data, Dr. Ratey has been drafted into the groundswell of those whose mission it is to revitalize schools, combat the obesity crisis, stave off the encroaching epidemic of Sedentarism, by returning to evolutionary principles of physical exercise and proper diet thereby combating syndrome X, the underlying causation of
much chronic disease.
There's little
scientific data on toilet training in general,
much less on infant potty training.
The idea for this study was thus born out of necessity: what and how
much will happen to
scientific equipment when it is left unattended in the field while automatically collecting
data?
It's OK to state that, «The common belief that carbon dioxide is driving climate change is at odds with
much of the available
scientific data:
data from weather balloons and satellites, from ice core surveys, and from the historical temperature records» when this is clearly untrue.
DOE is often used in
scientific endeavors to measure and account for variations in
data, but not so
much in biology, said Muotri.
She said
much of the federal
scientific research and
data comes from multiple agencies working together, so cutting one will have a ripple effect.
«It's
much,
much easier to get automation involved in the
scientific process if you make
data open.»
It is noteworthy that the
much - cited
data on student enrollment and degrees, the supply side of the equation, say nothing about the demand for
scientific talent.
MUCH of the
scientific data necessary for environmental management in Europe is inadequate, according to the new European Environment Agency.
But because
scientific data often looks
much different from the
data used for animal photos and speech, developing the right artificial neural network can feel like an impossible guessing game for nonexperts.
As
much as the U.S.
scientific community may wish to view itself as a single garment of many diverse and colorful threads, an unflinching consideration of actual
data reminds us that our nation's biomedical research workforce remains nowhere near as rich as it could be.
Existing documents from the Seabed Explorations excavation suggest that
much vital
scientific data still lies on the sea floor.
When a Nobel prizewinner threatens to sue colleagues, and when they deny his access both to the regular means of
scientific publication and to the primary
data on the basis of which his findings have been refuted, there must be
much more going on besides matters of science.
Readers of
scientific articles can use this to find the
data they need in a
much more efficient way.»
Over the course of its lifetime, the probe sent back so
much data that there have already been 3,984
scientific papers published using Cassini
data, according to NASA.
As a result, STIS is
much more efficient at obtaining
scientific data than the earlier HST spectrographs.
«Genomics is becoming
much more
data - driven, which requires new approaches for
data management, storage and transfer and for overseeing the
scientific community's access to the
data,» Dr. Guyer said.
Data produced by the Scientific Cores, much of which is generated using samples provided by investigators, are uploaded into the CFG relational database, the primary vehicle for integrating data across platforms and for dissemination of data to investigators and to the scientific commun
Data produced by the
Scientific Cores, much of which is generated using samples provided by investigators, are uploaded into the CFG relational database, the primary vehicle for integrating data across platforms and for dissemination of data to investigators and to the scientific
Scientific Cores,
much of which is generated using samples provided by investigators, are uploaded into the CFG relational database, the primary vehicle for integrating
data across platforms and for dissemination of data to investigators and to the scientific commun
data across platforms and for dissemination of
data to investigators and to the scientific commun
data to investigators and to the
scientific scientific community.
Much more
scientific data is needed for both the short and long term on their application.
Data - driven analysis like you've done is
much more reliable and
scientific.
The most recent
scientific data reveals that moderate excess weight alone actually shortens a dog's life expectancy by as
much as 2 years.
Please, let's show at least this
much respect for the «
scientific method», as practiced in the physical sciences since the time of Sir Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes — in which a falsifiable hypothesis is tested against measurements of physical
data!
I just love the use of the word «deniers» to describe those of us who are not yet convinced that the
data we have supports the claims that the Earth is not flat,
much less the conclusions of the major
scientific academies and organizations.
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying
data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political «cause» rather than a balanced
scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that
much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and
data.
Dr. Ghassem R. Asrar, NASA's associate administrator for earth science, said Aqua's
data, combined with information gathered by the other satellites that are part of the agency's Earth Observing System, would help resolve
scientific conflicts about global warming and how
much of it could be attributed to human activity.
Warmest year, day or month is a political issue more than a
scientific issue or they wouldn't be picking favored
data sets or spending so
much time trying to eke out hundredths of degrees.
«Normal
scientific progress since 1998, including improvement of methods and
much more
data, suggests that the long - term variability is somewhat larger then previously thought.»
One day I started checking the facts and
data — first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that
much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any
scientific facts and measurements.
Okay here's what I will say: Anybody reading The New York Times, watching too
much mainstream news or posting «Now This» bullshit is probably just as ignorant of actual
scientific data as «deniers.»
JCH, The progress of
scientific understanding has
much in common with Bayesian approach to using empirical
data in building posterior likelihoods.
Or the authors are aware of the
data, but willfully mislead (which would be
much worse for an ostensibly
scientific organization).
Well MattB, when you see a group who push an ideology and couch it in
scientific terms this is different from a group who look at a
much broader field and try to ascertain what the
data is really supporting.
The location of
scientific bases heavily influences the distribution pattern of sample and observation
data, and the logistical supply routes are the focus of
much of the at - sea and pelagic work.
A problem with this theory is that
much of the criticism of man - made global warming theory is definitely not «anti-science», and seems to be based on careful consideration of the
scientific data.
Most experts in the Kilimanjaro debate accept three things: for more than a century, its ice has been in a retreat that is almost assuredly unstoppable and was not caused by humans; so far, there is scant
data on conditions there; and the main
scientific question now is how, and how
much, climate shifts driven by heat - trapping emissions are accelerating that trend.
If
scientific data is as
much as you say, their reference would help very
much the public discussion, provided absence of contradictory sources.
But let's see, vetted
scientific journal papers, they pretty
much all support the central points you will find therein, and the
data comes from leading science institutions and organizations, and those directly involved in the research, not some professor somewhere in Washington State who takes the
data and simply changes it and then it is dispersed to about 50 million people through 10,000 channels and quasi new ideological sites, and 10m comments on the Internet in various forms as new «truth.»
Again you may go back to
scientific papers of past decades when the issue of land based observations was studied by the scientists as there was not yet
much knowledge on the suitability of the available
data for calculating averages of the temperature change.
I can go back & check, but I'm pretty sure the last time I collected
data on this issue (probably 2009 or so), the connection between «
scientific consnesus» & «belief in climate change was
much much stronger.
I can go back & check, but I'm pretty sure the last time I collected
data on this issue (probably 2009 or so), the connection between «
scientific consensus» & «belief in climate change was
much much stronger.
With
much appreciated support from the experience of local guide, Ronal Aveoganna, and another USGS scientist, David Selkowitz, Arp and Jones gained insight into making such expeditions safe, successful, and a source of valuable
scientific data.
In other words,
much of the «overwhelming
scientific data» that supposedly proves that humans are causing climate change actually amounts to judgment calls, made by those groping in the dark for something that might not even exist.