Sentences with phrase «much scientific support»

It is widely promoted and sold as a weight loss and sports supplement, however, there does not appear to be much scientific support for this.

But the idea that anxiety is a major harm doesn't have much scientific support.

Not exact matches

It is arguably the best supported scientific theory of all time, much better understood than things like gravity.

And now we get to watch while Creationists imprison Nye in a tower until he recants his sacreligous talk much in the way Galileo was imprisoned by the Church for supporting the scientific theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun rather than the universe revolving around the Earth.

But, to deny a scientific fact which has been supported by just as much evidence and data as gravity or the germ theory is plain ignorance.

I can use my «faith» to deny the «theory» of evolution even though there is as much scientific data supporting evolution as there is supporting the «theory» of gravity.

There is much scientific evidence supporting that homosexuality as inherent and not choice.

No Ryan, I am sorry, but you will not find much support for the supernatural / magical elements of your Bronze Age belief in the scientific community.

The church is welcome not to support those scientific facts — much the way Galileo was excommunicated for daring to reorder the planets with Earth not at the center.]

Yet, my personal approach to parenting is a mix that goes well beyond the bits and pieces of these books that I found helpful — among the bits and pieces that I feel don't apply to my family but certainly they may apply to another family — and include bits and pieces of how I was raised, the lessons learned reflecting on years of parenting already behind me, thoughts from friends and family members, my instincts, the reality of unavoidable challenges, scientific studies, blogs and websites, parenting classes and support groups, teleseminars, conferences, and so much more.

But recent scientific studies are building a much stronger argument for the benefits of sharing sleep with our children.1 Yet even with the scientific support and the changing cultural perception of cosleeping, the subject is typically constrained to parents of infants.

New scientific research is supporting much of Steiner's work.

The Infant Feeding Support Resource Center also provides educational materials from industry experts ranging on a variety of topics, including formula comparison charts, scientific - based articles about prebiotics, and much more.

However, with the exception of one study conducted in 1986 (Hunziger and Barr 1986), there isn't much scientific evidence to support the idea.

Since then, much scientific research has focused on the presence of giant kelp and the range of biodiversity it supports.

Thanks to The Florence Gould Foundation's support and leadership of these Fellowships, the program has quickly become a highly sought after fellowship in the scientific community and has taken its place among the ranks of much older fellowships around the United States.

Federal funds also support virtually all research training and much of the academic training of those earning their Ph.D. «s in science and engineering and so train the personnel who staff, as well as create, America's scientific and engineering companies.

We believe that if we could all just go back to a diet that is more like our ancestors, we would be a much healthier nation and a growing body of scientific evidence supports that idea.

Research and scientific evidence supports this gut - brain connection and the separation that is possible through the consumption of beneficial bacteria; bone broth nourishes and heals the body, delivering much needed and most often depleted nutrients to support that connection.

These astounding results bring much needed scientific support to the AIP and its ability to help heal those with autoimmune disease.

You can also test your body's pH. Although a salivary test is a popular way to test pH it does not have much support in the scientific literature.

The most well - known test is a salivary pH test, however this method does not have much support in scientific studies.

Of course, we admittedly don't need much convincing, but it's always important for newcomers to see some of the tangible benefits of the lifestyle supported by cutting - edge scientific research.

Some are taking notice and beginning to publish studies, however, so the claim that coconut oil improving Alzheimer's lacks scientific support may not be true much longer.

To give you a taste of what is coming in Part 2, the arguments can be summarized as: 1) Education does not lend itself to a single «best» approach, so the Gates effort to use science to discover best practices is unable to yield much productive fruit; 2) As a result, the Gates folks have mostly been falsely invoking science to advance practices and policies they prefer for which they have no scientific support; 3) Attempting to impose particular practices on the nation's education system is generating more political resistance than even the Gates Foundation can overcome, despite their focus on political influence and their devotion of significant resources to that effort; 4) The scale of the political effort required by the Gates strategy of imposing «best» practices is forcing Gates to expand its staffing to levels where it is being paralyzed by its own administrative bloat; and 5) The false invocation of science as a political tool to advance policies and practices not actually supported by scientific evidence is producing intellectual corruption among the staff and researchers associated with Gates, which will undermine their long - term credibility and influence.

I can supply any number of citations to correct your misunderstandings — as to why Marzluff's work does not support TNR at all, why coyotes are better for birds than cats, and much more — but nearly every TNR supporter with whom I've conversed has been too blinded by their emotional attachment to feral cats to accept scientific reality....

As a practicing veterinarian, I appreciate that the guidelines are much more than words on paper; they provide scientific support for the life - saving recommendations I make every day.

«Ceva knows the importance of supporting industry organizations that do so much to advance scientific progress and educate the veterinarian community and the public on heartworm disease and prevention,» Wallace says.

Carl Sagan did not receive much support form the scientific community at large when he suggested there must be extra solar planets.

By the time the effects of AGCC are so obvious that they visibly support its already undeniably high degree of scientific certainty, it will be too late to do much to stop AGCC's worst effects.

The Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation has given away more than $ 400 million, much of it to support water and other sustainability initiatives and scientific research.

Whether or not there was some burgeoning of numbers over all, as has sometimes been portrayed, is much less clear and not really supported by scientific information.

I just love the use of the word «deniers» to describe those of us who are not yet convinced that the data we have supports the claims that the Earth is not flat, much less the conclusions of the major scientific academies and organizations.

He could certainly earn much more money by working on other scientific topics or by identifying himself as supporting the notion of a human - caused global warming crisis.

One day I started checking the facts and data — first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements.

«How the Democratic Party Has Incurred Major Electoral Losses by Its Mistaken Support for Climate Alarmism Climate Alarmism Is a Typical Scientific Scam but with Much More Serious Consequences»

When the range of knowledge is restricted to that, where scientific research has been done widely enough to compare results and reviews supported by such comparisons are possible, it's possible to reach and document a sufficient level of objectivity (this would leave out much of WG2 and WG3).

Well MattB, when you see a group who push an ideology and couch it in scientific terms this is different from a group who look at a much broader field and try to ascertain what the data is really supporting.

And on climate science, if he had been willing to devote even a few sentences to holding his ground he could have done much to support a science community that is besieged by an aggressive political disinformation campaign, and could have struck a blow for scientific integrity in policymaking — but he didn't.

Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful action on climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on climate change will depend heavily on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix of options, with some actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against climate risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.

Sadly, if this article had been written with some (or maybe even any) supporting evidence for these highly entertaining but somewhat wild conclusions, it would probably make as much impact within the scientific world as the IPCC's latest report is making now.

As much as the liberal media, liberal academics and pundits tell Americans that the earth is too warm and human beings are the cause for a spike in weather and temperature changes, there is little - to - no scientific consensus to support these assertions....

But let's see, vetted scientific journal papers, they pretty much all support the central points you will find therein, and the data comes from leading science institutions and organizations, and those directly involved in the research, not some professor somewhere in Washington State who takes the data and simply changes it and then it is dispersed to about 50 million people through 10,000 channels and quasi new ideological sites, and 10m comments on the Internet in various forms as new «truth.»

As well as the cost of the research itself, the physical problems of mounting a scientific campaign in one of the most remote places in Antarctica could cost as much again in logistical support.

Pulling out theories that aren't supported by the evidence is not what a scientific report should care much about, for good reason.

In the case of the earlier Royal Society statement, in my judgment the statement was as much political (in support of the UK Government's mitigation policies) as it was scientific.

With much appreciated support from the experience of local guide, Ronal Aveoganna, and another USGS scientist, David Selkowitz, Arp and Jones gained insight into making such expeditions safe, successful, and a source of valuable scientific data.

The takeaway of the piece - that the need for emissions reductions is «less urgent» than policymakers assume — is not even supported by her own study, much less the scientific mainstream.

The fact is that the HS didn't do much for environmentalism anyway — environmental politics remained the sport of the establishment, because it failed to find popular support; and scientific certainty was not needed for the creation of political institutions prior to the HS.

The question then becomes how much insurance and what kind, and here I think the skeptics are especially useful in challenging what's mistakenly called «the scientific consensus»: that if you believe global warming is a risk, you should be supporting drastic cuts in carbon emissions and expanded versions of the Kyoto Protocol.