Their studies were the basis of much of the austerity movement in Europe and the US, based on their claim that debt - to - GDP ratios over 90 % are linked to
much slower economic growth.
Not exact matches
The Great Stagnation: In «Why the global economy may be doomed to lower
growth — maybe forever,» Simone Foxman gives four reasons why
economic growth may be
much slower in the future: scarce resources, an aging labour force, stagnant technology
growth and externalities from climate change.
Federal spending cuts scheduled to begin next week would
slow economic growth in the next year, though not nearly as
much as going over the fiscal cliff might have, economists say.
In January the International Monetary Fund said China's
economic growth would top 6.6 percent in 2018, but it could now drop by as
much as 0.5 percent if these tariffs are imposed — and it could
slow even further if a global trade war truly heats up.
The Fed and other central banks want to increase interest rates to
slow down and control
economic growth to prevent the economy from overheating too
much.
Nominal
economic growth would have to
slow very dramatically over the balance of the year —
much more than assumed in the November 2012 Update.
Of course it matters to anyone who wants to understand the
economic cost of the adjustment, but arguments about whether the reported data are overstated, and by how
much, have become part of the bull vs bear debate about whether Chinese
growth is merely
slowing temporarily, and not as part of a major
economic reversal of the
growth model.
China's
economic growth rate might
slow a little, but this is simply the consequence of China's having gotten
much closer to the capital frontier, in which case a lower return on investment should be accepted.
Indeed, tax reform that
slows economic growth by adding too
much to debt can actually cost more once
economic effects are incorporated.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has published very robust research involving more than 140 countries around the world which demonstrates that countries with extreme levels of inequality (1) tend to experience
much slower rates of
economic growth; and (2) are far more susceptible to the kind of severe financial / banking / credit crisis that America just went through five years ago.
«The World Bank figures are there for all to see, our
economic growth rate today is at a
much slower pace than it was 3 years back, agreed that the present government is doing a good job at diversifying the economy.»
«Corruption inhibits free enterprise and
slows economic growth, and it is compromising the quality of
much needed services that safeguards health, creates opportunity and save lives.
I realize that
much has changed in the last few years — widespread
economic hardship, cuts in state aid by both Democratic and Republican state governments,
much slower than anticipated
growth in property values,, the opportunity to cut staff compensation under the threat of union busting, dramatic cuts to the revenue limit base — but despite all of these changes, if you go back to the principles and the details of Partnership Plan used to sell the 2008 Operating Referendum (which passed overwhelmingly) I think you can find plenty of justification for increasing property taxes in order to achieve the mission of the district.
I've been away for the past couple of months, but even if I hadn't been there wasn't
much to write about; the equity markets have continued their
slow climb despite lackluster US
economic growth.
To avoid one of the biggest downsides of a carbon tax —
slower economic growth — as
much as 50 percent of the revenue should be used to lower corporate tax rates for all companies.
Click here to view the most recent Carbon Emissions Indicator and Data Though
economic growth slowed throughout
much of the world during 2001, world carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels continued their relentless upward trend, surpassing 6.5 billion tons.
The IEA predicted in its draft report, due to be published next month, that demand would be damped, «reflecting the impact of
much higher oil prices and slightly
slower economic growth».
That general opinion may be summed up as follows: Restricting emissions would
slow economic growth — but not by
much.