Sentences with phrase «much smaller gas»

NGC 3359 appears to be devouring a much smaller gas rich dwarf galaxy, nicknamed the Little Cub, which contains 10,000 times fewer stars than its larger companion.

Not exact matches

Greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation industry currently total about as much as those of Germany, not a small amount, and experts say that sum will grow as the world becomes even more mobile.

As much as we love staying local during the summer months, it is so wonderful to have an abundance of small costal towns just a tank of gas away.

Nasal aspirator - yes, we use the kind you can suck the air through Baby fingernail clippers - yes, we used the cheap ones and they are great and just small enough to be helpful Video monitor - NA Audio monitor - yes, made me feel much more comfortable when he started sleeping in his own room Gas drops - yes, couldn't have done newborn without them - he was so incredibly gassy and they seemed to help.

Planets revealed to be small and heavy must be made mostly of rock or metal whereas worlds seen to be large and light must possess much more gas.

In addition, the researchers checked the respiration of soil microorganisms by excluding plant roots with a metal ring in small soil areas and then measuring how much CO2 was released from the soil with a gas analyser.

Because this implosive collapse is dominated by the inertia of the liquid surrounding the bubble, and there is little stiffness supplied by the condensing vapor (only the small amount of residual gas contained within the bubble), the energy density can become much larger than that originally present in the sound field itself.

The researchers argue that the deadly gases of the Siberian eruption killed vegetation across the globe, just as much smaller modern eruptions have produced acid rain and other plant - killing phenomena.

The trials revealed different levels of fibre in a diet affected both how much gas was produced and where it was concentrated in the gut — in the stomach, small intestine or large intestine.

Dwarf galaxies are too small to suck in much star - making gas.

In the Solar System, small rocky planets such as the Earth orbit near the Sun, whereas gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn are found much further out.

Some young stars form inside a small rotating disk of dust and gas, whereas others coalesce inside a much larger rotating disk, called a protoplanetary disk.

While this represents a much smaller percentage of overall greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide, methane is about 20 times more effective at trapping heat.

Each OCO - 2 reading will sample a column of the atmosphere above roughly 3 square kilometers of Earth's surface — much smaller than the 85 - square - kilometer footprint of a similar Japanese probe, the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), which launched in 2009 and is still operating.

The level of star formation is much smaller because interstellar gas and dust has been reduced during earlier stages of the collision.

Based on the new observations of CO, the astronomers concluded that IC 10 has much less molecular gas than previously thought and apparently has a much smaller percentage of molecular gas than our Milky Way.

A less active sun would probably have a small cooling effect on earth's temperature, if man - made greenhouse gases weren't having a much bigger warming influence.

Most of these potential planets appear to be much smaller than gas giants (like Jupiter and Saturn).

Such planets are much harder to see than young gas giants because of their much smaller sizes.

Of course air is only part of it but, if you find yourself puffing up from too much trapped gas, munching on a small handful of caraway seeds straight, or caraway crackers if the taste is too strong, might help.

The rest — sorbitol, maltitol, and mannitol — are cheaper to produce and won't affect blood sugar, but they're much more likely to cause bloating and gas in smaller doses.

I think a reason why overfilling a piston engine mightn't be as bad as overfilling a wankel engine is that in a piston engine there is a much larger distance between where crank is whipping up oil and the vents which are often both in the head, where as a rotary engine seems to have much smaller volume (timing gear inside of the rotor) where extra oil can be whipped around with blow - by gasses furiously blowing by.

That may sound shallow considering that natural gas could play a role in gaining energy independence (from what I understand it's a mixed bag environmentally as much of the stuff is locked in oil shale) but Honda is a small company that needs to focus its limited resources.

Small gas tank and far less than advertised mileage keeps you in the gas station way too much.

Interesting features of this model are available with a powerful gas V8 or modern diesel, luxurious, reliable, safe, and stylish., and As nimble as a much smaller vehicle CONTACT US AND WE WILL SEND YOU A FREE CARFAX REPORT.

Other small annoyances include the bulky, overhand - grip parking brake that likes to run interference for the center armrest, as well as the digital fuel range arrow that can be mistaken for the gas flap indicator — admittedly only an issue for those who don't drive their car much or have really bad memory.

In short, for much less money, one could have a vehicle only a little smaller than the «now big» Gran Fury, with similar performance and interior space but considerably better gas mileage — indeed, for many, gas mileage would double with the move to the «four bangers.»

It does not require much gas, due to its small size.

Among minivans, only Mazda 5 gets better gas mileage (21/27 mpg), but Mazda 5 is a much smaller vehicle.

A straight six typically had enough low - end torque to get a heavy load moving, and its generally low - revving nature helped it get decent mileage, although the small - V8 option usually didn't use that much more gas.

The battery pack in the Malibu Hybrid is much, much smaller, because it relies on the gas engine often for primary power, rather than just electricity - generation like the Volt.

If I could go back in time, I would NOT buy the Mazda cx5, consumes too much gas, the rear seats are too small and basic

Gas mileage seems pretty good for a small SUV (Very small) Bad: Fit and finish Seating position is hard short Seats The telescoping steering wheel is worthless it rattles You can't see out of it, and the parking sensors indicate you are too close at nearly 2ft from something It's slow (The Volt feels like a corvette in comparison) It's expensive (There are a lot of MUCH better options for less) Due to it's shape you can't get anything in the hatch area Controls aren't well laid out..

The Rogue is small and peppy enough to get you around big cities without being too big or using too much gas.

The Fusion Hybrid, which beats even the much smaller Honda Civic hybrid by 1 mpg in city driving, can travel more than 700 miles on a single tank of gas.

If you're looking for ways to reduce how much water, electricity or gas your household uses, you might be surprised at the difference just a few small changes can make.

Keep in mind that too much broccoli and cauliflower, particularly raw, can cause gas so keep those portions small!

Now the barren feel of the buildings and cities and small gas stations reminded me of the level of Half Life where you drive along the coast, it felt much like that, barren quiet and just something odd which was great but when going into buildings and there isn't anything in these buildings but a water in the corner or not that much detail in the buildings like throw about office supplies or papers everywhere you know very intense detail it pulled away from the experience.

But if such a biofuel is grown and manufactured without much fossil - based energy, if it doesn't come from fields or forests (Mr. Charles stressed there is no palm oil involved), this might be the first hint that aviation — still a small fraction of the overall greenhouse - gas pie, but one of the fastest - growing wedges — could avoid adding greatly to the climate challenge while subtracting just a little bit from the world's energy challenge.

Request for clarification from a retired engineer: when it's said that methane is N times the greenhouse gas that CO2 is, is that purely taking into account their absorption spectra relative to the blackbody emission from the surface, or does it take into account saturation as well, since methane constitutes a much smaller percentage wrt CO2?

The study, by researchers at the University of Texas and URS, a consulting firm — with the cooperation of (and some funding from) the oil and gas industry and Environmental Defense Fund (more on that below)-- shows that much of the pollution problem lies in a small subset of poorly operating systems or faulty processes — in this case valves run pneumatically using the pressure of extracted gas and operations that clear liquids from older wells.

Even though the buildup of leaves and the lack of forest upkeep has a small part in the fires the build up of greenhouse gases has much more to do with the fires.

Yes, people can complain that cities, but the per capita contribution to greenhouse gases and other environmental stresses is much smaller due to public transportation, smaller living spaces, and having goods and services often available within walking distance.

A huge laser delivers a large amount of energy in a short time to heat the walls of the larger chamber, and the radiation emitted from those walls in turn drives the small capsule to a very small size, increasing the density of the gases inside to much higher density than lead and heating it at the same time to very high temperatures required for fusion to occur.

The proportion of forcing to CO2 amount eventually becomes linear as the amount of CO2 goes to zero — this is nothing special; any continuous smooth function can be approximated by a straight line over a sufficiently short interval; adding a sufficiently small amount of any greenhouse gas will have about half the effect as adding twice as much.

Global - scale variations are therefore much smaller, and they reflect changes in global climate drivers, for example in greenhouse gas concentrations or in solar activity.

I'd summarize Lou's main point as being that it's meaningless to sound off about how much more «potent» a greenhouse gas methane (natural gas) may be, compared to CO2, unless you also take into account how small methane emissions are relative to CO2.

In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balance.

In addition, a combined analysis of the response at the surface and through the depth of the atmosphere using HadCM3 and the solar reconstruction of Lean et al. (1995) concluded that the near - surface temperature response to solar forcing over 1960 to 1999 is much smaller than the response to greenhouse gases (Jones et al., 2003).

That figure may well be much smaller by the time of the next election, because the market value of some of the major companies has been falling rapidly, and the value of their coal, oil and gas fired power stations is falling even faster.