Sentences with phrase «much space then»

If you love to cook and entertain but don't like a big table taking up so much space then consider these space saving alternatives.

Not exact matches

The point is that the single most important job any CEO of a growing company can perform is identifying the constraints that are keeping the organization from sprinting forward in the right direction and then allocating as much of their time as needed to remove them, thus freeing up space for the organization to perform more effectively.

(On a related note, we will then see much more Uberization of office space.)

Small businesses need a workspace that has just as much character as they do; if the space you're officing in is progressive, vibrant, and connective, then the company culture you're striving to create will gradually start to reflect that.

If earnings on Wall Street are not recycled in the economy at large, then markets are going to shrink, there's not going to be much of a rental income for commercial space, and with shrinking markets you're not going to have companies earning more profit on investment, even if they're holding down wages.

On the other hand, of the earth were slightly larger, gravity would be stronger and then the light gas of hydrogen (much lighter than air) would not disperse into space at its now prescribed rate, eventually resulting in the earth being unable to sustain life.

Then one question to ask is «how much energy is there in space?»

Figure out how many square feet the cross takes up, then figure how much space is left in which no religious symbols are displayed.

It's much smaller than the Magimix as it's designed to be a personal blender, but if you're only using your blender to make morning smoothies for one then this is the perfect option, as it's a little cheaper than the Magimix and takes up way less space.

The filling takes up so much space on the bottom of the cupcake liner that there is the tendency to overfill the liners and then the cake will fluff up a little too high.

If I'd had a grill grate with less space between the grates, then this may not have been as much of a problem.

we have no cover for CB at all then, Chambers needs to sit on the bench and be healthy for covering RB and CB as much as i want to see what hes like as a DM its too high of a risk to play him there atm, I'd def go for bellerin for RB though hes so fast and has tremendous technical ability, One person i think wenger should of taken to dortmund is diaby just incase hes needed would be nice for diaby to get a good 60 min game but i do nt think hes ready for CL just yet since he hasnt even featured in the PL yet but then again no harm in taking him since hes been linking up with bellerin pretty well in the U21's we must remember we have some really good youngsters in the squad than can fill in some of the spaces.

UMBC head coach Ryan Odom: We continued to get stops, and then all of a sudden we began to run much better than we did in the first half and our spacing was tremendous and we were able to get some shots off in transition that would not normally happen had we not been able to get a stop.

It then allows for Monreal and Bellerin to push up and pretty much play as wingers if we're having longer periods of pressure, giving our attacks plenty of width abd then Sanchez, Ozil and Theo can roam and push in centrally for combinations with Ramsey hitting space with those late runs he's so good at.

Santi should stay central.With Beilek not expected to make much appearances and Rosicky and arteta less, then we have space to sign a quality dm if coqulan isn't seen as a starter.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

if you watch arsenal place I see so much space and no runs no runs at all only when in the box if you watch Leicester they are always makeing runs all over the place that's how you score goals against a team like Southampton they controlled the game it was not unlucky just like chelsea can do control the game and won arsenal players don't believe they can win the title the players in that team play without heart you know why because Im sure wenger tells them becareful we don't need anymore Injurys what kind of mentality is that also I will pick out Ramsey he is playing like a player who is leaveing the club he and flamini just don't work Ramsey is not playing good at all wenger can blame make excuses but truth is he is the manager he make the tactics and he gets it wrong all the time giroud has no pace none bench him against some teams and play pure pace make runs ox Walcott but they don't Walcott has lost it his pace has gone its clear or he fears I jury how if a player is fit put your all in forget injury if you get Injured then so be it but if your fit and your Walcott run put yourself about wenger should leave because he.

Sure wenger was at the game with the wrong team sheet we had no width with no one running into space very static with not much creativity and then when they did they all were well off target

We then get a goal back ahead after giving them far too much space for a bit.

The Houston Texans are a space filler only, The Oakland Raiders are a much better, much more focused team then the Texans have / ever been...

Offering that much space against Arsenal and our team not taking chances, then you can criticize the team.

If Giroud starts then I will bet that Chelsea will play a higher def line until they can get a goal and squash out the space for our game changers to make much of an impact, how - ever I feel more confident that Theo will at least cause Chelsea to defend deeper and as such, force Chelsea to play with gaps between their def and mid or play a LOT of players behind the ball and try to hit us on the counter.

OG then further congests that space bc he does nt move around much.

I think it would be a mistake to focus too much on the little Spaniard, because then we would be leaving too much space for the likes of Nasri, Fernandinho, Lampard or Navas and they all have the ability to really hurt us.

«We played much better in the second half and used the space of the pitch, we let them run and then got the second goal.

If the centre backs have to come forward to deal with him then there's so much space in behind, so I thought Mile was fantastic.»

Hence, it is important that there isn't much gap between the midfielders and defenders as it will then give too much space for the opposition attackers to target Spurs» back - four, particularly if they play with three attackers (like West Ham).

Charlie Daniels shouldn't have been given so much space on the left, shouldn't have been allowed to cut - in so easily and then shouldn't have scored at the near post.

In the 67th minute Defoe's crafty flick created space for Emmanuel Adebayor who failed in taking any advantage of it much to the despair of Spurs manager who then substituted the disappointing striker for Clint Dempsey.

Then again, with 20 teams hoarding max - level cap space almost by accident, it might not cost much to deal quality players such as Bogut and Livingston into unused salary slots.

In terms of pressing and counter-attacking this formation could work, as the forwards are already in an advanced position, but if the full backs are pushing up to provide the width that is required by Klopp, then the defence would be compromised as there would be far too much space for the opposition to exploit.

I can commit to shorter showers, but I have long, thick, super curly hair, I (literally) could not get all of my hair wet in less than 3 minutes, much less lathered, rinsed, and conditioned, and then there's actually bathing, another 3 - 5 minutes (I happen to have a small shower, I could not possibly extend my arms even halfway standing in the middle, which believe it or not, adds time to my shower, trying to maneuver in a tiny space) I will commit to trying to get my time down below 30 minutes, though.

Then it was just a matter of getting out the things that could be better stored elsewhere (oh, those bee boxes were taking up so much space - much better stored in the barn), and making space for what I do want to do in here.

If you are looking for a lifesaving baby swing that you can use everyday for your baby and that will not take up much space, then this is it.

This carrier also comes with built - in weather sheltering, but it also features so much more If you buy this baby carrier then you can expect: lots of padding for your comfort and your baby's comfort; a good amount of storage space; stirrups for your child's feet; and a choice of colors (black, ivy green or seaside blue).

Then you can navigate and explore with the group without taking up too much space.

If having a much larger bottle sterilizer would help you in your daily tasks, then it will help when you purchase a bottle sterilizer that has the space for it.

If you have a child that loves all things baby as much as I do, and you have a small space, then these products are for you.

Some considerations: if space is tight, remember that using a standard crib and then buying a twin size bed may make much more sense than a convertible that morphs into a full size bed (full size beds are 15» wider than a twin).

If you have a patio and enjoy spending time outside, then chances are you want to get as much use from your outdoor space as possible.

If you are planning to fold and unfold the high chair a couple of times a day to save as much space as you can, then choosing a light one will save your back.

These tools sorted through as much content produced for the social space as possible and then aggregated it into some meaningful format for our consumption.

Think about what and how much you want to clean then decide how much space you need.

This process is much like tiling a floor in accordance with a specific pattern: once the pattern is chosen and the first tiles are placed, then all the other tiles must go in predetermined spaces in order to maintain the pattern of symmetry.

The preferential escape of lighter hydrogen over time would then lead to a skewed ratio of H2O to HDO on Mars, indicative of how much water has escaped into space.

Our nation's space program survived that gap, but the environment was much different then.

«If you look at Earth from space, the distribution of continents and oceans will then look much the same, even though life, the climate and sea level may have dramatically changed.

The Hubble space telescope launched all the way back in April 24, 1990, and since then, it's done so much for the field of astronomy...

However, now that adaptive optics is beginning to give very good results, then there are some wavelength regions where things can be done from the ground probably with a much cheaper experiment than you would be able to do from space or for the same amount of money with much bigger telescopes.

If you live in a bungalow, this shouldn't be much of your concern, but if you are living in a regular apartment, then spacing is on your priority list.