Sentences with phrase «much strength there»

Periodograms show how much strength there is...

Not exact matches

Cooper, one of the first journalists on the ground after the massive earthquake that reduced much of Haiti's capital of Port - Au - Prince to rubble, on Thursday night detailed harrowing feats of humanity and strength he witnessed there.

There is simply too much for most people to handle alone, so focus your attention on areas where you already have expertise and play to your strengths.

There's so much you do have, and it's not just things; you also have experiences, family and friends, memories, pockets of happy moments, laughter your shared with someone, your personal strengths, your skills and talents, and you most likely also have a reasonable amount of knowledge about the world and how it works.

And while there's much to be gained from a focus on the popular averages, the strength of a market move is determined by the underlying strength of the market as a whole.

Perhaps you're thinking that if you simply do short - term trading stocks and ETFs with the most relative strength to the major indices, there's not much of a concern to worry about market timing because these stocks will outperform.

Though Iceland is said to be recovering very well from its financial crisis, there is an inflating housing bubble that is lurking behind the scenes that is helping to lend much - needed strength to the country's banking system and consumer spending.

Part of the strength of biblical poetry is its parsimony in the use of emotive adjectives, and to my taste there is altogether too much adjectival insistence in the ICEL versions.

Also, for what it is worth (probably not much since you seem pretty set in your views), there are many who would argue that God does not intervene in every single trying moment in one's life, but rather gives you the strength to do your best to overcome obstacles.

Praying for strength and boldness in bringing the light of the gospel to a country where there is much darkness.

does anyone think the reports of us getting psg's youngster rabiot are true and if yes is he what we need atm i guessing as he is a big lad he's probably diaby long term replacement i have seen a picture of him and he doesn't look like a very strong build but i am sure a year in the gym will sort that out he would add much needed height to our midfield and he doesn't seem to be a injury prone as diaby he has a good general skill set am sure wenger can convince him with plenty of game time any young french player knows wengers rep with youngsters he should jump at the chance to work with wenger NOW with a bit of strength work he could be a handy d / m also if wenger could mould him to play there,

manure we're very under strength much like us vs lens and dortmund were already into there pres season.

In Conclusion — you are biased against Theo in the sense you've already decided he is not a CF.. There are problems to his game — it does limit us tactically BUT as proven yesterday we can actually play to those strengths quite nicely thank you very much.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Arsenal are guaranteed to play a second string side, but so are our opponents and this season we seem to have much more strength in depth than usual so there is no reason why we can not go all the way this time around.

Now I think there is still reasons to be cheerful, I agree Man C & Chelski have spent & bought some good players, we all understand that 5 of those teams might be in the CL proper which is a huge distraction for those 4 - 5 teams.Chelsea will not be able to field the same 13 - 14 players all season, as for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the race.

Size, speed, and strength can not be taught, but there is much more to a great athlete than just raw talent and measurables.

It would be worth a try because Coq is a real DM who might be able to support Ozil who could then function a bit like Santi did and we all know how much we miss a Santi and there is no doubt that Ozil's skill set comes closest to Santi in terms of passing and strength on the ball.

If there's anything the 2017 season has taught us, it's not to try to be clever about schedule and opponent strength so much in advance... Honestly: who would have thought this time last year that our tough games would be vCHI and @JAX, and games like @CIN, @OAK and @GB would be easy cruising?

I understand what your saying but Ozil is no Bergkamp he doesn't have the aggression strength and nasty streak that Dennis had and he doesn't obviously have the finishing ability of Dennis in the 10 role Ozil is a nice tidy player who coasts through games and has great vision and an eye for a pass but there isn't much else to his game in my opinion defensively he is really poor although our team as a whole collectively are at times.

Not worried on either front... Arteta if fit can provide rest for some of midfield and while Monreal has improved a lot he is not a powerful defender backs off far too much and lacks Ariel strength... plenty of better left backs out there to strengthen that side of defence... so Viello kondogbia and Rodriguez / darmian would do me for summer signings... Sell poldi Ryo Campbell no goals flamini etc bring on some of youngsters...

mate u have to wait because there is only one striker who mixes the strength aerial ability and holdup of giroud, movement speed and dedication of Theo also he has technicality of someone like Suarez and we will face him on Tuesday I hope we beat Bayern in both games and again at some point in current UCL (once if we get through our group) then he might consider joining us other than him no one is there WO can offer so much

This suggests that they either lack the mental strength to play under pressure or there is an issue within the squad in that the players are much of a sameness — Wenger seems to have moved towards a certain type of player whereas before when he first came to the club we had strong, physical leaders such as Vieira and Keown and smaller, technical players like Overmars and Anelka.

It's obviously a strength when Giroud is in, not so much when Walcott is in — but there are different strengths that come along with that.

There's no hiding the fact that Villa are very much a counter-attacking team and playing to their strengths on Saturday could well be the key to picking off a Norwich side that will be keen to impress in front of their passionate home fans.

There's now a gap up front for the visitors, who don't have that much strength in depth in attack.

Daniele De Rossi, the nearest thing to roy keane out there and would add much needed strength to the youngsters.

Whilst centre - backs and defensive midfielders are probably the first players that spring to mind when you think of strength and endurance, there are a number of smaller — much lighter — attacking players who aren't afraid of a tussle.

not Liverpool, and we sacrificed the CL top rank place for that.The pbm here now is: do u guys have any solution for the current issue?give some if you do.If u think u really love the club that much, then I think the best and the first responsability u have to take is to figure out what is actually going wrong and what is the solution.Otherways there is no point to criticise each other here at all.All of these guys all love the club, thts why they spend their time writtin here.OUR TEAM DOES NT EVEN HAVE THE WILLING TO FIGHT AND WIN, NO FIRE, IT SEEMS LIKE THEY ARE ALL TIRED OR LAZY ON THE PITCH.Thats the pbm here bro!!!! And we know that we have all the technical needs and the talent to carry with that.All we need to do is to make effort and fight with strength to be able to apply and show all of those talents and skills on the pitch.We know its not easy, but thats the main reason that players are out there.No team is gonna let you just do what you want on pitch.

Strengths: Lots of bells and whistles for the toddler who needs a little more va - voom in their potty training; has an off - button so there is a remedy if this seat drives you completely insane (which it pretty much will).

While I understand the instinct to regard the strength of two party politics of 1950 - 51, or the broader 1945 - 70 period, as the natural order of things, there is as much or more reason to think that the type of more pluralist party system which has arisen since 1974 (despite the systemic barriers to it) is here to say and the idea that any 3 + party system is always a death match to find out which the two «real» parties will be is somewhat ahistoric and unlikely.

However, despite the popularity of this opinion, it is of considerable significance to state that, apart from the youths non-possession of the financial strength to execute the electoral projects as being speculated in some quarters, there are of cause other probable factors that may render the move fruitless irrespective of the demographic advantage enjoyed or the glamour that graced their much celebrated not - too - young - to run campaign recently embarked on to press for power shift.

There's an indicator light and an alarm that let you monitor the drone's signal strength and how much battery power is left.

In other words, there could be a signal from greenhouse gas forcing in the last century, but because ENSO strength has varied so much in the past, such a signal is still not clear above the natural noise.

What is difficult to know, is how much change there was between e.g. the LIA and current solar strength, as we only have accurate measurements since the satellite age.

There is still so much work to be done, but I look forward to meeting the challenges ahead together, with strength and ingenuity.

Don't get us wrong, the bench press is a great tool in your training arsenal to achieve overall chest aesthetics and strength, but there are some cons to it, like placing too much of a burden on your delts, which can increase the risk of injury for people with poor shoulder mobility.

Now there must have been thirty people back there watching, there were odd whispers, people asking others how much it is, and others simply astonished that this silent giant possessed such strength.

There are no comparative numbers so you can only measure how much you improve, but McArdle says core strength is an essential indicator of overall fitness.

Of course, there will be some changes... for example, if you're eating for muscle gain, you might not experience much fat loss, but you'll hit strength and performance before the muscle starts to come.

If you aren't dieting too aggressively, there shouldn't be much strength loss given you're eating sufficient protein and still lifting in a similar fashion to what you were before the diet.

I have been wondering if maybe it's too much cardio, there is a lot of strength, but I just don't know.

We know carbs are important for strength training, but there isn't much evidence on what an «optimal» carb intake is for strength athletes.

While this is very rarely the goal with weight training, there ARE people who actually DO want to reduce the size of a specific muscle or muscles (but without just stopping training and losing too much strength).

While the evidence does support the belief that taking adequate protein increases strength, there does not seem to be much evidence that increasing protein will lead to huge gains in strength and power.

Incidentally, in this issue of the magazine, on page 20, there is another short piece by Ben Bruno called, «Curl More Weight, Increase Your Strength Immediately» that pretty much covers the same principle of Radiant Tension.

There are much better ways to build this armor that develops tremendous core strength, avoids injury, and gets ripped abs in the fastest time frame possible!

If he or she wishes to improve bone density, back strength, or improve weak hamstrings, he or she is FAR better served engaging in a carefully designed weight training program incorporating a deadlift variation or two - there is less chance for injury, a much shorter learning curve, and quite frankly he or she will be less physically devastated after a few sets of deadlifts than after moving a tractor tire back and forth across a parking lot.

Said no powerlifter, ever,) not to mention that fundamentally strength and endurance athletes tend to not have much in common, other than arguments over whether or not a squat suit and Chuck Taylors look any more or less ridiculous than men's neon booty shorts and black and yellow Kayanos.But there are plenty of reasons that some of you strength focused folks may be interested in distance running (which will be the example for cardio I'm using in this article).

The arm that's way out there on the finger tips, can help you a little with strength and balance... but not much.