Sentences with phrase «much teaches what»

Not exact matches

But I've had to teach myself much of what I know.

It's taught me so much about what it means to be a leader.»

You go through so much training in the military, but from that first year as a plebe, what the military is teaching you is how to be resilient.

But Corbo found that when reps were out of the loop of what Manco was trying to teach back at headquarters, some made bad decisions, such as loading retail customers with too much inventory.

My goal in this article is to teach you, much like I taught that company, how to identify whether or not your website has been negatively impacted from a Google penalty and what steps you can take to recover.

Much of his teaching on marriage for spouses is fairly simple, similar to what one would expect from a local parish pastor.

Those who take part in simulated surgical training, for example, retain as much as 80 % of what they learned a year later, compared to 20 % among people who are taught in traditional ways.

«I recognized the madness for what it was much sooner... and so that taught me that markets can reverse and just go down.»

According to Lawrence Summers, former director of President Barack Obama's National Economic Council and former U.S. Treasury Secretary — he is also President Emeritus of Harvard University at the top of a shortlist of potential candidates to replace current chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke — the events of the last few years have thrown into question much of what he learned and taught about coherent economic models.

It's truly a learning curve, but each step has taught me so much about myself and what I'm capable of.

I would very much like to do this strategy and I saw that in your blog you have other articles on links bild, I'll take a look, because your tips seem very interesting to practice, I will understand what you are teaching.

Having spent much of the past decade teaching lawyers around the world to manage their projects, I've come «round to a different — and I believe clearer — way to frame that definitional issue: What does success look like?

«Jack can teach anyone how to be more successful and much happier doing what they love to do.»

Our clients receive for their fee much of what many advisors have been taught to give away for free in the past in the hope of obtaining the sale.

Honestly, I had to drop so much doctrinal baggage to find the truth behind most of what I was taught in Conservative churches (and I am still casting off theologies that were biased).

When Piers Morgan asks how much Kim is worth, she says, «Whatever it is, I give 10 % away to the church and that's what I was taught.

That is a religion that teaches not what the Bible says but what they decide is appropriate given our «much more evolved and smarter human condition» these days.

I am grateful that God allowed me to witness t his loving expression, it taught me so much about how to continue living my own life and what I MUST teach my children.

Many religious people I have talked to don't even know much about their faith, only what they are taught by rote.

Much of it is the exact opposite of what we were taught.

Firstly, I believe that we can never hear too much teaching about what it really means to walk in love, and if there is anything that the Church worldwide is lacking, it is probably that genuinely walking in love with everybody.

I do believe what Jesus taught and claimed and He does still leave some things a mystery for us even though He has revealed much of Himself to us.

It would be incorrect for me to say I have abandoned the teachings of Paul as I am very grateful for much of what he penned.

In this book, a sequel to his much acclaimed Ascension and Ecclesia, Farrow, a Catholic theologian who teaches Christian thought at McGill University, presents what he hopes is a «more accessible sketch» of the relevance of the doctrine of the Ascension.

And we look at church history and the churches and leaders we respect, not only in the US but globally, and what we see is that the overwhelming majority of Christians past and present continue to teach that these passages are very much applicable today.

Much of what Ramsey teaches is sound, helpful advice, particularly for middle - class Americans struggling with mounting credit card bills.

I've been reading the monastics recently, and it strikes me that while much of modern evangelicalism echoes their teachings on self - control and self - denial when it comes to sexuality, we tend to gloss over a lot what this great cloud of monastic witnesses has to say about self - control and self - denial in other areas of life — like materialism, food, relationships, and hospitality.

Much of what he teaches with his words and thoughts and his drawings can cause great pain and confusion to a brand new or immature, weak Christian.

If you accepted it then you would have to change much of what you teach, it would make many who you regard as friends angry with you, and would hurt your reputation.

But later I accepted the idea of his divinity — without much reflection — because of the power and truth of what he taught.»

It's hard to believe that there is so much information about this one chapter, and most of what you are saying contradicts everything I have been taught my whole life.

Doubtless much of what is believed and taught about it is wrong or partially wrong.

Yes, I agree to some extent with what you are saying, especially that teachers much study to show themselves approved, and that big flashy shows are popular, but really don't teach anyone the Word of God.

More of the «deposit of faith» was lost with each additional schism, until much of what is taught and practiced in the Western Churches has become the opposite of what was taught and practiced in the Early Church:

Each one of us must eventually face the real issue, which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?

Every one of them tries to perpetuate an archaic belief set derived using the world's worst decision - making technique — faith — and survives only because it provides a handy social outlet for people, most of whom aren't even aware of as much as 5 % of what their religion supposedly teaches.

That challenge, he told me, forced him to re-think much of what he had been teaching and preaching.

And «I'm a neurotic skeptic who thinks she's a Christian most of the time, but hates so much of what Christianity stands for, yet loves the teachings of Jesus, but struggles to actually follow them» tends to frighten people a bit.

But, for the most part, I think this view has some merit, and does help explain what Jesus might have meant in John 16:12 where He said He had much more to teach, but could not do so because they were not ready to hear it.

What about it disturbs you so much that you put so much effort into avoiding it even though the Bible does indeed teach us to study that we may be approved, and to defend what it teaches us without fWhat about it disturbs you so much that you put so much effort into avoiding it even though the Bible does indeed teach us to study that we may be approved, and to defend what it teaches us without fwhat it teaches us without fear?

Two things: (1) that I place myself firmly and staunchly within the Church and the Christian faith; and (2) that I am firmly and staunchly convinced that much of what the Church has taught as doctrine for most of its twenty centuries, and much of what constitutes orthodox belief today, is just plain wrong.

Jesus hated religion so much he came to shake the very foundations of what was being taught at his time.

That is pretty much what I was taught as well.

Any student should know that James Petrigu Boyce had a much different set of beliefs than what the Southern Baptists teach today.

Critical thinking is simply that stage where we make decisions about how much of what we were taught as children we are going to carry with us.

In many ways this argument with Brightman can be seen as a formative moment in Hartshorne's thinking which taught him as much about what he could not allow into his thought as about what he could.

The story of Bambi is really about one thing: The young deer Bambi is gradually taught by the old stag how to live wisely, and much of what he learns has to do with death.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Of the Bible she wrote, «I regard these writings as histories consisting of mingled truth and fiction, and while I admire and cherish much of what I believe to have been the moral teaching of Jesus himself, I consider the system of doctrines built upon the facts of his life... to be most dishonorable to God and most pernicious in its influence on individual and social happiness.»

I tried to stay out of the discussion as much as possible, because I didn't want to guide the discussion into what my Bible College, Seminary, and years of pastoral experience had taught me.