Sentences with phrase «much the point here»

That's pretty much the point here: people won't be perfect, guaranteed.

Not exact matches

«Here's where the money came from and here's how much cash you should expect coming through your door at any given poHere's where the money came from and here's how much cash you should expect coming through your door at any given pohere's how much cash you should expect coming through your door at any given point.
No matter if it is hardware (which many rumors are pointing to), a replacement UI for existing devices (which makes sense from a data capture point of view), an enhanced app (after all they are constantly iterating their mobile code base), or a mixture of all three, the key factor for Facebook here is to capture as much data as possible on Facebook users» mobile habits.
As a side point, perhaps interesting to monetary wonks here at OTE, the title's insistence on the 1993 vintage of the Taylor rule is out of step with much research on the variables, values, and coefficients that would go into such a rule today.
Here I conclude that for anyone like me who does not travel much at all and have Freedom and Freedom Unlimited cards (both earn UR Points) the overall net benefit is more with $ 450 annual fee CSR card when compared to lower fee CSP card (Please see the math above).
by The two below videos pretty much sum up what I have to say so I will not add too much here other than the following couple of points.
The point I want to make is although breaks above the price - related obstacles that are currently being challenged won't give us useful new information, it won't take much additional strength from here to effect upside breakouts that really do mean something.
Here again, if you're looking at the funnel purely from a revenue point of view, or spending too much time focusing on transactions, the customer experience gets lost in the shuffle.
I'm exaggerating here but the general point he was trying to make was that merger arb is very much a low volatility way to invest in the market.
I started this show as background noise a few years ago, not expecting much, and here we are 4 season in, and it's still one of my favorite shows, while I don't believe this season is as good as season 2 or maybe 3 as a whole, it has its high points, a couple of things fall a little flat, but no single episode failed in my opinion.
If I played the same game as you and took the number of Muslims killed by American ammunition, bombs, cluster bombs, missiles, sanctions, depleted uranium, etc., etc. and divided that into numbered points featuring the victims in groups of 50, 60, or 100, I'd be giving you a MUCH longer list of Muslim victims of America than the list of victims of Islamic terrorism that you provided to us here.
b) ironically, i gave you information that pointed to a much deeper pool of scholarship here.
Seeing all the frightened, angry, ignorant people here points to why the US is in so much trouble now...
So while the we are not told here (or anywhere) much about these spiritual beings — we don't have an explanation of their powers or of what kind of effects they can have on the believers — Paul's point is that we don't need to worry, because Christ is far above them.
only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!
But here the archetypes that the mythic gestures of beginning point to are much more explicit.
I have to admit here that maybe proponents of «old think» had half a point when they complained that it was not always a good thing for the Press to exhibit an instinctive adversarial relationship to the president, as much as that posture may have been justified in the case of Mr. Bush.
I think the point he's trying to get across is that, while many of the posts on here are as you described them, you said as much in the exact way that you profess everyone else discusses things.
Here we have the interesting notion fairly and squarely presented to us, of there being elements of the universe which may make no rational whole in conjunction with the other elements, and which, from the point of view of any system which those other elements make up, can only be considered so much irrelevance and accident — so much «dirt,» as it were, and matter out of place.
He would so gladly be himself before God, but not with respect to this fixed point where the self suffers, there despairingly he will not be himself; he hopes that eternity will remove it, and here in the temporal, however much he suffers under it, he can not will to accept it, can not humble himself under it in faith.
There is another hymn by Charles Wesley which is very much to the point here: «O for a heart to praise my God!»
And here is the whole point of the much misunderstood teachings of Luke 14.
The Spanish peasant saying that «to make love is to declare one's sorrow» is very much to the point here, Human love requires such an identification with the one who is loved that his or her deepest and most painful experience is known and shared.
The point here is that the much - vaunted quality of life and pace of life are not automatic givens in our lives.
Here the ethic, which in Buddhism is also identical with the teaching of salvation — perhaps even more than it had been in the Brahmanic system — has much more latitude; it has a task that is metaphysically meaningful — suspending at one point the cosmic law, unraveling it, as it were.
There are two points to be reiterated here: firstly that it is clear that sexual activity is normal among those who attend the Masses; secondly, and much more seriously, that though the diocese told The Telegraph that «non-celibate gay people should not be given Communion», it has not enforced this and indeed didn't once point out to the SMPC that Church teaching should be faithfully fostered, not effectively undermined, by official celebrations of the Church's definitive offering to God the Father.
I don't believe that what is going on here is down to me not having a thick skin and not down to you not listening and / or not being welcoming / affriming to good points that are made as much as others.
We are here on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there be a point to a test if we were given the answers?
They point out that it has been here for two thousand years and the world is not very much improved.
Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»
@ c - casa said, «We are here on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there be a point to a test if we were given the answers?»
Much more could be said about this, but it's important to simply note here that, in the words of Peter Enns, «Paul does not feel bound by the original meaning of the Old Testament passage he is citing, especially as he seeks to make a vital theological point about the gospel.»
But I suspect that is not the point here, as much as I am sure that it is not Paul's point to exclude Women from the role of «Bishop», whatever that is.
The atheists here don't know the Bible and I seriously doubt have any gay friends much less real friends so they speak not from any caring point but to take The Bible out of society.
SO much point of view in here.
As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.
But my point here is that unsatisfactory economic ideas and practices which have an impressive history of failure, which caused to founder that great nation California, which lie at the root of much of the shame and dread and division and hostility and cynicism with which our society is presently afflicted, are treated as immutable truths, not to be questioned, not to be interfered with, lest they unleash their terrible retribution, recoiling against whomever would lay a hand on the Ark of Market Economics, if that is the name under which this mighty power is currently invoked.
Here I have especially in mind the insistence of existentialism on the involvement of the self in every interpretation of the meaning of the world, a point with which existentialist thinkers from Kierkegaard to Jaspers, Marcel, Sartre, and Heidegger have been much concerned.
got a lot of sensitive people here, likely doing as much wrong as they can, and feeling subconscious guilt because someone's pointing it out..
What in an older kind of philosophy would have been called the chain - of - cause - and - effect is here seen as being very much richer; it is a congeries of occasions, events, pressures, movements, routes, which come to focus at this or that point, and which for their explanation require some principle that has brought and still is bringing each of them, rather than some other possible occurrence, into this particular concrete moment of what we commonly style «existence».
The point here is that they are highlighting so much of what they do that is not the gospel and then when asked about the gospel's absence, they say, «Well, of course the gospel.»
Here, she tells us about her upcoming move to the South of France as a way to be closer to nature, her bedtime and beauty routines, her ways of dealing with jet lag, why she makes a point of packing parmesan and olive oil to bring on her journeys, and much more.
There's so much more to unpack here, too, and so many more discussion points.
Here you will find the latest Social Media Content, Point of Sale Materials, Webinar Calendar and Registration, Research Documents and much much more.
Thank you for adding in the links of these various printers, I have yet to find a place here in Calgary that I really love and taking a look at these books is a much better starting point for explaining exactly what I want.
Combined with the offense averaging 9.7 yards per play, it is difficult to see how Tech's first game of 2012 could have gone much better; only turnovers (Northwestern State was plus - 11.8 in turnover points margin, as defined here) failed to go Tech's way.
I read so much absolute rubbish on here, yet you pick on the fact she's a female to try and make a point.
Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.
My point then to justarsenal.com is this — I click through to your site among the dozens that offer AFC content — because I value much of what I read here.
And whilst accepting the point about fans eulogising just a little too much about one of our players it does sort of reverse the trend of denigrating our players and wishfully elevating the status / ability of other team's players — the grass is always greener is a powerful thing on here.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z