Sentences with phrase «much uncertainty due»

• 13 percent — «I would delay buying a home because there is too much uncertainty due to the upcoming election.»

Gold prices have also been flip - flopping on a daily basis with no trend in sight as there is so much uncertainty due to the possibility of a trade war with China.

Not exact matches

Much of the focus in due diligence is on the costs of remediation and future environmental liabilities because one thing those firms don't like is uncertainties around unexpected law suits or big clean - up bills popping up in the future.

Crucially, the governor's initial State of the State speech came more than a week before he is due to release his Executive Budget for the next fiscal year, which throws much uncertainty into the mix as to how he proposes to pay for his ambitious proposals and whether the budget will include any surprise announcements.

«There is massive uncertainty in this figure, and until much more research is done no serious scientist should express any confidence in such estimates,» of iron fertilization's geoengineering potential, cautions oceanographer Richard Lampitt of the National Oceanography Center in England, who also argues that more research into such potential geoengineering techniques is needed due to the failure of global efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

Much of this uncertainty is due to the complexity of aerosols and their interactions with and impacts on cloud processes and properties, as well as the wide range of scales on which these interactions occur.

Much of the uncertainty in projections of global climate change is due to the complexity of clouds, aerosols, and cloud - aerosol interactions, and the difficulty of incorporating this information into climate models.

Much of the uncertainty of models that project future trends of Arctic Ocean acidification is due to inadequate data coverage, particularly in higher latitudes.

But the bias uncertainty is smaller than the errors which are not persistent in time (e.g. due to incomplete spatial coverage), so I don't think accounting for this would make much difference, as Victor suggests.

We ultimately face a question of what we trust more: our estimate of our cumulative emissions to date combined with our full knowledge of how much warming that might imply, or an estimate of how warm the system was in 2014 which is subject to error due to observational uncertainty and natural variability.

Cohen made it sound like the chart's wide range of climate outcomes was due to scientific uncertainty, when in fact much of the range is tied to social and economic unknowns.

The SSTs should be free of UHI and much less susceptible to uncertainty due to lack of complete coverage, i.e. something we could hang our hats on — then Steve M opens this can of worms.

In recent years, going back 20 to 30 years, notice how much the slopes can change — this is due to the limitations of counting statistics, a category of systemic uncertainty.

He also presented evidence that much of the discrepancy was due to observational uncertainty, resulting from stratospheric cooling contaminating satellite measurements of tropospheric temperature (a point that's been noted by the NOAA satellite analysis team since at least 2004; see: «Contribution of stratospheric cooling to satellite - inferred tropospheric temperature trends»).

The aim of this project is to examine much more exhaustively than has previously been possible the climate uncertainties due to uncertainties in how to model land surface effects.

I have it straight from the Horses mouth that the historic temperature record is not given much credence these days due to scientific uncertainties and they are somewhat played down.

In that case the mean (or median) Anthro contribution may be as little as 100 %, but may be as much as 116 %, with the additional uncertainty due to rounding error.

Another issue is whether we have estimated the totality of uncertainty in the long - term data set used — maybe the envelope is really much larger, due to inherent characteristics of the proxy data themselves....

These feedbacks are the primary source of uncertainty in how much the earth will warm (side note: the question that most climate scientists who study the forcing due to CO2 try to answer is, how much will the long - term globally averaged surface temperature of the earth rise due to an rapid rise of CO2 to twice its industrial level, that is, 270 ppm to 540 ppm; it is currently about 380 last time I checked, and rising at ~ 3ppm / year, although this rate of change appears to be accelerating).

One can also observe that sulfate production has not fallen that much, due to new contributions from China and India and other developing nations (interestingly, early drafts of the fourth IPCC report hypothesized that sulfate production may not have decreased at all from its peak, due to uncertainties in Asian production).

Most of the controversy and uncertainty seems to be around how much bigger Y is than 0.3 due to positive feedbacks.

Much of this has been due to uncertainty over regulatory moves by governments around the world, in reaction to what was a revolutionary year for the cryptocurrency market as a whole.