Sentences with phrase «much upside given»

There seems to be so much upside given the traditional lending market is $ 3 trillion.

Not exact matches

He believes that while this dip proved an opportunity for some resurgence in the stock, it's not likely to give much more to the upside.

I have enough passive income to give me peace of mind that if I lose my job my world won't get thrown upside down; I feel like I don't want much more than that runtil I retire or slow down at work, and I should be more growth focused and less income focused.

The point I want to make is although breaks above the price - related obstacles that are currently being challenged won't give us useful new information, it won't take much additional strength from here to effect upside breakouts that really do mean something.

I think most investors would be wise to take a more conservative posture at this point, and be willing to give up some upside for a while... just depends on how much relative performance risk you can stomach.

A bane because there is so much lousy thinking out there, for people who misuse their minds and don't «think» about the issues, or don't use their noodles effectively (the irony is that someone like yourself would say your brain is «god given»... in my opinion, this god would smack you upside the head for not using it as he intended).

Some team will give him that chance — there is too much upside for some team to not do that.

I'm torn on this — the 2nd overall pick gives you a chance to draft a legitimate difference maker, but unfortunately the top of the draft seems to be 4 QBs who seem to have as much upside as they do question marks and guys whose true talents don't necessarily warrant the value of a # 2.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I only go to the games a few times during the season since I don't live in England, for those who do, we need to defy those damn stewards and raise the temperature at the games, that's the only practical solution I can come up with, we are not the ones who buy the players and all the noise we have made on social media and elsewhere keeps falling on deaf ears, they will not listen to our calls for players, let's go to the games and turn the library upside down as much as we can, we can not give those players a moments rest, we, the fans pay them [gate takings and TV subscriptions], you can't take my money and not give 100 %, Wenger can pamper them, we would not, they don't read much that is being said on social media but they can't ignore our chants at the stadium.

Be warned — this will exhaust your muscles, but the upside is that it will also give your muscles the opportunity to grow much faster than before!

I'm not giving too much away to say that it's an image of an upside - down sea, mirroring in some ways the seaside setting of the final scene.

Stays true to the roots of the original season but goes that step further and gives you insight into the link with the upside down, showing there is much more to it...

By writing covered calls, then, you're giving up much of a stock's upside potential in exchange for income today.

What diversification does do is reduce the long - term risk of the portfolio — you give up a little upside in exchange for not incurring as much downside.

The disadvantage is that there may not be much time premium and you give up all of your upside potential.

We remain always invested with a buy - and - hold position in a given market, in order to capture as much of the upside as we can.

At your age I would increase my bond exposure to 20 %, leave 80 % in equities to capture as much of the upside as possible, and invest any new money into bonds until either it reaches its target or a specified amount of time has passed (ie give 2 years for equity recovery then rebalance).

Big Picture: Completing this smaller pattern would break the range to the upside giving us much larger targets.

I'm sure I'm going to run into a few aspects of the BAEC that I haven't really given much thought to and that may turn out to be further downsides... but there may be unexpected upsides too.

Their lives had been turned upside down, they didn't understand the process or the likely outcomes, and some knew a stranger (the judge) would be making a decision about where their kids would live or how much child support they would give or receive.

But given how much we've heard leaked about this thing, there may be a big upside.

«I chose to give up a solid, steady income as an attorney because there was much more upside in growing a business,» she explains.