Sentences with phrase «much value for your money»

You get much value for your money here, and the guitar will create big smiles for years to come.

The Lighthouse of Hope box sounds great — so much value for money, and it's great that they support a cause.

Objectively speaking, the Audi A7 doesn't really offer that much value for money.

If you want the latest and greatest, then the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge (Review Pictures), which costs nearly Rs. 65,000 is the phone to buy, but it doesn't feel like as much value for money as its non-curved counterpart.

It gives you so much value for your money that I fail to see how other companies could compete against the low entry level price point for the degree of functionality you get right out of the box.

But why settle for one experience when green season prices give you twice as much value for your money?

It's ironic though to complain about getting too much value for your money.

Again as with my previous suggestions, there has to be a few different adventures as I personally feel 1 adventure per character doesn't offer much value for money.

Not long ago, we saw the handsets like Galaxy K Zoom and Galaxy Camera from Samsung, apart from the fact that they were failed experiments when it comes to the sales since they were priced hefty and didn't offer that much value for money.

Not exact matches

For example, if you're owed money by a large, well - known company, the asset will have a much stronger value than if you are owed money by the local bakery down the street.

Companies don't want to just sit on money, much for the same reason that investors don't like holding piles of cash either: Inflation erodes the value of the cash, so putting it to work makes sense.

«Amazon is as much about «value» as «cheap,»» Stefan Weitz, executive vice president of technology services for the e-commerce management firm Radial, told MONEY via email.

In each of our ETF and mutual fund reports, we also provide the «Accumulated Total Costs vs Benchmark» analysis to show investors, in dollar - value terms, how much money comes out of the their pocket to pay for fund management.

Utilizing Your Cash Buying a Business Selling a Business Valuing Your Business - How Much Is It Worth Raising Money for Your Business Borrowing Money Preparing a Business Plan Preparing to Meet a Bank or Investor Tips on Negotiating an Investor Deal An Exit Strategy from Your Business What to Include In an Investor Agreement Patents

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

I hope «Christianity» is the right religion, if it is not then I have wasted a lot of time and money, or perhaps not, for if one lives up to the values, beliefs and principles of true Christianity that one would be one of the nicest people to live on Earth with and as a child of 6 I realized I did not like any of the people in my neighborhood very much, not much at all.

Among all the New World competitors, Australia by far stood out for the consistency of its Chardonnay quality and its value for money, bagging six out of the seven much coveted Master titles and seven Gold medals.

It's no surprise such money - driven competitions have surged in popularity, given that multiple highly credible studies have underscored the value of employing financial incentives and peer support to positively influence weight loss. HealthyWage.com's own diet - for - dollars program allows participants to make a wager upfront ranging anywhere from $ 20 a month to as much as $ 500.

The amount of money you would have to pay them, if you pay them a certain amount they would have to get that much money and even more because of taxable benefit issues just to pay for the value of their scholarship.

Likewise, one reason L.A. can pay that much money is because they've spent the past 30 years paying for success and taking risks and refusing to rebuild, which in turn made them the most valuable and visible team in the NBA, with massive revenue streams that allow them to overpay for future success, guaranteeing more value.

Arsenal are odds - on at 1/3 to win this game, which looks like a license to print money as far as I am concerned if you are a big time gambler, but being greedy I am going to look for a much better value bet and will probably increase my stakes by getting some bonuses from the best betting sites listed on bettingsiteoffers.co.uk.

I think we have much better value for money.

The league's current structure for signing international amateurs — players born outside the United States ages 16 - 22 and with less than five years of experience in a professional league recognized by MLB — involves allotted signing bonus values for teams, with more money available the worse a team's record the previous year, very much like a draft.

He's proven much better value for money than Di Maria at # 60m, who's been pretty invisible since November.

Which means a willingness to pay what they're worth & getting rid of Walcott would allow the club to offer as much to an incoming player: any of them above would be willing to talk for that amount of money & feel valued.

I wish fans would appreciate that Elneny at # 5m represents very good value for money.He was bought as a back up player unlike Xhaka and Mustafi who were so called stars costing # 70m who were going to take us to a higher level.If Arsenal were to sell Elneny they would at least double their money whereas we would take a huge hit on Xhaka and Mustafi.In fact I very much doubt it we would recoup 50 % of our outlay.Enemy will never be a great player but he is the type of dependable, hard working standby that every top team needs.Please get off his back.

arsenal as a big and rich club they didn't spent so much money to buy best players in the past years like the other big clubs so this time it is a must that arsenal buys best defender, midfielder and striker and as well keep Sanchez valuing the service that he will be giving next season mote than # 50 m which will also protect him not to play against arsenal at least for the coming season, and who knows after wards..

It doesn't matter how much money a club has, even the biggest and richest of the Premier League giants will be hoping to secure value - for - money in deals this summer, with both Manchester City and Chelsea featuring on our list of five bargain deals that could go through this summer.

Can anyone say, with a straight face, that there is not a single player in that list who would have come to United, made them a much better team, and been fantastic value for money?

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It would probably have been too much money for someone to take the whole lot together but if I had to value it I'd say the complete collection — including tickets — was worth # 80,000 easy.

Pretty much the only thing Spurs don't have for all their big money, big value and big talk is a nice big trophy.

In «Jané Trider Extreme Stroller reviews» when we talk about compatibility then obviously stroller is very much luxuries with attractive look & good features, & if you want value for money then you can go for it if you can compromise with the heavy weight.

Excellent value for money and much better than a high chair which takes up space.

When it comes to value for money, it is really hard to beat the entry - level sit and stand stroller from Graco because it doesn't promise to do too much, yet delivers exactly what it's supposed to.

Much more value for money than the regular cartridge that only has 1000 flashes!

19 December 2011 — COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS IN PUBLIC LIFE Question: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much they estimated the inquiry by the Committee on Standards in Public Life into party political finance would cost; what the final cost of the inquiry was; and how they would assess what represents value for money in the case of such inquiries.

We need to bring common sense to Common Core because New York is wasting too much time and money stressing children out to prepare for these tests which are of questionable educational value instead of focusing on supporting teachers so they can do their job and teach children what's really important,» said Assemblyman Jim Tedisco, a former public school special education teacher and guidance counselor.

I have learned so much about making public bodies work better, and getting good value for money, it would be crazy not to build on it.»

What we need to do is introduce real reforms into both to make them much more effective and thus give taxpayers far better value for money.

There's so much that this machine can do, it's an incredible value for the money.

Time may be a kind of cosmic currency — a stand - in for other things we value, in much the same way that money is a placeholder that represents items of value in our transactions.

«They can help determine how much fertilizer to apply based on fertilizer cost, grain value, and money available for fertilizer use,» says Wortmann.

Much more value for money!

I am not much of an impulse shopper and this is strictly because I value my money that I work hard for and want to use it wisely.

For a dress of this quality i would have expected to pay much more for a dress of this quality so it was also great value for monFor a dress of this quality i would have expected to pay much more for a dress of this quality so it was also great value for monfor a dress of this quality so it was also great value for monfor money!

Its definitely great value fot money much cheaper than what it was in store for exactly the same watch bargin!

I ended up moving to Sendinblue for my newsletter away from Mailchimp because the value for the money was so much higher.

Safety & Credibility Chance of Getting a Date Active Members Value for Money Features Customer Service And Much More...