Thanks for the thoughtful review, though you somewhat understate the phenomenal performance by Cate Blanchett; it would be
a much weaker film without her fearless, raw portrayal of an unraveling mind.
Not exact matches
The north - east regional development agency, One North East, and its
film and digital technology arm, Northern and
Film Media, has now been abolished and replaced by
much weaker and unfunded local enterprise partnerships.
The sweetness of the first stories seems now entirely gone, with this one adopting a
much more serious tone, and Yates manages to condense the longest (and
weakest) book into a decent
film even if it feels more like a transition chapter between the fourth and sixth chapters.
Dorff is stellar and the
film builds some tension but a bit too
much required suspension of disbelief, some plot holes,
weak dialogue, and two increasingly silly twist endings ultimately sink the piece.
The idea is stale, but I had so
much fun with the first one that I had to give a little credit to this very
weak, but fun
film.
While there are various
weak points to the
film, but there is not
much point to mentioning them.
His latest feature, «Django Unchained,» marks a few firsts for the director — including the first
film not produced by Lawrence Bender (if you don't count «Grindhouse») and the first
film not edited by longtime collaborator Sally Menke (who unfortunately passed away in 2010)-- and though it's hard to say how
much of an effect that had on the finished product, it's easily one of his
weaker movies.
I would rate it as one of Mann's
weaker films, but, even as possibly Mann's worst
film (for being similar to his others) its still
much better than most of the crap pumped out by Hollywood today.
It's not
much of an achievement that co-directors Anthony and Joe Russo (held over from Captain America the Winter Soldier) make a better
film than Zack Snyder... but it's worth noting that Marvel (corporation as auteur) have nurtured their characters (even in
weaker films like Iron Man 2) to the point when they carry more screen weight than lasting icons Batman and Superman.
These are the things that should have easily been figured out at the script stage before the
film was handed over to a
weaker director like Chadwick, who basically conveys the story as given to him and doesn't offer
much more than that.
In fact, although Sudeikis is technically the
film's lead, he's actually the
weakest link of the bunch, relying too
much on his one - note wisecracking to realize that he's being outshined by the rest of his «family.»
The story is
weak and there is way too
much talking for an «action»
film.
Well I think we're all pretty
much expecting Cars 2 to be one of Pixar's
weakest films to date, and the marketing sure isn't doing
much to change our minds.
Amid
much badly accented dialogue that does nothing to clear up the plot's convolutions, Kinnaman proves the
film's
weakest link, chewing scenery so voraciously as the tale's nominal villain that he ultimately undermines any faint semblance of seriousness.
Nero's a bit of a yelling villain and Bana can only do so
much to make him interesting and that's the
film's one
weak point.
Luckily Brando and Harris — the
film's
weakest characters — are supported by a fine cast of British actors, and the decision to
film their scenes on an fully functional reconstruction of the Bounty pays off
much in the way directors Peter Weir and Fraser Hestion were able to extract rich atmosphere through the use of real ships in Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003) and Treasure Island [M](1988), respectively.
Technically and dramatically
much weaker than most slick science - fiction
films, Soylent Green is still more realistic on one terrifying point: the ecology will deteriorate, through misuse and overuse of plant and animal life as well as overpopulation,
much sooner than human technology and architecture will advance to accommodate it and create the oppressive - but - neat world of domes, interplanetary travel and multi-leveled cities that characterize most movies of the s.f. genre.
Shoddy writing takes
much of the «fun» out of this mystery, leaving you with a
weak hybrid of more coherent and compelling
films.
This likely is not due to low budget as
much as it has to do with the poor first half the
film and
weak storyline.
The
film was
much smarter than it needed to be, and the climactic encounter with living foodstuff was perhaps the
weakest element.
The
film's message may have been diluted by a
weak resolution that dissolved into nostalgic sentimentality and undermined
much of what came before, but the imagery still resonates.
But she does come close, because a
film this hackneyed could only be driven through charm alone, and even if the overall
film falls short, it's so good - natured and fun in spots that you almost are willing to forgive just how
weak much of it really is.
Presumably included for the entire family is a sing - along feature that presents three of the
film's seven musical numbers karaoke style, but given how
weak the song score is, I can't imagine anyone getting
much use out of this feature.
Thor and Loki are voiced by the
films actors lending some
much - needed quality, but otherwise hammer blows sound
weak and the music is just generic.