Sentences with phrase «much yield loss»

Not exact matches

As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.

Meanwhile, I've been my own harshest critic — particularly with regard to the unfortunate timing of my stress - testing decision in 2009 — and have been very open about the challenges that QE and yield - seeking speculation have posed for the methods that resulted: deferring market losses that resulted much more quickly following extremely overextended market conditions in prior historical cycles.

If we can avoid capital losses in the near term and then buy investment - worthy assets after they have dropped in price and offer much less capital risk and much higher income yields again, then there is hope for higher compound returns for many years thereafter.

Whenever susceptible rice varieties are grown in environments that favor bacterial blight, very high yield losses, as much as over 70 %, may be caused by bacterial blight.

There isn't much to savor from Team USA's 3 — 2 overtime loss to Slovenia on the opening day of the Olympic men's hockey preliminary round in PyeongChang, in which the Americans spoiled a 2 — 0 lead with under 15 minutes to play and then yielded a tap - in winner when all three defenders were caught puck - watching less than a minute into overtime.

Of the audits compiled as part of the study, 22 pointed to water loss as an issue and estimated that fixes could yield as much as $ 2.2 million in savings.

Dr. Calderwood has observed as much as 80 - 90 % yield loss in northeastern hop yards due to arthropod pests.

Moore and Lobell predict that corn farmers can reduce yield losses by as much as 87 percent through long - term adaptation.

Whenever susceptible rice varieties are grown in environments that favor bacterial blight, very high yield losses, as much as over 70 %, may be caused by bacterial blight.

In the short term, a particular stock has much more uncertainty and, consequently, the greatest risk of loss and liquidity which should yield a greater potential return.

It is invested primarily in the credit market, not so much in government bonds because government bond yields are so low, but we're looking for absolute returns even if interest rates go up, so some of the portfolio, a significant piece of it actually, is floating rate, so if interest rates go up, you just get higher cash flows, which will support higher returns, and the rest of the portfolio is in relatively short maturity bonds, which will have some price volatility and if there's bad market conditions, will have temporary losses, so the goal is to offer something that is absolute returns.

Rising yields and shrinking P / E ratios would mean capital losses which would reduce returns below these levels, much as falling yields and rising multiples fueled the wonderful returns of the past 25 years.

As much as I hate the low yield in online savings, the reality is there is no risk of capital loss, and if interest rates continue to climb you'll slowly see the yields on savings increase.

From a percentage standpoint, this scenario would deliver an instant 5.7 % yield for selling the covered call ($ 5.75 / $ 100.05) and pretty much a 0.0 % return from capital gains / losses -LRB-- $ 0.05 / $ 100.05).

Lesser lenders absorbed lesser losses in exchange for the ability to get a much greater yield if there was no default.

Assuming a dividend yield of 2.5 %, this translates to a loss of as much as 1.25 % per year.

The error that the «earlies» made, and I knew quite a few of them, was not recognizing how much debt could be crammed into the financial economy in order to juice returns on fixed income assets with yields lower than likely default losses.

They can pay you a yield, sure, but if the underlying value is not growing, you will eventually get capital losses, and after that, much less yield.

The heat would also cause staple crops to suffer dramatic yield losses across the globe (it is possible that Indian wheat and U.S. corn could plummet by as much as 60 percent), this at a time when demand will be surging due to population growth and a growing demand for meat.

The natural variation that has led us out of the Little Ice Age has a bit of frosting on the cake by land use; and, part of that land use has resulted in a change in vegetation and soil CO2 loss so that we see a rise in CO2 and the CO2 continues to rise without a temperature accompaniment (piano player went to take a leak), as the land use has all but gobbled up most of the arable land North of 30N and we are starting to see low till farming and some soil conservation just beginning when the soil will again take up the CO2, and the GMO's will increase yields, then CO2 will start coming down on its own and we can go to bed listening to Ave Maria to address another global crisis to get the populous all scared begging governments to tell us much ado about... nothing.

While carbon fertilization does reduce the loss in yields, the effect is much smaller than that of irrigation, suggesting that water stress at higher temperatures may be largely responsible for losses.

They also find that Irrigation has a much larger preventative effect on yield loss than increased carbon dioxide, suggesting that water stress at higher temperatures may be largely responsible for losses.