Sentences with phrase «multiple climate science»

It's only from that baseline belief — the precipitate explanation — that we can then get into multiple climate science concepts — the tentative theories: — Being unprecedented, changes must therefore be alarming, and since they are occurring since the late 20th C they must have been primarily caused by man, so man must be responsible for some % for alarming climate change i.e attribution man v nature.

He was a former research professor at James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, and advisor to multiple climate science denial organisations around the world.

Not exact matches

They've posted multiple videos of the «Friends of Science,» another climate change denying group.

The research, led by scientists at the University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science and partners, has important implications for the long - term survival of coral reefs worldwide, which have been in worldwide decline from multiple stressors such as climate change and ocean pollution.

«In the case of the climate, of course, there is only one Earth, so we can't do experiments with multiple Earths and formulate the science of climate change as if it's an entirely observationally based, controlled experiment.

• Produce and disseminate translated content about both science and innovation in multiple forms to spark new ideas and help build a climate in which innovators and early adopters will find support for their work and for constructive dissatisfaction with the status quo.

That means instead of students taking math class, then science class, then English class, they will choose an event or phenomenon to study, incorporating multiple subjects in the process (something like exploring the climates of different countries, and reporting on them in French).

In climate science there have been multiple examples of each possibility and multiple ways in which each set of errors has arisen, and so we'll take them in turn.

Though I'm not comprehensively literate in the multiple lines of evidence supporting the consensus of climate specialists for AGW, I'm sufficiently meta - literate in the culture and practice of science to recognize genuine expertise when I see it.

To stop CO2 ppm rising and holding them at under 408 ppm for 2018 would require a reduction in Net carbon emissions of at least 2 GtC / yr on current use based on multiple lines of refs in published papers from Hansen down to the latest PhD student of climate science.

If I read the some of the conclusions in the latest report on Abrupt Climate Change from the US Climate Change Science Program http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap3-4/final-report/default.htm, in particular Chapter 2, it would seem possible to come up with multiple feet of sea level rise due to the understanding of ice dynamics.

Despite his evident lack of skill to evaluate the multiple lines of evidence accumulated by 2 centuries of climate science, DDS has made it clear he believes the lopsided consensus of working climate scientists is «alarmist».

I notice that it took me, an amateur with no professional qualifications directly related to climate science, only moments to independently identify multiple weaknesses in the questions, the same weaknesses that other commenters have pointed out.

To overcome these drawbacks, researchers at the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change propose an alternative method that only a handful of other groups are now pursuing: a self - consistent modeling framework to assess climate impacts across multiple regions and sectors.

My sense about the climate emails that have been stolen and the information they have provided is that they have released a barrage of additional information which makes clear the robustness of the science, the multitude, the enormous multitude of different strands of evidence that support the urgency and the severity of the problem, that have been managed in multiple places around the world.

As you know, more extreme and extended droughts over bigger areas is one of the most basic predictions of climate science, and has been discussed in multiple major peer - reviewed articles in the last two years.

Although there are multiple lines of evidence and well - understood physics that show humans are dramatically warming the planet, climate science contrarians have seized upon the stick as being the single pillar that holds up the entire climate science edifice.

-- One maker of Science programs for schools NCSE announces that they are making a new climate change program — 5 weeks later a story pop up over multiple green websites using a loaded title «Anti-science» which reveals another conservative organisation has a secret agenda to flood US schools with «climate denier» material.

Given your interest in the state of climate science, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to better understand your perspective and rationale for the proposed activity; and to discuss climate science, including which areas are at the frontiers of scientific knowledge and which are well - established because of thousands of studies from multiple lines of evidence.

Does the very nature of climate science, with its congruence of multiple subdisciplines into one overarching theory exacerbate both the formation of the cascade and the maintenance of the belief?

I am talking about a consensus of multiple lines of evidence (empirical evidence in addition to modeling, logic etc.) When there is a large degree of uncertainty, as there is in climate science, a consensus of evidence is most definitely very important.

cwon14 / WUWT ignorantly spews toxic venom: • Dr. Curry's «technical comments are a distraction», and • Dr. Curry's views «aren't a rational position», and • Dr. Curry's merely «the least insane person», and • Dr. Curry is «a poster child for failed skeptics», and • Dr. Curry «is completely corrupted», and • Dr. Curry «is a statist in the end game», and • Dr. Curry's weblog is «where skeptics go to die», and • Dr. Curry's ««pause» is yet another stupid concept», and • Dr. Curry's belongs to «pinhead academia», and • Dr. Curry's research is «more climate science magic dust» (multiple further abusive claims not quoted)

We see science operating at multiple levels from the «hard» science looking at the molecular basis of disease (analogous to the physics underpinning the climate sciences), drug development, clinical trials of medical interventions with all their methodological flaws, epidemiological studies (again replete with statistical traps and definitional pitfalls — hockey sticks anyone?)

And such testing involves multiple matters of climate science, which courts are inherently ill - equipped to determine.

Climate science deniers and conservative media have found themselves a new «free speech» hero — an academic who is suing his own university and thinks the multiple human threats to Australia's Great Barrier Reef are overblown.

From Curry's place: Mapleleaf «Dr. Curry, I'm sure that you agree (correct me if you don't) that the science behind the theory of anthropogenic induced climate change is a long one, and very well established (I can hear the cries of indignance from those in denial about AGW / ACC already), and borne out by multiple, independent data sets and consilience.

When I use the term «AGW establishment» I am not referring to a specific organization that is defined within the usual legal or political constructs (say Union or corporation or NGO etc) but rather I am referring to the multiple groups, associations and other peering relationships that are «established» within the climate science / political / economic worlds.

«Australian University Dumps Bob Carter, Advisor To Multiple Global Climate Science Denial Groups,» Desmog, July 9, 2014.

«Australian University Dumps Bob Carter, Advisor To Multiple Global Climate Science Denial Groups,» DeSmogBlog, July 9, 2013.

-- that James Hansen's research strategy for verifying and validating climate change science, as set forth in his Earth's Energy Imbalance and Implications so strikingly embody the same NASA V&V principles that are associated to successful spacecraft design... particularly in emphasizing the absolute necessity for multiple, high - quality, redundant, cross-checked, climate measurements of global span!

BEST often present multiple versions / copies of the same longer datasets already used repeatedly in climate science.

The report also says that most of the benefits of climate mitigation policies in the short term will come in the form of public health co-benefits from reduced air pollution, suggesting that climate advocacy will be well served to move away from debates over climate science and apocalyptic doomsaying, instead focusing on the multiple benefits in the near term of moving toward cleaner energy sources.

Climate science has the monochrome Hockey Stick, artificially enhanced with multiple fabricated colours, for which climate scientists have been richly rewarded ever since, despite never being right about anClimate science has the monochrome Hockey Stick, artificially enhanced with multiple fabricated colours, for which climate scientists have been richly rewarded ever since, despite never being right about anclimate scientists have been richly rewarded ever since, despite never being right about anything.

Therefore, by that measure, you are telling us that the climate science consensus can not be considered here, because we know there are multiple lines of conclusive evidence of climate science consensus validity.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has reaffirmed the position of its Board of Directors and the leaders of 18 respected organizations, who concluded based on multiple lines of scientific evidence that global climate change caused by human activities is now underway, and it is a growing threat to society.

Establishment climate science has been a never - ending cornucopia of fraud, fabrications, misrepresentations and wild exaggerations that multiple skeptics have publicly exposed, much to the chagrin and angst of the anti-science «consensus.»

It has to be more creative than yet another multiple regression on proxy project in climate science.

Again, the pink dot on the chart tells the climate science reality: Per the empirical evidence, the recent White House anti-science climate change comments are blatantly false, without any scientific merit, and are deserving of multiple Pinocchio badges.

Changes in climate at the local to regional scale can be influenced by natural variability for multiple decades.28 This can affect the interpretation of climate trends observed regionally across the U.S. (see Appendix 3: Climate Science Supplclimate at the local to regional scale can be influenced by natural variability for multiple decades.28 This can affect the interpretation of climate trends observed regionally across the U.S. (see Appendix 3: Climate Science Supplclimate trends observed regionally across the U.S. (see Appendix 3: Climate Science SupplClimate Science Supplement).

Thus, John Cook's reasonably even handed and often understated site, skeptical science, which gives example after example after example — based upon the actual science, and vetted science papers — of the multiple fundamental myths that drive the great bulk (if not to some extent, ALL) climate change naysaying, is thus dismissed (and Cook himself — see some of the other anti climate change sites, for instance — repeatedly denigrated).

Nobody with even a basic understanding of the science would argue for a simple monotonic linear increase in temperatures in the presence of multiple forcings and internal climate variation.

• Science is verifiable Multiple hockey - sticks affirm the predictive explanations of climate - change sScience is verifiable Multiple hockey - sticks affirm the predictive explanations of climate - change sciencescience.

Of course, there is much more to climate science than a few sentences, but today we also know that multiple peer - reviewed studies show that 97 percent or more of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and caused by human activities.

I vividly recall a video in which a questioner in Australia tried to lecture my friend Stephen Schneider about how climate forcings were logarithmic and that this somehow invalidated the whole of climate science (wrong on multiple levels, and Stephen put the questioner in her place).

The climate science spoutings are not just embedded in the multiple governments of the west, but actually gospel!

The views in the clips are extreme but represent a grab bag of climate science denialist talking points, ignoring the mountains of evidence gathered from multiple sources over many decades of the impacts of loading the atmosphere and the oceans with carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels.

Anna Taylor, of the Stockholm Environment Institute in Oxford has no PhD at all, her research focuses on «stakeholder engagement in adapting to multiple stresses, including climate variability and change, water scarcity, food insecurity and health concerns» — not climate science, and has simply not been alive long enough to join the ranks of the specialists of specialisms that Dessler demands of sceptics.

Further review by the national academy of science and multiple university reviews of the committee findings found that by and large, the Hockey Stick was not flawed enough for them to consider it inappropriate for use as a model to represent the climate variability for the time period specified.

Even with ongoing questions about the proxy data, the IPCC's key statement — that most of the warming since the mid-twentieth century is «very likely» to be due to human - caused increases in greenhouse - gas concentration — remains solid because it rests on multiple lines of evidence from different teams examining many aspects of the climate system, says Susan Solomon, the former co-chair of the IPCC team that produced the 2007 physical science report and a climate researcher with the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado.

BTW, Harrison Schmitt made claims about climate science that were so wrong the Santa Fe New Mexican was forced to run corrections from multiple climate scientists.