That you make
multiple comments here that end up at an average of 50 comments on articles posted here does not mean you number anywhere near 100.
Seeing that Julie has made it clear in
multiple comments here that she is entirely willing to open the books for anyone who cares to challenge her version of events, we're left with only one conclusion.
Not exact matches
Yes we're all private citizens only you're paid by the Dem party to write lies
here and then you use
multiple names to write supporting
comments to yourself.
You even use
multiple names
here to
comment on your
comments but we know its just you using one of your many screen names.
Because I had
multiple colleagues and blog followers email me (or email me about) this article, I thought I would share it out with all of you, with some additional
comments, of course, but also given the
comments I already made in my prior post
here.
For every anecdote you provided in your article (Even forgetting how several of the people you quoted have themselves come
here to correct your errors)
multiple counterexamples have been provided just in this
comment thread.
so I'm going to just post one general response
here to the
comments below from
multiple people: In terms of whether breeding «should» be allowed, we could literally give a home to every dog in the shelters, and we'd still need millions more dogs a year to satisfy consumer demand.
Here's a direct citation from my article: «When discussing whether he would ever consider
multiple launch bundles of the PlayStation 3, as the Xbox 360 has now confirmed, Harrison was relatively caustic,
commenting: «Are there two versions of the Xbox that people want to buy?
Presumably the discussion thread addressing Senator Inhofe's
comments before the senate and the
multiple characterizations of it posted
here passed your test for scientific or newsworthy content while my [discarded] post citing Dr Chris Landsea's
comments concerning his reason for resigning from the IPCC were considered to be of no value by either standard of editorial judgement.
Steve has a post with
multiple updates and he's been egging everyone in
comments here to condemn the evil monsters at RC.
[addressing
multiple comments at once
here]-- Hi rich, One minor nitpick: you meant 4 one hundreths, not 1 four hundreth!
I mean, land ECS is not the same as ocean ECS, and, so, to answer in part a
comment made elsewhere
here, when they are combined, you do get
multiple bumps.
I really don't want to get into a mosh pit of donkeys and elephants
here, but I will say that I enjoyed the heck out of the comments on Ann Althouse's column this a.m.. Here's what her reader Pogo said about Kerry, and it's a strong echo of what I'm reading elsewhere from bloggers on multiple sides of the aisle (albeit varying degrees of angst and j
here, but I will say that I enjoyed the heck out of the
comments on Ann Althouse's column this a.m..
Here's what her reader Pogo said about Kerry, and it's a strong echo of what I'm reading elsewhere from bloggers on multiple sides of the aisle (albeit varying degrees of angst and j
Here's what her reader Pogo said about Kerry, and it's a strong echo of what I'm reading elsewhere from bloggers on
multiple sides of the aisle (albeit varying degrees of angst and joy):